Increased epidermal thickness and abnormal epidermal differentiation in keloid scars

Background: The pathogenesis underlying keloid formation is still poorly understood. Research has focused mostly on dermal abnormalities, while the epidermis has not yet been studied. Objectives: To identify differences within the epidermis of mature keloid scars compared with normal skin and mature normotrophic and hypertrophic scars. Methods: Rete ridge formation and epidermal thickness were evaluated in tissue sections. Epidermal proliferation was assessed using immunohistochemistry (Ki67, keratins 6, 16 and 17) and with an in vitro proliferation assay. Epidermal differentiation was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (keratin 10, involucrin, loricrin, filaggrin, SPRR2, SKALP), reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (involucrin) and transmission electron microscopy (stratum corneum). Results: All scars showed flattening of the epidermis. A trend of increasing epidermal thickness correlating to increasing scar abnormality was observed when comparing normal skin, normotrophic scars, hypertrophic scars and keloids. No difference in epidermal proliferation was observed. Only the early differentiation marker involucrin showed abnormal expression in scars. Involucrin was restricted to the granular layer in healthy skin, but showed panepidermal expression in keloids. Normotrophic scars expressed involucrin in the granular and upper spinous layers, while hypertrophic scars resembled normotrophic scars or keloids. Abnormal differentiation was associated with ultrastructural disorganization of the stratum corneum in keloids compared with normal skin. Conclusions: Keloids showed increased epidermal thickness compared with normal skin and normotrophic and hypertrophic scars. This was not due to hyperproliferation, but possibly caused by abnormal early terminal differentiation, which affects stratum corneum formation. Our findings indicate that the epidermis is associated with keloid pathogenesis and identify involucrin as a potential diagnostic marker for abnormal scarring

A Novel Mutation in the Upstream Open Reading Frame of the CDKN1B Gene Causes a MEN4 Phenotype

PubMed ID: 23555276This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Measurement of the Bottom-Strange Meson Mixing Phase in the Full CDF Data Set

We report a measurement of the bottom-strange meson mixing phase \beta_s using the time evolution of B0_s -> J/\psi (->\mu+\mu-) \phi (-> K+ K-) decays in which the quark-flavor content of the bottom-strange meson is identified at production. This measurement uses the full data set of proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt(s)= 1.96 TeV collected by the Collider Detector experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron, corresponding to 9.6 fb-1 of integrated luminosity. We report confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of \beta_s and the B0_s decay-width difference \Delta\Gamma_s, and measure \beta_s in [-\pi/2, -1.51] U [-0.06, 0.30] U [1.26, \pi/2] at the 68% confidence level, in agreement with the standard model expectation. Assuming the standard model value of \beta_s, we also determine \Delta\Gamma_s = 0.068 +- 0.026 (stat) +- 0.009 (syst) ps-1 and the mean B0_s lifetime, \tau_s = 1.528 +- 0.019 (stat) +- 0.009 (syst) ps, which are consistent and competitive with determinations by other experiments.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, Phys. Rev. Lett 109, 171802 (2012

Annexin A2 Binds RNA and Reduces the Frameshifting Efficiency of Infectious Bronchitis Virus

Annexin A2 (ANXA2) is a protein implicated in diverse cellular functions, including exocytosis, DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. It was recently proposed to be involved in RNA metabolism because it was shown to associate with some cellular mRNA. Here, we identified ANXA2 as a RNA binding protein (RBP) that binds IBV (Infectious Bronchitis Virus) pseudoknot RNA. We first confirmed the binding of ANXA2 to IBV pseudoknot RNA by ultraviolet crosslinking and showed its binding to RNA pseudoknot with ANXA2 protein in vitro and in the cells. Since the RNA pseudoknot located in the frameshifting region of IBV was used as bait for cellular RBPs, we tested whether ANXA2 could regulate the frameshfting of IBV pseudoknot RNA by dual luciferase assay. Overexpression of ANXA2 significantly reduced the frameshifting efficiency from IBV pseudoknot RNA and knockdown of the protein strikingly increased the frameshifting efficiency. The results suggest that ANXA2 is a cellular RBP that can modulate the frameshifting efficiency of viral RNA, enabling it to act as an anti-viral cellular protein, and hinting at roles in RNA metabolism for other cellular mRNAs

