On the role of sugar compartmentation and stachyose synthesis in symplastic phloem loading

Im Phloem werden Assimilate von den Source-Organen zu den Sink-Organen der Pflanze transportiert. Bei der Beladung des Phloems mit Assimilaten werden zwei mögliche Mechanismen unterschieden, die als apoplastische und symplastische Phloembeladung bezeichnet werden. Bei Pflanzenarten mit potentiell symplastischer Phloembeladung sind Mesophyllzellen und Phloem durch zahlreiche Plasmodesmata miteinander verbunden, welche einen symplastischen Übertritt der Assimilate erlauben. Diese morphologische Struktur ist korreliert mit dem Transport von Stachyose und Raffinose neben dem von Saccharose. Im Gegensatz dazu fehlen bei apoplastischen Phloembeladern diese symplastischen Verbindungen zwischen beiden Geweben. Die Anwesenheit von Plasmodesmata macht es für die symplastischen Phloembelader notwendig, einen effektiven Mechanismus zu entwickeln, der die Rückdiffusion der Kohlenhydrate aus dem Phloem ins Mesophyll verhindert. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Dissertation war, die mögliche Rolle der Kompartimentierung der Kohlenhydrate und ihrer Synthese bei der Etablierung eines solchen Mechanismus zu untersuchen. Als erstes wurde die subzelluläre Verteilung der Kohlenhydrate in den Mesophyllzellen der Modell-Pflanzen, Alonsoa meridionalis und Asarina barclaiana (Scrophulariaceae) analysiert. Alonsoa ist ein symplastischer Phloembelader und Asarina ein apoplastischer. Im zweiten Teil wurde die Kapazität der Plasmamembran der Blattzellen, unterschiedliche Kohlenhydrate zwischen Apoplasten und Cytosol auszutauschen, in einer Reihe symplastischer und apoplastischer Phloembelader untersucht. Im dritten Teil wurde das Expressionsmuster der Stachyosesynthase in Blättern von Alonsoa meridionalis (AmSTS) auf zellulärer Ebene analysiert. Die Regulation der AmSTS-Expression wurde untersucht, indem der AmSTS Promotor isoliert und AmSTS-GUS Konstrukte in Arabidopsis thaliana exprimiert wurden. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass die subzelluläre Kompartimentierung der Kohlenhydrate in den Mesophyllzellen des symplastischen Phloembeladers Alonsoa und des apoplastischen Phloembeladers Asarina gleich waren. Auch in der Aufnahme-Kapazität für unterschiedliche Kohlenhydrate in Blättern der symplastischen und apoplastischen Phloembelader gab es keine Unterschiede zwischen den beiden Gruppen. Die Geleitzellen (Intermediärzellen) des Phloems in Alonsoa wurden als Ort der AmSTS-Expression und damit der Stachyosesynthese identifiziert. Es wurde weiterhin gezeigt, dass sich die Expression der AmSTS auf die Geleitzellen des Phloems von Source-Organen beschränkt und dass sie über Osmotika reguliert werden kann. Auf Basis dieser Ergebnisse wird diskutiert, ob Stachyose in den Intermediärzellen innerhalb des Endomembran-Komplexen lokalisiert ist, was ihre Rückdiffusion aus den Intermediärzellen ins Mesophyll und damit den Ausgleich des Konzentrationsgradienten zwischen Mesophyll und Phloem verhindern würde

All together now: Cellular and molecular aspects of leaf development in lycophytes, ferns, and seed plants

