Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

A description is provided of the software algorithms developed for the CMS tracker both for reconstructing charged-particle trajectories in proton-proton interactions and for using the resulting tracks to estimate the positions of the LHC luminous region and individual primary-interaction vertices. Despite the very hostile environment at the LHC, the performance obtained with these algorithms is found to be excellent. For tbar t events under typical 2011 pileup conditions, the average track-reconstruction efficiency for promptly-produced charged particles with transverse momenta of pT > 0.9GeV is 94% for pseudorapidities of |η| < 0.9 and 85% for 0.9 < |η| < 2.5. The inefficiency is caused mainly by hadrons that undergo nuclear interactions in the tracker material. For isolated muons, the corresponding efficiencies are essentially 100%. For isolated muons of pT = 100GeV emitted at |η| < 1.4, the resolutions are approximately 2.8% in pT, and respectively, 10μm and 30μm in the transverse and longitudinal impact parameters. The position resolution achieved for reconstructed primary vertices that correspond to interesting pp collisions is 10–12μm in each of the three spatial dimensions. The tracking and vertexing software is fast and flexible, and easily adaptable to other functions, such as fast tracking for the trigger, or dedicated tracking for electrons that takes into account bremsstrahlung

Kinetics of γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle suspension eye drops in tear fluid.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the pageWe have developed nanoparticle γ-cyclodextrin dexamethasone (DexNP) and dorzolamide (DorzNP) eye drops that provide sustained high drug concentrations on the eye surface. To test these characteristics, we measured dexamethasone and dorzolamide levels in tear fluid in humans following eye drop administration.Concentration of dexamethasone was measured by mass spectrometry. One drop of DexNP was instilled into one eye. Tear fluid was sampled with microcapillary pipettes at seven time-points after drop instillation. Control eyes received Maxidex(®) (dexamethasone). The same procedure was performed for dorzolamide with DorzNP and Trusopt(®) .Six subjects were included in each group. The peak concentration (μg/ml ± standard deviation) of dexamethasone for DexNP eye drops (636.6 ± 399.1) was up to 19-fold higher than with Maxidex(®) (39.3 ± 18.9) (p < 0.001). At 4 hr, DexNP was still 10 times higher than Maxidex(®) . In addition, DexNP resulted in about 30-fold higher concentration of dissolved dexamethasone in the tear fluid of extended time period allowing more drug to partition into the eye tissue. The overall concentration of dorzolamide was about 50% higher for DorzNP (59.5 ± 76.9) than Trusopt(®) (40.0 ± 76.7) (p < 0.05).The results indicate high and extended concentration of dissolved dexamethasone with DexNP, which can explain the greater and longer lasting effect of dexamethasone in the cyclodextrin nanoparticle drug delivery platform. Dexamethasone seems to fit the cyclodextrin nanoparticle suspension drug delivery platform with longer duration and higher concentrations in tear fluid than available commercial drops, while dorzolamide is less suitable.the Icelandic research council, Research to prevent blindness in Iceland, Technology Development Fund, Swedish Medical Society, Kempe Fund and Oculis ehf

Dexamethasone eye drops containing γ-cyclodextrin-based nanogels.

To access publisher's full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.Sustained release aqueous eye drops of dexamethasone, based on cyclodextrin (CD) nanogels, were designed and tested in vivo. γCD units were cross-linked in the form of nanogels by means of an emulsification/solvent evaporation process. The composition of the nanogels was optimized with regard to drug loading and release rate. The eye drops consisted of an aqueous solution of dexamethasone in 2-hydroxypropyl-γ-cyclodextrin (HPγCD) medium containing γCD nanogels. The nanogel eye drops (containing 25 mg dexamethasone per ml) were tested in rabbits and compared to the commercially available product Maxidex(®) (suspension with 1 mg dexamethasone per ml). One drop administration of the nanogel eye drops resulted in nearly constant dexamethasone concentration for at least 6h in the tear fluid (mean concentration±SD=295±59 μg/ml) whereas the concentration after administration of Maxidex(®) fell rapidly from 9.72±3.45 μg/ml 1 h after application to 3.76±3.26 μg/ml 3 h after application. The maximum dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous humor (2 h after application) was 136±24 mg/ml after application of the nanogel eye drops, and only 44.4±7.8 μg/ml after application of Maxidex(®). The dexamethasone nanogel eye drops were well tolerated with no macroscopic signs of irritation, redness or other toxic effects.Icelandic Center for Research (RANNIS) MICINN Spain SAF2011-22771 Xunta de Galicia 10CSA203013PR FEDE

Dorzolamide cyclodextrin nanoparticle suspension eye drops and Trusopt in rabbit.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the pageDorzolamide nanoparticle γ-cyclodextrin eye drops may prolong the effect of dorzolamide on intraocular pressure. We test whether the nanoparticle drops have an irritating or toxic effect on the eye in an in vivo rabbit model.Eighteen pigmented rabbits were divided into 4 groups receiving dorzolamide nanoparticle γ-cyclodextrin eye drops×1/day or×2/day, Trusopt® (dorzolamide HCl)×3/day, and untreated controls that received no drops. The rabbits received treatment for 1 month. After sacrifice, 33 eyes and 25 Harderian glands were evaluated for histopathology in a masked way.Mild inflammation was seen in 19/31 eyes and 13/23 Harderian glands. The difference in inflammation (n=eyes/n=glands)between the γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops×1/day (n=5/5),×2/day (n=5/3), Trusopt (n=7/4), or untreated control (n=2/0) groups was nonsignificant in both eyes and glands (P=0.87 and P=0.92) Acute inflammation was seen in 1 Harderian gland that received γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops×2/day. The difference in conjunctival injection between the groups was nonsignificant (P=0.30).Dorzolamide γ-cyclodextrin nanoparticle eye drops are no more locally toxic or irritating to the eye than Trusopt.Icelandic research council Research to prevent blindness in Iceland Technology Development Fund Swedish Medical Society Kempe Fund Oculis eh

Thigh-length compression stockings and DVT after stroke

Controversy exists as to whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with invasive bladder cancer, despite randomised controlled trials of more than 3000 patients. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of such treatment on survival in patients with this disease