10 research outputs found

    Identification of the genetic determinants of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium that may regulate the expression of the type 1 fimbriae in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Type 1 fimbriae are the most commonly found fimbrial appendages on the outer membrane of <it>Salmonella enterica </it>serotype Typhimurium. Previous investigations indicate that static broth culture favours <it>S</it>. Typhimurium to produce type 1 fimbriae, while non-fimbriate bacteria are obtained by growth on solid agar media. The phenotypic expression of type 1 fimbriae in <it>S</it>. Typhimurium is the result of the interaction and cooperation of several genes in the <it>fim </it>gene cluster. Other gene products that may also participate in the regulation of type 1 fimbrial expression remain uncharacterized.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the present study, transposon insertion mutagenesis was performed on <it>S</it>. Typhimurium to generate a library to screen for those mutants that would exhibit different type 1 fimbrial phenotypes than the parental strain. Eight-two mutants were obtained from 7,239 clones screened using the yeast agglutination test. Forty-four mutants produced type 1 fimbriae on both solid agar and static broth media, while none of the other 38 mutants formed type 1 fimbriae in either culture condition. The flanking sequences of the transposons from 54 mutants were cloned and sequenced. These mutants can be classified according to the functions or putative functions of the open reading frames disrupted by the transposon. Our current results indicate that the genetic determinants such as those involved in the fimbrial biogenesis and regulation, global regulators, transporter proteins, prophage-derived proteins, and enzymes of different functions, to name a few, may play a role in the regulation of type 1 fimbrial expression in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions. A complementation test revealed that transforming a recombinant plasmid possessing the coding sequence of a NAD(P)H-flavin reductase gene <it>ubiB </it>restored an <it>ubiB </it>mutant to exhibit the type 1 fimbrial phenotype as its parental strain.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Genetic determinants other than the <it>fim </it>genes may involve in the regulation of type 1 fimbrial expression in <it>S</it>. Typhimurium. How each gene product may influence type 1 fimbrial expression is an interesting research topic which warrants further investigation.</p

    Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

    No full text
    Funder: NCI U24CA211006Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts

    Identification of the genetic determinants of serotype Typhimurium that may regulate the expression of the type 1 fimbriae in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions-2

    No full text
    Densitometry and expressed (Arabic numbers) relative to the value for transcription obtained from the static LB broth culture condition. The intensities of 16S rRNA shown indicates that equivalent amounts of total RNA were used in the experiment.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Identification of the genetic determinants of serotype Typhimurium that may regulate the expression of the type 1 fimbriae in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/8/126</p><p>BMC Microbiology 2008;8():126-126.</p><p>Published online 25 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2527010.</p><p></p

    Identification of the genetic determinants of serotype Typhimurium that may regulate the expression of the type 1 fimbriae in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions-1

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Identification of the genetic determinants of serotype Typhimurium that may regulate the expression of the type 1 fimbriae in response to solid agar and static broth culture conditions"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/8/126</p><p>BMC Microbiology 2008;8():126-126.</p><p>Published online 25 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2527010.</p><p></p

    Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

    Get PDF
    The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts.The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that -80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAFPeer reviewe

    Luminescent perovskites: recent advances in theory and experiments

    No full text

    Advanced Sorbents for Oil-Spill Cleanup: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

    No full text

    Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

    No full text
    The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts
    corecore