Computational Modeling and Analysis of Insulin Induced Eukaryotic Translation Initiation

Insulin, the primary hormone regulating the level of glucose in the bloodstream, modulates a variety of cellular and enzymatic processes in normal and diseased cells. Insulin signals are processed by a complex network of biochemical interactions which ultimately induce gene expression programs or other processes such as translation initiation. Surprisingly, despite the wealth of literature on insulin signaling, the relative importance of the components linking insulin with translation initiation remains unclear. We addressed this question by developing and interrogating a family of mathematical models of insulin induced translation initiation. The insulin network was modeled using mass-action kinetics within an ordinary differential equation (ODE) framework. A family of model parameters was estimated, starting from an initial best fit parameter set, using 24 experimental data sets taken from literature. The residual between model simulations and each of the experimental constraints were simultaneously minimized using multiobjective optimization. Interrogation of the model population, using sensitivity and robustness analysis, identified an insulin-dependent switch that controlled translation initiation. Our analysis suggested that without insulin, a balance between the pro-initiation activity of the GTP-binding protein Rheb and anti-initiation activity of PTEN controlled basal initiation. On the other hand, in the presence of insulin a combination of PI3K and Rheb activity controlled inducible initiation, where PI3K was only critical in the presence of insulin. Other well known regulatory mechanisms governing insulin action, for example IRS-1 negative feedback, modulated the relative importance of PI3K and Rheb but did not fundamentally change the signal flow

Carnosine:can understanding its actions on energy metabolism and protein homeostasis inform its therapeutic potential?

The dipeptide carnosine (β-alanyl-L-histidine) has contrasting but beneficial effects on cellular activity. It delays cellular senescence and rejuvenates cultured senescent mammalian cells. However, it also inhibits the growth of cultured tumour cells. Based on studies in several organisms, we speculate that carnosine exerts these apparently opposing actions by affecting energy metabolism and/or protein homeostasis (proteostasis). Specific effects on energy metabolism include the dipeptide's influence on cellular ATP concentrations. Carnosine's ability to reduce the formation of altered proteins (typically adducts of methylglyoxal) and enhance proteolysis of aberrant polypeptides is indicative of its influence on proteostasis. Furthermore these dual actions might provide a rationale for the use of carnosine in the treatment or prevention of diverse age-related conditions where energy metabolism or proteostasis are compromised. These include cancer, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and the complications of type-2 diabetes (nephropathy, cataracts, stroke and pain), which might all benefit from knowledge of carnosine's mode of action on human cells. © 2013 Hipkiss et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

An Internal Ribosome Entry Site Directs Translation of the 39-Gene from Pelargonium Flower Break Virus Genomic RNA: Implications for Infectivity

