8 research outputs found
High light and temperature reduce photosynthetic efficiency through different mechanisms in the C4 model Setaria viridis.
Funder: start-up funding from Donald Danforth Plant Science CenterC4 plants frequently experience high light and high temperature conditions in the field, which reduce growth and yield. However, the mechanisms underlying these stress responses in C4 plants have been under-explored, especially the coordination between mesophyll (M) and bundle sheath (BS) cells. We investigated how the C4 model plant Setaria viridis responded to a four-hour high light or high temperature treatment at photosynthetic, transcriptomic, and ultrastructural levels. Although we observed a comparable reduction of photosynthetic efficiency in high light or high temperature treated leaves, detailed analysis of multi-level responses revealed important differences in key pathways and M/BS specificity responding to high light and high temperature. We provide a systematic analysis of high light and high temperature responses in S. viridis, reveal different acclimation strategies to these two stresses in C4 plants, discover unique light/temperature responses in C4 plants in comparison to C3 plants, and identify potential targets to improve abiotic stress tolerance in C4 crops
High light and temperature reduce photosynthetic efficiency through different mechanisms in the C4 model Setaria viridis
Photochemical Barcodes
A photochemical strategy to encode
fluorescence signals <i>in vivo</i> with spatial control
was designed around the unique
properties of a photoactivatable borondipyrromethene (BODIPY). The
photoinduced disconnection of two oxazines, flanking a single BODIPY,
in two consecutive steps produces a mixture of three emissive molecules
with resolved fluorescence inside polymer beads. The relative amounts
and emission intensities of the three fluorophores can be regulated
precisely in each bead by adjusting the dose of activating photons
to mark individual particles with distinct codes of fluorescence signals.
The visible wavelengths and mild illumination sufficient to induce
these transformations permit the photochemical barcoding of beads
also in living nematodes. Different regions of the same animal can
be labeled with distinct barcodes to allow the monitoring of their
dynamics for long times with no toxic effects. Thus, our photochemical
strategy for the generation of fluorescence barcodes can produce multiple
and distinguishable labels in the same biological sample to enable
the spatiotemporal tracking of, otherwise indistinguishable, targets
Photochemical Barcodes
A photochemical strategy to encode
fluorescence signals <i>in vivo</i> with spatial control
was designed around the unique
properties of a photoactivatable borondipyrromethene (BODIPY). The
photoinduced disconnection of two oxazines, flanking a single BODIPY,
in two consecutive steps produces a mixture of three emissive molecules
with resolved fluorescence inside polymer beads. The relative amounts
and emission intensities of the three fluorophores can be regulated
precisely in each bead by adjusting the dose of activating photons
to mark individual particles with distinct codes of fluorescence signals.
The visible wavelengths and mild illumination sufficient to induce
these transformations permit the photochemical barcoding of beads
also in living nematodes. Different regions of the same animal can
be labeled with distinct barcodes to allow the monitoring of their
dynamics for long times with no toxic effects. Thus, our photochemical
strategy for the generation of fluorescence barcodes can produce multiple
and distinguishable labels in the same biological sample to enable
the spatiotemporal tracking of, otherwise indistinguishable, targets
Photochemical Barcodes
A photochemical strategy to encode
fluorescence signals <i>in vivo</i> with spatial control
was designed around the unique
properties of a photoactivatable borondipyrromethene (BODIPY). The
photoinduced disconnection of two oxazines, flanking a single BODIPY,
in two consecutive steps produces a mixture of three emissive molecules
with resolved fluorescence inside polymer beads. The relative amounts
and emission intensities of the three fluorophores can be regulated
precisely in each bead by adjusting the dose of activating photons
to mark individual particles with distinct codes of fluorescence signals.
The visible wavelengths and mild illumination sufficient to induce
these transformations permit the photochemical barcoding of beads
also in living nematodes. Different regions of the same animal can
be labeled with distinct barcodes to allow the monitoring of their
dynamics for long times with no toxic effects. Thus, our photochemical
strategy for the generation of fluorescence barcodes can produce multiple
and distinguishable labels in the same biological sample to enable
the spatiotemporal tracking of, otherwise indistinguishable, targets
Thigh-length compression stockings and DVT after stroke
Controversy exists as to whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with invasive bladder cancer, despite randomised controlled trials of more than 3000 patients. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of such treatment on survival in patients with this disease
Azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Background Azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatory actions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Methods In this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once per day by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatment groups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment and were twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to the outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936. Findings Between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) were eligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was 65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomly allocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall, 561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median 10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, no significant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24). Interpretation In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or other prespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restricted to patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication. Funding UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council) and National Institute of Health Research