Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2

AbstractObjectives: This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor prescribing patterns.Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated a significant mortality benefit in patients treated with ACE inhibitors after AMI. Numerous studies have demonstrated underuse of other beneficial treatments for patients with AMI, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aspirin and immediate reperfusion therapy.Methods: Demographic, procedural and discharge medication data from 190,015 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 U.S. hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.Results: Prescriptions for ACE inhibitor therapy at hospital discharge increased from 25.0% in 1994 to 30.7% in 1996. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% or evidence of congestive heart failure while in the hospital were discharged with ACE inhibitor treatment 42.6% of the time. Of patients experiencing an anterior wall myocardial infarction and no evidence of heart failure, 26.1% of patients were discharged with this treatment. Of the remaining patients, 15.6% received ACE inhibitors at discharge. ACE inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly and diabetic patients as well as those requiring intraaortic balloon pump placement. This therapy was given less often to patients who underwent revascularization with coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery or were treated with calcium channel blocking agents.Conclusions: Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction with increasing frequency. Those patients with the greatest expected benefit receive ACE inhibitor treatment most often. However, the majority of even these high risk patients were not discharged with this life-saving therapy

Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patients with non–ST elevation acute myocardial infarction

AbstractOBJECTIVESTo compare short- and long-term outcome after early invasive or conservative strategies in the treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI).BACKGROUNDIt is uncertain whether or not there is benefit from emergent invasive diagnosis and treatment of AMI in patients without ST segment elevation on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG).METHODSIn a cohort of 1,635 consecutive patients with AMI who presented to hospitals without ST segment elevation on their admission ECG, we compared treatments, hospital course and outcome in 308 patients who presented to hospitals whose initial strategy favored early angiography and appropriate intervention when indicated versus 1,327 similar patients who presented to hospitals that favor a more conservative initial approach.RESULTSAt baseline, patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy were younger, more predominately Caucasian and had less comorbidity. Early coronary angiography occurred in 58.8% versus 8% (p < 0.001), and early angioplasty was performed in 44.8% versus 6.1% (p < 0.001) in the two different cohorts. Patients treated in hospitals favoring the early invasive strategy had a lower 30-day (5.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.026) and four-year mortality (20% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a trend towards lower hospital mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.09) and a significant lower long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.80) in patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy.CONCLUSIONSThese data suggested that an early invasive strategy in patients with AMI and nondiagnostic ECG changes is associated with lower long-term mortality

Enzyme estimates of infarct size correlate with functional and clinical outcomes in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundCardiac biomarkers are routinely obtained in the setting of suspected myocardial ischemia and infarction. Evidence suggests these markers may correlate with functional and clinical outcomes, but the strength of this correlation is unclear. The relationship between enzyme measures of myocardial necrosis and left ventricular performance and adverse clinical outcomes were explored.MethodsCreatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB data were analyzed, as were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by angiogram, and infarct size by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in patients in 2 trials: Prompt Reperfusion In Myocardial-infarction Evolution (PRIME), and Efegatran and Streptokinase to Canalize Arteries Like Accelerated Tissue plasminogen activator (ESCALAT). Both trials evaluated efegatran combined with thrombolysis for treating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).ResultsPeak CK and CK area-under-the-curve (AUC) correlated significantly with SPECT-determined infarct size 5 to 10 days after enrollment. Peak CK had a statistically significant correlation with LVEF, but CK-AUC and LVEF correlation were less robust. Statistically significant correlations exist between SPECT-determined infarct size and peak CK-MB and CK-MB AUC. However, there was no correlation with LVEF for peak CK-MB and CK-MB AUC. The combined outcome of congestive heart failure and death were significantly associated with CK AUC, CK-MB AUC, peak CK, and peak CK-MB measurements.ConclusionPeak CK and CK-MB values and AUC calculations have significant correlation with functional outcomes (LVEF- and SPECT-determined infarct size) and death or CHF outcomes in the setting of STEMI. Cardiac biomarkers provide prognostic information and may serve as valid endpoint measurements for phase II clinical trials

The association between clinical integration of care and transfer of veterans with acute coronary syndromes from primary care VHA hospitals

BACKGROUND: Few studies report on the effect of organizational factors facilitating transfer between primary and tertiary care hospitals either within an integrated health care system or outside it. In this paper, we report on the relationship between degree of clinical integration of cardiology services and transfer rates of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients from primary to tertiary hospitals within and outside the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Transfer rates were obtained for all patients with ACS diagnoses admitted to 12 primary VHA hospitals between 1998 and 1999. Binary variables measuring clinical integration were constructed for each primary VHA hospital reflecting: presence of on-site VHA cardiologist; referral coordinator at the associated tertiary VHA hospital; and/or referral coordinator at the primary VHA hospital. We assessed the association between the integration variables and overall transfer from primary to tertiary hospitals, using random effects logistic regression, controlling for clustering at two levels and adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Three of twelve hospitals had a VHA cardiologist on site, six had a referral coordinator at the tertiary VHA hospital, and four had a referral coordinator at the primary hospital. Presence of a VHA staff cardiologist on site and a referral coordinator at the tertiary VHA hospital decreased the likelihood of any transfer (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27–0.77, and 0.46, p = 0.002, CI 0.27–0.78). Conversely, having a referral coordinator at the primary VHA hospital increased the likelihood of transfer (OR 6.28, CI 2.92–13.48). CONCLUSIONS: Elements of clinical integration are associated with transfer, an important process in the care of ACS patients. In promoting optimal patient care, clinical integration factors should be considered in addition to patient characteristics

2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease

The recommendations listed in this document are, whenever possible, evidence based. An extensive evidence review was conducted as the document was compiled through December 2008. Repeated literature searches were performed by the guideline development staff and writing committee members as new issues were considered. New clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals and articles through December 2011 were also reviewed and incorporated when relevant. Furthermore, because of the extended development time period for this guideline, peer review comments indicated that the sections focused on imaging technologies required additional updating, which occurred during 2011. Therefore, the evidence review for the imaging sections includes published literature through December 2011

Influence of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent outcome of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest

AbstractThe effect of coronary bypass surgery on recurrent cardiac arrest was estimated in 265 patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest between 1970 and 1988. From this cohort, 85 patients (32%) underwent coronary bypass surgery after recovery from cardiac arrest and 180 patients (68%) were treated medically. A multivariate Cox analysis was used to estimate the effect of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent survival after adjusting for effects of age, prior cardiac history, ejection fraction, year of the event, history of angina, antiarrhythmic drug use and whether the arrest was related to acute myocardial infarction.The use of coronary bypass surgery had a significant effect in reducing the incidence of subsequent cardiac arrest daring follow-up study (risk ratio [RR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.97, p < 0.04). There was also a trend consistent with a reduction in total cardiac mortality (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.10, p = 0.10). These findings suggest that coronary bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of sudden death in suitable patients resuscitated from an episode of ventricular fibrillation