[EN] Pelargonium flower break virus (PFBV, genus Carmovirus) has a single-stranded positive-sense genomic RNA (gRNA) which contains five ORFs. The two 59-proximal ORFs encode the replicases, two internal ORFs encode movement proteins, and the 39-proximal ORF encodes a polypeptide (p37) which plays a dual role as capsid protein and as suppressor of RNA silencing. Like other members of family Tombusviridae, carmoviruses express ORFs that are not 59-proximal from subgenomic RNAs. However, in one case, corresponding to Hisbiscus chlorotic ringspot virus, it has been reported that the 39-proximal gene can be translated from the gRNA through an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). Here we show that PFBV also holds an IRES that mediates production of p37 from the gRNA, raising the question of whether this translation strategy may be conserved in the genus. The PFBV IRES was functional both in vitro and in vivo and either in the viral context or when inserted into synthetic bicistronic constructs. Through deletion and mutagenesis studies we have found that the IRES is contained within a 80 nt segment and have identified some structural traits that influence IRES function. Interestingly, mutations that diminish IRES activity strongly reduced the infectivity of the virus while the progress of the infection was favoured by mutations potentiating such activity. These results support the biological significance of the IRES-driven p37 translation and suggest that production of the silencing suppressor from the gRNA might allow the virus to early counteract the defence response of the host, thus facilitating pathogen multiplication and spread.This research was supported by grants BFU2006-11230 and BFU2009-11699 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) and by grants ACOM/2006/210 and ACOMP/2009/040 (to CH) and GVPRE/2008/121 (to OF-M) from the Generalitat Valenciana. The latter was the recipient of an I3P postdoctoral contract from the Spanish Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and an additional contract from MICINN. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Fernandez Miragall, O.; Hernandez Fort, C. (2011). An Internal Ribosome Entry Site Directs Translation of the 39-Gene from Pelargonium Flower Break Virus Genomic RNA: Implications for Infectivity. PLoS ONE. 6(7):22617-22617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022617S226172261767Gallie, D. R. (1996). Translational control of cellular and viral mRNAs. Plant Molecular Biology, 32(1-2), 145-158. doi:10.1007/bf00039381Kozak, M. (2002). Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation. Gene, 299(1-2), 1-34. doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(02)01056-9Sachs, A. B., Sarnow, P., & Hentze, M. W. (1997). Starting at the Beginning, Middle, and End: Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes. Cell, 89(6), 831-838. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80268-8Kozak, M. (1992). Regulation of Translation in Eukaryotic Systems. Annual Review of Cell Biology, 8(1), 197-225. doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001213Sonenberg, N., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (2009). Regulation of Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms and Biological Targets. Cell, 136(4), 731-745. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042F�tterer, J., & Hohn, T. (1996). Translation in plants-rules and exceptions. Plant Molecular Biology, 32(1-2), 159-189. doi:10.1007/bf00039382Gale, M., Tan, S.-L., & Katze, M. G. (2000). Translational Control of Viral Gene Expression in Eukaryotes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(2), 239-280. doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.2.239-280.2000Kozak, M. (2001). Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals. Nucleic Acids Research, 29(24), 5226-5232. doi:10.1093/nar/29.24.5226Pelletier, J., & Sonenberg, N. (1988). Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA. Nature, 334(6180), 320-325. doi:10.1038/334320a0Mokrejš, M., Mašek, T., Vopálenský, V., Hlubuček, P., Delbos, P., & Pospíšek, M. (2009). IRESite—a tool for the examination of viral and cellular internal ribosome entry sites. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(suppl_1), D131-D136. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp981Basso, J., Dallaire, P., Charest, P. J., Devantier, Y., & Laliberte, J.-F. (1994). Evidence for an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Within the 5’ Non-translated Region of Turnip Mosaic Potyvirus RNA. Journal of General Virology, 75(11), 3157-3165. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157Levis, C., & Astier-Manifacier, S. (1993). The 5′ untranslated region of PVY RNA, even located in an internal position, enables initiation of translation. Virus Genes, 7(4), 367-379. doi:10.1007/bf01703392Karetnikov, A., & Lehto, K. (2007). The RNA2 5’ leader of Blackcurrant reversion virus mediates efficient in vivo translation through an internal ribosomal entry site mechanism. Journal of General Virology, 88(1), 286-297. