5 research outputs found

    Supplementary Information

    No full text
    Data on valid crocodylomorph species, completeness, crocodylomorph-bearing collections, and body size, as well as temporal and spatial series for crocodylomorph diversity, completeness, and samplin

    Data from: Spatiotemporal sampling patterns in the 230 million year fossil record of terrestrial crocodylomorphs and their impact on diversity

    No full text
    The 24 extant crocodylian species are the remnants of a once much more diverse and widespread clade. Crocodylomorpha has an approximately 230 million year evolutionary history, punctuated by a series of radiations and extinctions. However, the group's fossil record is biased. Previous studies have reconstructed temporal patterns in subsampled crocodylomorph palaeobiodiversity, but have not explicitly examined variation in spatial sampling, nor the quality of this record. We compiled a dataset of all taxonomically diagnosable non‐marine crocodylomorph species (393). Based on the number of phylogenetic characters that can be scored for all published fossils of each species, we calculated a completeness value for each taxon. Mean average species completeness (56%) is largely consistent within subgroups and for different body size classes, suggesting no significant biases across the crocodylomorph tree. In general, average completeness values are highest in the Mesozoic, with an overall trend of decreasing completeness through time. Many extant taxa are identified in the fossil record from very incomplete remains, but this might be because their provenance closely matches the species’ present‐day distribution, rather than through autapomorphies. Our understanding of nearly all crocodylomorph macroevolutionary ‘events’ is essentially driven by regional patterns, with no global sampling signal. Palaeotropical sampling is especially poor for most of the group's history. Spatiotemporal sampling bias impedes our understanding of several Mesozoic radiations, whereas molecular divergence times for Crocodylia are generally in close agreement with the fossil record. However, the latter might merely be fortuitous, i.e. divergences happened to occur during our ephemeral spatiotemporal sampling windows

    The use of bioactive factors to enhance bone regeneration. A narrative review.

    No full text
    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Donos, N. , Dereka, X. and Calciolari, E. (2019), The use of bioactive factors to enhance bone regeneration. A narrative review. J Clin Periodontol. Accepted Author Manuscript. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13048, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13048. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived VersionsAimThis reviewcritically appraisesthe available knowledge on the pre-clinical and clinical use of bioactive factorsfor bone regeneration in the cranial and maxillo-facial area.Materials and MethodsThe use of growth factors, amelogenins and autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) for bone regeneration wasreviewedin a systematic manner. More specifically,preclinical and clinical studies on ridge preservation, alveolar ridge augmentation, regeneration of peri-implant defects and sinus augmentation models were considered.ResultsAmongst different bioactive factors, the highest pre-clinical and clinical evidence of a positive effect on bone formation is associated with BMP-2 and the lowest with amelogenins. While APCs seem to accelerate clinical healing and reduce postoperative discomfort, there is insufficient and contrasting evidence of a significant effect on hard tissue regenerationfor the different clinical applications.ConclusionsAlthough there is increasing evidence that bioactive factors might enhance the bone regeneration process, the great heterogeneity of the available studies and the limited number of RCTs do not allow to draw robust conclusions. Issues that still need to be investigated include the optimal carriersfor bioactive agents (direct vs. indirect), the dosage, the timing of administration, as well as the possibility of combining different agents to promote synergistic effects

    The past and future of sustainable concrete: A critical review and new strategies on cement-based materials

    No full text
    corecore