5 research outputs found

    Fam60A plays a role for production stabilities of recombinant CHO cell lines

    No full text
    Recombinant CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cell lines producing therapeutic proteins often lose their production capability during long-term cultivation. To ensure that CHO production cell lines can be up-scaled to high volume bioreactors labor intensive stability studies of several months have to be performed to deselect clones that are losing productivity over time. The ability to predict whether clones will produce recombinant proteins at constant high levels e.g. through determination of biomarkers such as expression of specific genes, plasmid integration sites or epigenetic patterns, or even to improve CHO host cell lines to increase the probability of the generation of stable clones would be highly beneficial. Previously, we reported that the lack of a telomeric region of chromosome 8 correlates with increased productivities and higher production stabilities of monoclonal antibody expressing CHO cell lines (Ritter et al. 2015). Herein, we describe that the knock-out of the gene Fam60A, which is one of the genes located within the telomeric region of chromosome 8, in CHO-K1a cells leads to the isolation of significantly more clones with higher protein production stabilities of monoclonal antibodies during long-term cultivation

    The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    No full text

    The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Get PDF
    The PREDICTS project—Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems (www.predicts.org.uk)—has collated from published studies a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use. We have used this evidence base to develop global and regional statistical models of how local biodiversity responds to these measures. We describe and make freely available this 2016 release of the database, containing more than 3.2 million records sampled at over 26,000 locations and representing over 47,000 species. We outline how the database can help in answering a range of questions in ecology and conservation biology. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically and taxonomically representative database of spatial comparisons of biodiversity that has been collated to date; it will be useful to researchers and international efforts wishing to model and understand the global status of biodiversity
    corecore