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82307-0Ivanov, P. A., Karpova, O. V., Skulachev, M. V., Tomashevskaya, O. L., Rodionova, N. P., Dorokhov, Y. L., & Atabekov, J. G. (1997). A Tobamovirus Genome That Contains an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Functionalin Vitro. Virology, 232(1), 32-43. doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8525Skulachev, M. V., Ivanov, P. A., Karpova, O. V., Korpela, T., Rodionova, N. P., Dorokhov, Y. L., & Atabekov, J. G. (1999). Internal Initiation of Translation Directed by the 5′-Untranslated Region of the Tobamovirus Subgenomic RNA I2. Virology, 263(1), 139-154. doi:10.1006/viro.1999.9928Jaag, H. M., Kawchuk, L., Rohde, W., Fischer, R., Emans, N., & Prufer, D. (2003). An unusual internal ribosomal entry site of inverted symmetry directs expression of a potato leafroll polerovirus replication-associated protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 8939-8944. doi:10.1073/pnas.1332697100Balvay, L., Rifo, R. S., Ricci, E. P., Decimo, D., & Ohlmann, T. (2009). Structural and functional diversity of viral IRESes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 1789(9-10), 542-557. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.07.005Kneller, E. L. P., Rakotondrafara, A. M., & Miller, W. A. (2006). Cap-independent translation of plant viral RNAs. Virus Research, 119(1), 63-75. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2005.10.010Rico, P., & Hern�ndez, C. (2004). Complete nucleotide sequence and genome organization of Pelargonium flower break virus. Archives of Virology, 149(3), 641-651. doi:10.1007/s00705-003-0231-5Martinez-Turino, S., & Hernandez, C. (2010). Identification and characterization of RNA-binding activity in the ORF1-encoded replicase protein of Pelargonium flower break virus. Journal of General Virology, 91(12), 3075-3084. doi:10.1099/vir.0.023093-0Martínez-Turiño, S., & Hernández, C. (2011). A membrane-associated movement protein of Pelargonium flower break virus shows RNA-binding activity and contains a biologically relevant leucine zipper-like motif. Virology, 413(2), 310-319. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2011.03.001Martinez-Turino, S., & Hernandez, C. (2009). Inhibition of RNA silencing by the coat protein of Pelargonium flower break virus: distinctions from closely related suppressors. Journal of General Virology, 90(2), 519-525. doi:10.1099/vir.0.006098-0Rico, P., & Hernández, C. (2009). Characterization of the subgenomic RNAs produced by Pelargonium flower break virus: Identification of two novel RNAs species. Virus Research, 142(1-2), 100-107. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2009.01.018Koh, D. C.-Y., Wong, S.-M., & Liu, D. X. (2003). Synergism of the 3′-Untranslated Region and an Internal Ribosome Entry Site Differentially Enhances the Translation of a Plant Virus Coat Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(23), 20565-20573. doi:10.1074/jbc.m210212200Hellen, C. U. T. (2001). Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mRNA molecules. Genes & Development, 15(13), 1593-1612. doi:10.1101/gad.891101Martínez-Salas, E. (1999). Internal ribosome entry site biology and its use in expression vectors. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 10(5), 458-464. doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00010-5Dobrikova, E., Florez, P., Bradrick, S., & Gromeier, M. (2003). Activity of a type 1 picornavirus internal ribosomal entry site is determined by sequences within the 3’ nontranslated region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(25), 15125-15130. doi:10.1073/pnas.2436464100Belsham, G. J. (2009). Divergent picornavirus IRES elements. Virus Research, 139(2), 183-192. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.001Fernández-Miragall, O., Quinto, S. L. de, & Martínez-Salas, E. (2009). Relevance of RNA structure for the activity of picornavirus IRES elements. Virus Research, 139(2), 172-182. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.07.009Pestova, T. V., Kolupaeva, V. G., Lomakin, I. B., Pilipenko, E. V., Shatsky, I. N., Agol, V. I., & Hellen, C. U. T. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(13), 7029-7036. doi:10.1073/pnas.111145798FERNANDEZ-MIRAGALL, O. (2003). Structural organization of a viral IRES depends on the integrity of the GNRA motif. RNA, 9(11), 1333-1344. doi:10.1261/rna.5950603ROBERTSON, M. E. M., SEAMONS, R. A., & BELSHAM, G. J. (1999). A selection system for functional internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements: Analysis of the requirement for a conserved GNRA tetraloop in the encephalomyocarditis virus IRES. RNA, 5(9), 1167-1179. doi:10.1017/s1355838299990301Dorokhov, Y. L., Skulachev, M. V., Ivanov, P. A., Zvereva, S. D., Tjulkina, L. G., Merits, A., … Atabekov, J. G. (2002). Polypurine (A)-rich sequences promote cross-kingdom conservation of internal ribosome entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(8), 5301-5306. doi:10.1073/pnas.082107599Xia, X., & Holcik, M. (2009). Strong Eukaryotic IRESs Have Weak Secondary Structure. PLoS ONE, 4(1), e4136. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004136Lu, J., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Jiang, H., Liu, C., & Hu, Y. (2006). In vitro and in vivo identification of structural and sequence elements in the 5’ untranslated region of Ectropis obliqua picorna-like virus required for internal initiation. Journal of General Virology, 87(12), 3667-3677. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82090-0Yang, L. J., Hidaka, M., Sonoda, J., Masaki, H., & Uozumi, T. (1997). Mutational Analysis of the Potato Virus Y 5′ Untranslated Region for Alteration in Translational Enhancement in Tobacco Protoplasts. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 61(12), 2131-2133. doi:10.1271/bbb.61.2131BERGAMINI, G., PREISS, T., & HENTZE, M. W. (2000). Picornavirus IRESes and the poly(A) tail jointly promote cap-independent translation in a mammalian cell-free system. RNA, 6(12), 1781-1790. doi:10.1017/s1355838200001679Bradrick, S. S. (2006). The hepatitis C virus 3’-untranslated region or a poly(A) tract promote efficient translation subsequent to the initiation phase. Nucleic Acids Research, 34(4), 1293-1303. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl019Lopez de Quinto, S. (2002). IRES-driven translation is stimulated separately by the FMDV 3’-NCR and poly(A) sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(20), 4398-4405. doi:10.1093/nar/gkf569Song, Y., Friebe, P., Tzima, E., Junemann, C., Bartenschlager, R., & Niepmann, M. (2006). The Hepatitis C Virus RNA 3’-Untranslated Region Strongly Enhances Translation Directed by the Internal Ribosome Entry Site. Journal of Virology, 80(23), 11579-11588. doi:10.1128/jvi.00675-06Koh, D. C.-Y., Liu, D. X., & Wong, S.-M. (2002). A Six-Nucleotide Segment within the 3’ Untranslated Region of Hibiscus Chlorotic Ringspot Virus Plays an Essential Role in Translational Enhancement. Journal of Virology, 76(3), 1144-1153. doi:10.1128/jvi.76.3.1144-1153.2002Stupina, V. A., Meskauskas, A., McCormack, J. C., Yingling, Y. G., Shapiro, B. A., Dinman, J. D., & Simon, A. E. (2008). The 3’ proximal translational enhancer of Turnip crinkle virus binds to 60S ribosomal subunits. RNA, 14(11), 2379-2393. doi:10.1261/rna.1227808Truniger, V., Nieto, C., González-Ibeas, D., & Aranda, M. (2008). Mechanism of plant eIF4E-mediated resistance against a Carmovirus (Tombusviridae): cap-independent translation of a viral RNA controlledin cisby an (a)virulence determinant. The Plant Journal, 56(5), 716-727. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03630.xMiller, W. A., Wang, Z., & Treder, K. (2007). The amazing diversity of cap-independent translation elements in the 3′-untranslated regions of plant viral RNAs. Biochemical Society Transactions, 35(6), 1629-1633. doi:10.1042/bst0351629Miller, W. A., & White, K. A. (2006). Long-Distance RNA-RNA Interactions in Plant Virus Gene Expression and Replication. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 44(1), 447-467. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143353Koh, D. C.-Y., Wang, X., Wong, S.-M., & Liu, D. X. (2006). Translation initiation at an upstream CUG codon regulates the expression of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus coat protein. Virus Research, 122(1-2), 35-44. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2006.06.008Castaño, A., Ruiz, L., & Hernández, C. (2009). Insights into the translational regulation of biologically active open reading frames of Pelargonium line pattern virus. Virology, 386(2), 417-426. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.017Fraser, C. S., & Doudna, J. A. (2006). Structural and mechanistic insights into hepatitis C viral translation initiation. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(1), 29-38. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1558LÓPEZ-LASTRA, M., RIVAS, A., & BARRÍA, M. I. (2005). Protein synthesis in eukaryotes: The growing biological relevance of cap-independent translation initiation. Biological Research, 38(2-3). doi:10.4067/s0716-97602005000200003Pacheco, A., & Martinez-Salas, E. (2010). Insights into the Biology of IRES Elements through Riboproteomic Approaches. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, 2010, 1-12. doi:10.1155/2010/458927Bernstein, J., Sella, O., Le, S.-Y., & Elroy-Stein, O. (1997). PDGF2/c-sismRNA Leader Contains a Differentiation-linked Internal Ribosomal Entry Site (D-IRES). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(14), 9356-9362. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.14.9356Scheper, G. C., Voorma, H. O., & Thomas, A. A. M. (1994). Basepairing with 18S ribosomal RNA in internal initiation of translation. FEBS Letters, 352(3), 271-275. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(94)00975-9Dresios, J., Chappell, S. A., Zhou, W., & Mauro, V. P. (2005). An mRNA-rRNA base-pairing mechanism for translation initiation in eukaryotes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 13(1), 30-34. doi:10.1038/nsmb1031Reigadas, S., Pacheco, A., Ramajo, J., de Quinto, S. L., & Martinez-Salas, E. (2005). Specific interference between two unrelated internal ribosome entry site elements impairs translation efficiency. FEBS Letters, 579(30), 6803-6808. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.015Ishitani, M., Xiong, L., Stevenson, B., & Zhu, J. K. (1997). Genetic analysis of osmotic and cold stress signal transduction in Arabidopsis: interactions and convergence of abscisic acid-dependent and abscisic acid-independent pathways. The Plant Cell, 9(11), 1935-1949. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.11.1935Knoester, M., van Loon, L. C., van den Heuvel, J., Hennig, J., Bol, J. F., & Linthorst, H. J. M. (1998). Ethylene-insensitive tobacco lacks nonhost resistance against soil-borne fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(4), 1933-1937. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1933Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999). Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 288(5), 911-940. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700Zuker, M. (2003). Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13), 3406-3415. doi:10.1093/nar/gkg59