Recent advances in plant developmental genetics together with rapid accumulation of transcriptomic data on plants from divergent lineages provide an exciting opportunity to explore the evolution of plant morphology. To understand leaf origin in sporophytes of land plants, we have combined the available molecular and structural data on development of leaves with different morphologies in different plant lineages: clubmosses, spikemosses, leptosporangiate ferns, ophioglossioid ferns, marattioid ferns, whisk ferns, horsetails, and conifers. Specifically, we address the peculiarities of proximo-distal, ad/abaxial, and lateral development; presence/absence of mesophyll differentiation into palisade and spongy parenchyma; and type of leaf vascular bundles (collateral and bicollateral). Furthermore, taxon-specific and morphology-specific features of leaf development are considered in the context of the organization of shoot apical meristems (SAMs)—monoplex, simplex, or duplex—that produce leaf primordia. The data available imply that cellular patterns of leaf initiation correlate strongly with the structure of the SAMs but not with further leaf development or morphology. The later stages of leaf development are neither correlated with SAM structure nor with taxonomy. Occurrence and, if available, patterns of expression of homologs of the angiosperm genes responsible for the development of adaxial (ARP and C3HDZ) and abaxial (YABBY and KANADI) leaf domains, or establishment of the leaf marginal meristem (WOX) are discussed. We show that there is no correlation in the set of homologs of TFs that regulate abaxial and adaxial leaf domain development between leaves containing only spongy and no palisade mesophyll (of spikemosses, clubmosses, whisk ferns, horsetails, and most conifers), and leaves differentiated into palisade and spongy mesophyll (of leptosporangiate ferns, Ginkgo, Gnetum, and angiosperms). Expression of three out of four regulators of leaf development in primordia of both leaves and sporangia—C3HDZ in spikemosses and whisk ferns, YABBY in clubmosses and KANADI in spikemosses and horsetails—indicates that a sporangium developmental program could have been co-opted as a “precursor program” for the origin of microphylls and euphylls. Additionally, expression of leaf development regulators in SAMs of spikemosses (ARP, C3HDZ, and KANADI), clubmosses (YABBY), leptosporangiate ferns (C3HDZ), and horsetails (C3HDZ and KANADI) indicates that at least some mechanisms of SAM regulation were co-opted as well in the pre-program of leaf precursors

Arabidopsis SUC1 loads the phloem in suc2 mutants when expressed from the SUC2 promoter

Active loading of sucrose into phloem companion cells (CCs) is an essential process in apoplastic loaders, such as Arabidopsis or tobacco (Nicotiana sp.), and is even used by symplastic loaders such as melon (Cucumis melo) under certain stress conditions. Reduction of the amount or complete removal of the transporters catalysing this transport step results in severe developmental defects. Here we present analyses of two Arabidopsis lines, suc2-4 and suc2-5, that carry a null allele of the SUC2 gene which encodes the Arabidopsis phloem loader. These lines were complemented with constructs expressing either the Arabidopsis SUC1 or the Ustilago maydis srt1 cDNA from the SUC2 promoter. Both SUC1 and Srt1 are energy-dependent sucrose/H+ symporters and differ in specific kinetic properties from the SUC2 protein. Transgene expression was confirmed by RT-PCRs, the subcellular localization of Srt1 in planta with an Srt1-RFP fusion, and the correct CC-specific localization of the recombinant proteins by immunolocalization with anti-Srt1 and anti-SUC1 antisera. The transport capacity of Srt1 was studied in Srt1-GFP expressing Arabidopsis protoplasts. Although both proteins were found exclusively in CCs, only SUC1 complemented the developmental defects of suc2-4 and suc2-5 mutants. As SUC1 and Srt1 are well characterized, this result provides an insight into the properties that are essential for sucrose transporters to load the phloem successfully

Phloem sap and leaf δ13C, carbohydrates, and amino acid concentrations in Eucalyptus globulus change systematically according to flooding and water deficit treatment

Phloem is a central conduit for the distribution of photoassimilate, nutrients, and signals among plant organs. A revised technique was used to collect phloem sap from small woody plants in order to assess changes in composition induced by water deficit and flooding. Bled phloem sap δ13C and sugar concentrations were compared to δ13C of bulk material, soluble carbon extracts, and the neutral sugar fraction from leaves. Amino acid composition and inorganic ions of the phloem sap was also analysed. Quantitative, systematic changes were detected in phloem sap composition and δ13C in response to altered water availability. Phloem sap δ13C was more sensitive to changes of water availability than the δ13C of bulk leaf, the soluble carbon fraction, and the neutral soluble fraction of leaves. Changes in water availability also resulted in significant changes in phloem sugar (sucrose and raffinose), inorganic nutrient (potassium), and amino acid (phenylalanine) concentrations with important implications for the maintenance of phloem function and biomass partitioning. The differences in carbohydrate and amino acid composition as well as the δ13C in the phloem, along with a new model system for phloem research, offer an improved understanding of the phloem-mediated signal, nutrient, and photoassimilate transduction in relation to water availability

