Mechanical Percussion Devices: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Healthcare Professionals

# Background Mechanical percussion devices have become popular among sports medicine professionals. These devices provide a similar effect as manual percussion or tapotement used in therapeutic massage. To date, there are few published studies or evidence-based guidelines for these devices. There is a need to understand what professionals believe about this technology and how they use these devices in clinical practice. # Purpose To survey and document the knowledge, clinical application methods, and use of mechanical percussion devices among healthcare professionals in the United States. # Design Cross-sectional survey study. # Methods A 25 question online survey was emailed to members of the National Athletic Trainers Association, Academy of Orthopedic Physical Therapy, and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy. # Results Four hundred twenty-five professionals completed the survey. Most professionals (92%, n=391) used devices from two manufacturers: Hyperice® and Theragun®. Seventy-seven percent directed clients to manufacturer and generic websites (n=329) to purchase devices. Most respondents used a medium and low device speed setting for pre- and post-exercise (62%, n=185), pain modulation (59%, n=253), and myofascial mobility (52%, n=222). A large proportion of respondents preferred a total treatment time between 30 seconds and three minutes (36-48%, n=153-204) or three to five minutes (18-22%, n=76-93). Most respondents (54-69%, n=229-293) believed that mechanical percussion increases local blood flow, modulates pain, enhances myofascial mobility, and reduces myofascial restrictions. Most respondents (72%, n=305) were influenced by other colleagues to use these devices. Sixty-six percent used patient reported outcomes (n=280) to document treatment efficacy. Live instruction was the most common mode of education (79%, n=334). # Conclusion These results are a starting point for future research and provide insight into how professionals use mechanical percussion devices. This survey also highlights the existing gap between research and practice. Future research should examine the efficacy of this technology and determine consensus-based guidelines. # Level of Evidence

A new look at the attribution model: Considerations for the measurement of public mental illness stigma.

Multiple versions of the Attribution Model and the corresponding Attribution Questionnaire have been used to assess public mental illness stigma. The objective of the current study was to examine (a) the factor structure of the Attribution Questionnaire and (b) relationships between constructs in the Attribution Model. Analyzing a sample of 334 U.S. adults recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk, the authors employ confirmatory factor analyses to test three proposed factor structures of the Attribution Questionnaire and latent variable path analyses to reexamine relationships between variables in the stigmatization of people who experience mental illness. Confirmatory factor analyses of three previously examined versions of the Attribution Model revealed that the model proposed by the initial version of the Attribution Questionnaire had the best fit with the data comparative fit index (CFI = 0.92, root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07, standardized root-mean-square residual [SRMR] = 0.05). Subsequent path analyses among contructs in the model revealed acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.06) and individual paths largely supported the hypotheses suggested by the Attribution Model. Analyses supported the original version of the Attribution Model and questionnaire with slight modifications, demonstrating that attributions of dangerousness and personal responsibility are associated with the endorsement of coercive treatment, and that attributions about dangerousness are associated with a lower desire to help. These findings suggest modifications in the current measurement of public mental illness stigma

Factors Associated with Revision Surgery after Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures

Background: Femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of revision surgery after management with internal fixation. Using data from the Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures (FAITH) trial evaluating methods of internal fixation in patients with femoral neck fractures, we investigated associations between baseline and surgical factors and the need for revision surgery to promote healing, relieve pain, treat infection or improve function over 24 months postsurgery. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with (1) hardware removal and (2) implant exchange from cancellous screws (CS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) to total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or another internal fixation device. Methods: We identified 15 potential factors a priori that may be associated with revision surgery, 7 with hardware removal, and 14 with implant exchange. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses in our investigation. Results: Factors associated with increased risk of revision surgery included: female sex, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.50; P = 0.001], higher body mass index (fo

The Influence Of Hip Muscle Impairments On Squat Performance

The squat is a fundamental movement for weight lifting and sport performance. Beyond performance, both unilateral and bilateral squats are used to assess dynamic lower extremity control, and they may be of value for assessing injury risk and functional independence. The purpose of this column is to present an evidence-based discussion of the influence that hip muscle impairments may have on unilateral and bilateral squat performance. Specifically, the effects of hip muscle pain, fatigue, and tightness are presented. Practical applications are discussed within the context of recognizing changes attributed to muscle impairments and guiding safe exercise prescription

A new look at the attribution model: Considerations for the measurement of public mental illness stigma.

Multiple versions of the Attribution Model and the corresponding Attribution Questionnaire have been used to assess public mental illness stigma. The objective of the current study was to examine (a) the factor structure of the Attribution Questionnaire and (b) relationships between constructs in the Attribution Model. Analyzing a sample of 334 U.S. adults recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk, the authors employ confirmatory factor analyses to test three proposed factor structures of the Attribution Questionnaire and latent variable path analyses to reexamine relationships between variables in the stigmatization of people who experience mental illness. Confirmatory factor analyses of three previously examined versions of the Attribution Model revealed that the model proposed by the initial version of the Attribution Questionnaire had the best fit with the data comparative fit index (CFI = 0.92, root-mean-square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07, standardized root-mean-square residual [SRMR] = 0.05). Subsequent path analyses among contructs in the model revealed acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.06) and individual paths largely supported the hypotheses suggested by the Attribution Model. Analyses supported the original version of the Attribution Model and questionnaire with slight modifications, demonstrating that attributions of dangerousness and personal responsibility are associated with the endorsement of coercive treatment, and that attributions about dangerousness are associated with a lower desire to help. These findings suggest modifications in the current measurement of public mental illness stigma