Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Clinical registries to evaluate the patterns of care and outcomes of patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

This thesis analyses the use of registries in patients diagnosed with cancer of the lining of the kidneys and ureter and creates an online registry to efficiently analyse how patients are treated, their outcomes and where improvements in care are possible. It uses the developed registry to analyse a large cohort of patients who were previously diagnosed with this cancer to determine how they were evaluated and treated and if improvements to care are possible. It goes on to initiate the registry use across multiple health sites in Australia to better understand the patterns of care

The Utility of Intraluminal Therapies in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) is considered for selected cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as it maintains renal function and avoids morbidity associated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The appropriate selection of patients suitable for NSS without compromising oncological outcomes can sometimes be difficult, given the limitations of diagnostic modalities. Recurrence rates for UTUC can be as high as 36 to 54% after NSS. Intraluminal adjuvant therapy can be attempted following NSS to reduce recurrence, but delivery to the upper tract is more challenging than into the bladder. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and chemotherapy such as Mitomycin (MMC) have been administered via nephrostomy or ureteric catheter, which requires invasive/repeated instrumentation of the upper urinary tract. Drug delivery by reflux from bladder instillation along indwelling stents has also been tried but can potentially be unreliable. Recently, a gel formulation of mitomycin has been developed for the controlled exposure of the upper urinary tract to treatment over a number of hours. Drug-eluting stents to deliver chemotherapy to the upper urinary tract have been developed but have not yet entered clinical practice. Endoluminal phototherapy utilising an intravenous photosensitising agent is another novel approach that has recently been described. Intraluminal therapies may be beneficial in decreasing recurrence rates in UTUC, but currently have some limitations in their usage

Understanding the long‐term impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer outcomes: 12‐Month follow‐up data from the international, prospective COVIDSurg Cancer study

Objective: The objective of this study was to report the 12-month oncological outcomes for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) within the prospective, international COVIDSurg Cancer study. Patients and methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and scheduled for elective surgical management of NMIBC with curative intent (transurethral resection of bladder tumour [TURBT] or bladder biopsy) from 21 January to 14 April 2020. The primary outcome was disease recurrence within 12 months of previous elective TURBT/bladder biopsy. Secondary outcomes included disease progression within 12 months of previous elective TURBT/bladder biopsy, site-declared delay to surgery from diagnosis as a consequence of COVID-19 and deviation in standard care due to COVID-19. Comparisons were made to cohorts from the pre-pandemic era. Results: Bladder cancer accounted for 2.2% (n = 446) of patients in the COVIDSurg Cancer study, with data contributed by 27 centres across 12 countries internationally. Within this included cohort, 229 patients had NMIBC and 12-month follow-up data available. On application of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria, 47.2% were classified as having high-risk disease. Overall disease recurrence and progression rates were 29.3% and 9.7% at 12 months, respectively. In purely high-risk pre-pandemic cohorts, the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) estimates a recurrence rate of 25% at 12 months, and the European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC 2021 scoring model estimates a 12-month progression rate of 3.5%. As a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, 10.9% of patients had site-declared delay to TURBT/bladder biopsy; 7.4% did not undergo intravesical therapy or had early discontinuation of this; 9.2% did not undergo early repeat resection for high-risk disease; and 18.3% had a delay to cystoscopic follow-up surveillance. Conclusions: This prospective study indicates that there were widespread deviations in usual care for NMIBC during the pandemic and that 12-month oncological outcomes appear to be impaired compared to published pre-pandemic outcomes