Exploring Emotion Representation to Support Dialogue in Police Training on Child Interviewing

Police officers when dealing with interviewing children have to cope with a complex set of emotions from a vulnerable witness. Triggers for recognising those emotions and how to build rapport are often the basis of learning exercises. However, current training pulls together the full complexity of emotions during role-playing which can be over-whelming and reduce appropriate learning focus. Interestingly a serious game’s interface can provide valuable training not because it represents full complex, multimedia interactions but because it can restrict emotional complexity and increase focus during the interactions on key factors for emotional recognition. The focus of this paper is to report on a specific aspect that was explored during the development of a serious game that aims to address the current police-training needs of child interviewing techniques, where the recognition of emotions plays an important role in understanding how to build rapport with children. The review of literature reveals that emotion recognition, through facial expressions, can contribute significantly to the perceived quality of communication. For this study an ‘emotions map’ was created and tested by 41 participants to be used in the development of a targeted interface design to support the different levels of emotion recognition. The emotions identified were validated with a 70 % agreement across experts and non-experts highlighting the innate role of emotion recognition. A discussion is made around the role of emotions and game-based systems to support their identification for work-based training. As part of the graphical development of the Child Interview Stimulator (CIS) we examined different levels of emotional recognition that can be used to support the in-game graphical representation of a child’s response during a police interview

Measurement of the Bottom-Strange Meson Mixing Phase in the Full CDF Data Set

We report a measurement of the bottom-strange meson mixing phase \beta_s using the time evolution of B0_s -> J/\psi (->\mu+\mu-) \phi (-> K+ K-) decays in which the quark-flavor content of the bottom-strange meson is identified at production. This measurement uses the full data set of proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt(s)= 1.96 TeV collected by the Collider Detector experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron, corresponding to 9.6 fb-1 of integrated luminosity. We report confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of \beta_s and the B0_s decay-width difference \Delta\Gamma_s, and measure \beta_s in [-\pi/2, -1.51] U [-0.06, 0.30] U [1.26, \pi/2] at the 68% confidence level, in agreement with the standard model expectation. Assuming the standard model value of \beta_s, we also determine \Delta\Gamma_s = 0.068 +- 0.026 (stat) +- 0.009 (syst) ps-1 and the mean B0_s lifetime, \tau_s = 1.528 +- 0.019 (stat) +- 0.009 (syst) ps, which are consistent and competitive with determinations by other experiments.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, Phys. Rev. Lett 109, 171802 (2012

Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with five years of the ANTARES detector data