Subcellular concentrations of sugar alcohols and sugars in relation to phloem translocation in Plantago major, Plantago maritima, Prunus persica, and Apium graveolens

Sugar and sugar alcohol concentrations were analyzed in subcellular compartments of mesophyll cells, in the apoplast, and in the phloem sap of leaves of Plantago major (common plantain), Plantago maritima (sea plantain), Prunus persica (peach) and Apium graveolens (celery). In addition to sucrose, common plantain, sea plantain, and peach also translocated substantial amounts of sorbitol, whereas celery translocated mannitol as well. Sucrose was always present in vacuole and cytosol of mesophyll cells, whereas sorbitol and mannitol were found in vacuole, stroma, and cytosol in all cases except for sea plantain. The concentration of sorbitol, mannitol and sucrose in phloem sap was 2- to 40-fold higher than that in the cytosol of mesophyll cells. Apoplastic carbohydrate concentrations in all species tested were in the low millimolar range versus high millimolar concentrations in symplastic compartments. Therefore, the concentration ratios between the apoplast and the phloem were very strong, ranging between 20- to 100-fold for sorbitol and mannitol, and between 200- and 2000-fold for sucrose. The woody species, peach, showed the smallest concentration ratios between the cytosol of mesophyll cells and the phloem as well as between the apoplast and the phloem, suggesting a mixture of apoplastic and symplastic phloem loading, in contrast to the herbal plant species (common plantain, sea plantain, celery) which likely exhibit an active loading mode for sorbitol and mannitol as well as sucrose from the apoplast into the phloem

Phloem sap intricacy and interplay with aphid feeding

Aphididae feed upon the plant sieve elements (SE), where they ingest sugars, nitrogen compounds and other nutrients. For ingestion, aphid stylets penetrate SE, and because of the high hydrostatic pressure in SE, phloem sap exudes out into the stylets. Severing stylets to sample phloem exudates (i.e. stylectomy) has been used extensively for the study of phloem contents. Alternative sampling techniques are spontaneous exudation upon wounding that only works in a few plant species, and the popular EDTA-facilitated exudation technique. These approaches have allowed fundamental advances on the understanding of phloem sap composition and sieve tube physiology, which are surveyed in this review. A more complete picture of metabolites, ions, proteins and RNAs present in phloem sap is now available, which has provided large evidence for the phloem role as a signalling network in addition to its primary role in partitioning of photo-assimilates. Thus, phloem sap sampling methods can have remarkable applications to analyse plant nutrition, physiology and defence responses. Since aphid behaviour is suspected to be affected by phloem sap quality, attempts to manipulate phloem sap content were recently undertaken based on deregulation in mutant plants of genes controlling amino acid or sugar content of phloem sap. This opens up new strategies to control aphid settlement on a plant host

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Allocation, stress tolerance and carbon transport in plants: How does phloem physiology affect plant ecology?

Despite the crucial role of carbon transport in whole plant physiology and its impact on plant-environment interactions and ecosystem function, relatively little research has tried to examine how phloem physiology impacts plant ecology. In this review, we highlight several areas of active research where inquiry into phloem physiology has increased our understanding of whole plant function and ecological processes. We consider how xylem-phloem interactions impact plant drought tolerance and reproduction, how phloem transport influences carbon allocation in trees and carbon cycling in ecosystems, and how phloem function mediates plant relations with insects, pests, microbes and symbiotes. We argue that in spite of challenges that exist in studying phloem physiology, it is critical that we consider the role of this dynamic vascular system when examining the relationship between plants and their biotic and abiotic environment