CropPol: a dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination

This is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record The original dataset (v1.1.0) of the CropPol database can be accessed from the ECOLOGY repository. Main upgrades of these datasets will be versioned and deposited in Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5546600)Data availability. V.C. Computer programs and data-processing algorithms: The algorithms used in deriving, processing, or transforming data can be accessed in the DataS1.zip file and the Zenodo repository (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5546600). V.D. Archiving: The data is archived for long-term storage and access in Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5546600)Seventy five percent of the world's food crops benefit from insect pollination. Hence, there has been increased interest in how global change drivers impact this critical ecosystem service. Because standardized data on crop pollination are rarely available, we are limited in our capacity to understand the variation in pollination benefits to crop yield, as well as to anticipate changes in this service, develop predictions, and inform management actions. Here, we present CropPol, a dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination. It contains measurements recorded from 202 crop studies, covering 3,394 field observations, 2,552 yield measurements (i.e. berry weight, number of fruits and kg per hectare, among others), and 47,752 insect records from 48 commercial crops distributed around the globe. CropPol comprises 32 of the 87 leading global crops and commodities that are pollinator dependent. Malus domestica is the most represented crop (32 studies), followed by Brassica napus (22 studies), Vaccinium corymbosum (13 studies), and Citrullus lanatus (12 studies). The most abundant pollinator guilds recorded are honey bees (34.22% counts), bumblebees (19.19%), flies other than Syrphidae and Bombyliidae (13.18%), other wild bees (13.13%), beetles (10.97%), Syrphidae (4.87%), and Bombyliidae (0.05%). Locations comprise 34 countries distributed among Europe (76 studies), Northern America (60), Latin America and the Caribbean (29), Asia (20), Oceania (10), and Africa (7). Sampling spans three decades and is concentrated on 2001-05 (21 studies), 2006-10 (40), 2011-15 (88), and 2016-20 (50). This is the most comprehensive open global data set on measurements of crop flower visitors, crop pollinators and pollination to date, and we encourage researchers to add more datasets to this database in the future. This data set is released for non-commercial use only. Credits should be given to this paper (i.e., proper citation), and the products generated with this database should be shared under the same license terms (CC BY-NC-SA). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.OBServ Projec