[EN] A search for magnetic monopoles using five years of data recorded with the ANTARES neutrino telescope from January 2008 to December 2012 with a total live time of 1121 days is presented. The analysis is carried out in the range b>0.6 of magnetic monopole velocities using a strategy based on run-by-run Monte Carlo simulations. No signal above the background expectation from atmospheric muons and atmospheric neutrinos is observed, and upper limits are set on the magnetic monopole flux ranging from 5.7x10-16 to 1.5x10-18 cm-2 . s-1.sr-1.The authors acknowledge the financial support of the funding agencies: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives (CEA), Commission Europeenne (FEDER fund and Marie Curie Program), Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), IdEx program and UnivEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cite (ANR-10-LABX-0023 and ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02), Labex OCEVU (ANR-11-LABX-0060) and the A*MIDEX project (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02), Region Ile-de-France (DIM-ACAV), Region Alsace (contrat CPER), Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, Departement du Var and Ville de La Seyne-sur-Mer, France; Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy; Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), Nederlandse organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Netherlands; Council of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and leading scientific schools supporting grants, Russia; National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS), Romania; Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO): Plan Estatal de Investigacion (refs. FPA2015-65150-C3-1-P, -2-P and -3-P, (MINECO/FEDER)), Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence and MultiDark Consolider (MINECO), and Prometeo and Grisolia programs (Generalitat Valenciana), Spain; Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Professional Training, Morocco. We also acknowledge the technical support of Ifremer, AIM and Foselev Marine for the sea operation and the CC-IN2P3 for the computing facilitiesAlbert, A.; Andre, M.; Anghinolfi, M.; Anton, G.; Ardid Ramírez, M.; Aubert, J.; Avgitas, T.... (2017). Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with five years of the ANTARES detector data. Journal of High Energy Physics (Online). (7):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)054S1167P.A.M. Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 133 (1931) 60 [ INSPIRE ].G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276 [ INSPIRE ].A.M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett. 20 (1974) 194 [ INSPIRE ].G. Lazarides, C. Panagiotakopoulos and Q. Shafi, Magnetic Monopoles From Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1707 [ INSPIRE ].Y.M. Cho and D. Maison, Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B 391 (1997) 360 [ hep-th/9601028 ] [INSPIRE].Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Patrignani et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001 [ INSPIRE ].L. Patrizii and M. Spurio, Status of Searches for Magnetic Monopoles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65 (2015) 279 [ arXiv:1510.07125 ] [INSPIRE].ATLAS collaboration, Search for magnetic monopoles and stable particles with high electric charges in 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 052009 [ arXiv:1509.08059 ] [ INSPIRE ].MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya et al., Search for magnetic monopoles with the MoEDAL prototype trapping detector in 8 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2016) 067 [ arXiv:1604.06645 ] [INSPIRE].MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya et al., Search for Magnetic Monopoles with the MoEDAL Forward Trapping Detector in 13 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 061801 [ arXiv:1611.06817 ] [INSPIRE].T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387 [ INSPIRE ].J. Preskill, Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1365 [ INSPIRE ].A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [ INSPIRE ].D. Ryu, H. Kang and P.L. Biermann, Cosmic magnetic fields in large scale filaments and sheets, Astron. Astrophys. 335 (1998) 19 [ astro-ph/9803275 ] [ INSPIRE ].E.N. Parker, The Origin of Magnetic Fields, Astrophys. J 160 (1970) 383.ANTARES collaboration, M. Ageron et al., ANTARES: the first undersea neutrino telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 656 (2011) 11 [ arXiv:1104.1607 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Search for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 634 [ arXiv:1110.2656 ] [ INSPIRE ].IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Searches for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles in IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 133 [ arXiv:1511.01350 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., The data acquisition system for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 570 (2007) 107 [ astro-ph/0610029 ] [INSPIRE].D.R. Tompkins, Total energy loss and Čerenkov emission from monopoles, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B248.Y. Kazama, C.N. Yang and A.S. Goldhaber, Scattering of a Dirac Particle with Charge Ze by a Fixed Magnetic Monopole, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2287 [ INSPIRE ].S.P. Ahlen, Monopole Track Characteristics in Plastic Detectors, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2935 [ INSPIRE ].S.P. Ahlen, Stopping Power Formula for Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 229 [ INSPIRE ].J. Derkaoui et al., Energy losses of magnetic monopoles and of dyons in the earth, Astropart. Phys. 9 (1998) 173 [ INSPIRE ].CERN Application Software Group, GEANT 3.21 Detector Description and Simulation Tool, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013 (1993).G. Carminati, A. Margiotta and M. Spurio, Atmospheric MUons from PArametric formulas: A fast GEnerator for neutrino telescopes (MUPAGE), Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) 915 [ arXiv:0802.0562 ] [INSPIRE].Y. Becherini, A. Margiotta, M. Sioli and M. Spurio, A parameterisation of single and multiple muons in the deep water or ice, Astropart. Phys. 25 (2006) 1 [ hep-ph/0507228 ] [INSPIRE].J. Brunner, ANTARES simulation tools, in proceedings of The VLVnT workshop, Amsterdam (2003), http://www.vlvnt.nl/proceedings.pdf .ANTARES collaboration, A. Margiotta, Common simulation tools for large volume neutrino detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 725 (2013) 98 [ INSPIRE ].V. Agrawal, T.K. Gaisser, P. Lipari and T. Stanev, Atmospheric neutrino flux above 1-GeV, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1314 [ hep-ph/9509423 ] [INSPIRE].G.D. Barr, T.K. Gaisser, S. Robbins and T. Stanev, Uncertainties in Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 094009 [ astro-ph/0611266 ] [INSPIRE].L. Fusco and A. Margiotta, The Run-by-Run Monte Carlo simulation for the ANTARES experiment, EPJ Web Conf. 116 (2016) 02002.ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., A fast algorithm for muon track reconstruction and its application to the ANTARES neutrino telescope, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2011) 652 [ arXiv:1105.4116 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Searches for Point-like and extended neutrino sources close to the Galactic Centre using the ANTARES neutrino Telescope, Astrophys. J. 786 (2014) L5 [ arXiv:1402.6182 ] [INSPIRE].G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873 [ physics/9711021 ] [INSPIRE].G.C. Hill and K. Rawlins, Unbiased cut selection for optimal upper limits in neutrino detectors: The model rejection potential technique, Astropart. Phys. 19 (2003) 393 [ astro-ph/0209350 ] [ INSPIRE ].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., Zenith distribution and flux of atmospheric muons measured with the 5-line ANTARES detector, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2010) 179 [ arXiv:1007.1777 ] [ INSPIRE ].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Measurement of the atmospheric ν μ energy spectrum from 100 GeV to 200 TeV with the ANTARES telescope, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2606 [ arXiv:1308.1599 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., First Search for Point Sources of High Energy Cosmic Neutrinos with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astrophys. J. 743 (2011) L14 [ arXiv:1108.0292 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, P. Amram et al., The ANTARES optical module, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 484 (2002) 369 [ astro-ph/0112172 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., Transmission of light in deep sea water at the site of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 23 (2005) 131 [ astro-ph/0412126 ] [ INSPIRE ].MACRO collaboration, M. Ambrosio et al., Final results of magnetic monopole searches with the MACRO experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 25 (2002) 511 [ hep-ex/0207020 ] [INSPIRE].BAIKAL collaboration, K. Antipin et al., Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with the Baikal Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 29 (2008) 366 [ INSPIRE ].KM3Net collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 084001 [ arXiv:1601.07459 ] [INSPIRE]

