Correspondence - Extended Library Hours

Correspondence regarding increasing library weekend hours. Includes a reports entitled Cost Estimate in Response to ASG Resolution 89-4-F outlining costs of guards, students, and library staff; Friday & Saturday Evenings Turnstile Count for the period October 27 to November 12; Finals Week Patrons Between 5:00 - 10:00 PM for the 1988-89 school year; Circulation Weekend Statistics for the period October 27 to November 12, 1989; and Reference Weekend Statistics for the period October 27 to November 12, 1989

Correspondence - Resolution 90-6-S

Memoranda from Amos Gott to Lee Murray, Jerry Wilder, Howard Bailey, Scott Taylor, Robert Haynes and Ronnie Sutton regarding changes in the final exam schedule

Correspondence - Resolution 90-1-S

Memo from Amos Gott to Scott Taylor, Jerry Wilder and Howard Bailey regarding the creation of a freshman orientation program

Correspondence - Resolution 89-12-F

Memorandum from Amos Gott to Freida Eggleton, Jerry Wilder, Howard Bailey and Scott Taylor requesting larger format diplomas

Correspondence - Resolution 89-6-F

Correspondence regarding creation of a food services committee

Correspondence - Resolution 89-10-F

Correspondence regarding selling mace at the University Bookstore. Includes a pamphlet entitled The Instantly Effective Non-Lethal Self Defense Weapon

Correspondence - Resolution 89-3-F

Correspondence regarding Resolution 89-3-F requesting AIDS, HIV and sexually transmitted disease education

She Embodied: A Materialized Collective

This collaboratively written piece materializes the collective experiences of 14 students and an instructor in a graduate-level feminist research methods class in the United States. Instead of writing a traditional seminar paper, the class decided to continue our weekly discussions, during which we wrestled with both theory and practice, in text in a final paper. It just seemed like the best way to end our time together. In so doing, the she embodied collective furthers feminist writing practices that embrace uneasy collectives of varying viewpoints. This particular collective acknowledges our she, but recognizes, listens to, and celebrates all the powerful pronouns that create a collective. The collective offers a brief introduction and lengthy appendix to situate the piece. We do not adhere to a singular feminism in the piece. Consequently, our collective is a way of doing unity differently, of attending to and residing with the frictional thought within feminisms and finding that frictional thought as generative. We invite readers to join our collective, to think together across differences without reducing those differences to similarities