Objects of expansion of Byzantina Empire to the East (10th - 11th centuries). Terminology

This article deals with the development of main terms referring to spatial and administrative objects of expansion of the Byzantine Empire to the East. In the “Caucasian Dossier” by Constantine Porphyrogennetos most often occur the terms chora and chorion. In everyday speech these terms were synonymous but the authors of the “Caucasian Dossier” diff erentiate them (at least, with regard to the size). An analysis of verbal elements in this material is made more diffi cult by the fact that the Armenian-Chalcedonite nobility habitually used the phrase ašxarh hayoċ to refer to land possessions of Armenian rulers that came to be in the sphere of infl uence of the Empire, and in their reports to the Byzantine court used the lexeme chora as an equivalent to ašxarh. The “land” of the Taronites, the “land” of the Iberian Bagratids is a common possession of noble families, and the eff orts of Byzantine emperors to get a hold on lands of a certain aristocrat usually faced active resistance of his family. Agreements of this period with the Taronites and the Iberian Bagratids demonstrate initial stages in the process of transition from allies’ relationship to that of vassals

Subjects of expansion of Byzantine Empire to the East (10th–11th centuries). Terminology

This article deals with the terminology of those subjects of expansion of the Byzantine Empire to Asia Minor that emerged at the beginning of the movement of the Empire to the East and accompanied this process in the 10th–11th centuries. The emergence of new terms (Greek κλεισουράρχης, τοπάρχης), transformation of old (τοποτηρητής), as well as their situation-related manifold content responded to the conditions of genesis and functioning of the interspace between diff erent worlds of civilisation, i.e. the contact zone, where the mainstream socio-administrative and cultural processes were determined by the synthesis of Byzantine and Armenian institutions. Kleisourarches, toparches and topoteretes are the terms that appear to accompany the stages in the movement and the establishment of the Byzantine Empire in Armenian lands. Kleisourarches belongs to the fi rst stage of the conquest and disappears in the latter half of the 10th century. Toparches marks the genesis and functioning of contact zones in Armenia and the Balkans in the 11th century. By the 11th century, topoteretes loses its historical connection with the military system of themata and comes to be a synonym to toparches. Byzantine sources of the 10th–11th centuries, particularly the texts of Constantine Porphyrogennetos and Kekaumenos, provide the scholar with unique data that allow him to observe and analyse the living interconnection of civilisational types and those mechanisms that have formed the new social model as the result of the meeting and deep contact of the two civilisations