Mouse models of neurodegenerative disease: preclinical imaging and neurovascular component.

Neurodegenerative diseases represent great challenges for basic science and clinical medicine because of their prevalence, pathologies, lack of mechanism-based treatments, and impacts on individuals. Translational research might contribute to the study of neurodegenerative diseases. The mouse has become a key model for studying disease mechanisms that might recapitulate in part some aspects of the corresponding human diseases. Neurode- generative disorders are very complicated and multifacto- rial. This has to be taken in account when testing drugs. Most of the drugs screening in mice are very di cult to be interpretated and often useless. Mouse models could be condiderated a ‘pathway models’, rather than as models for the whole complicated construct that makes a human disease. Non-invasive in vivo imaging in mice has gained increasing interest in preclinical research in the last years thanks to the availability of high-resolution single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), high eld Magnetic resonance, Optical Imaging scanners and of highly speci c contrast agents. Behavioral test are useful tool to characterize di erent ani- mal models of neurodegenerative pathology. Furthermore, many authors have observed vascular pathological features associated to the di erent neurodegenerative disorders. Aim of this review is to focus on the di erent existing animal models of neurodegenerative disorders, describe behavioral tests and preclinical imaging techniques used for diagnose and describe the vascular pathological features associated to these diseases

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary.

S

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

Combination of searches for heavy spin-1 resonances using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

A combination of searches for new heavy spin-1 resonances decaying into different pairings of W, Z, or Higgs bosons, as well as directly into leptons or quarks, is presented. The data sample used corresponds to 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collisions at = 13 TeV collected during 2015–2018 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Analyses selecting quark pairs (qq, bb, , and tb) or third-generation leptons (τν and ττ) are included in this kind of combination for the first time. A simplified model predicting a spin-1 heavy vector-boson triplet is used. Cross-section limits are set at the 95% confidence level and are compared with predictions for the benchmark model. These limits are also expressed in terms of constraints on couplings of the heavy vector-boson triplet to quarks, leptons, and the Higgs boson. The complementarity of the various analyses increases the sensitivity to new physics, and the resulting constraints are stronger than those from any individual analysis considered. The data exclude a heavy vector-boson triplet with mass below 5.8 TeV in a weakly coupled scenario, below 4.4 TeV in a strongly coupled scenario, and up to 1.5 TeV in the case of production via vector-boson fusion