Bio-inspired computation: where we stand and what's next

In recent years, the research community has witnessed an explosion of literature dealing with the adaptation of behavioral patterns and social phenomena observed in nature towards efficiently solving complex computational tasks. This trend has been especially dramatic in what relates to optimization problems, mainly due to the unprecedented complexity of problem instances, arising from a diverse spectrum of domains such as transportation, logistics, energy, climate, social networks, health and industry 4.0, among many others. Notwithstanding this upsurge of activity, research in this vibrant topic should be steered towards certain areas that, despite their eventual value and impact on the field of bio-inspired computation, still remain insufficiently explored to date. The main purpose of this paper is to outline the state of the art and to identify open challenges concerning the most relevant areas within bio-inspired optimization. An analysis and discussion are also carried out over the general trajectory followed in recent years by the community working in this field, thereby highlighting the need for reaching a consensus and joining forces towards achieving valuable insights into the understanding of this family of optimization techniques

Bio-inspired computation: where we stand and what's next

In recent years, the research community has witnessed an explosion of literature dealing with the adaptation of behavioral patterns and social phenomena observed in nature towards efficiently solving complex computational tasks. This trend has been especially dramatic in what relates to optimization problems, mainly due to the unprecedented complexity of problem instances, arising from a diverse spectrum of domains such as transportation, logistics, energy, climate, social networks, health and industry 4.0, among many others. Notwithstanding this upsurge of activity, research in this vibrant topic should be steered towards certain areas that, despite their eventual value and impact on the field of bio-inspired computation, still remain insufficiently explored to date. The main purpose of this paper is to outline the state of the art and to identify open challenges concerning the most relevant areas within bio-inspired optimization. An analysis and discussion are also carried out over the general trajectory followed in recent years by the community working in this field, thereby highlighting the need for reaching a consensus and joining forces towards achieving valuable insights into the understanding of this family of optimization techniques

A Comprehensive Review of Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithms Including Applications in Microelectronics and Nanophotonics

The application of artificial intelligence in everyday life is becoming all-pervasive and unavoidable. Within that vast field, a special place belongs to biomimetic/bio-inspired algorithms for multiparameter optimization, which find their use in a large number of areas. Novel methods and advances are being published at an accelerated pace. Because of that, in spite of the fact that there are a lot of surveys and reviews in the field, they quickly become dated. Thus, it is of importance to keep pace with the current developments. In this review, we first consider a possible classification of bio-inspired multiparameter optimization methods because papers dedicated to that area are relatively scarce and often contradictory. We proceed by describing in some detail some more prominent approaches, as well as those most recently published. Finally, we consider the use of biomimetic algorithms in two related wide fields, namely microelectronics (including circuit design optimization) and nanophotonics (including inverse design of structures such as photonic crystals, nanoplasmonic configurations and metamaterials). We attempted to keep this broad survey self-contained so it can be of use not only to scholars in the related fields, but also to all those interested in the latest developments in this attractive area

Novel Evolutionary-based Methods for the Robust Training of SVR and GMDH Regressors

En los últimos años se han consolidado una serie de diferentes métodos y algoritmos para problemas de aprendizaje máquina y optimización de sistemas, que han dado lugar a toda una corriente de investigación conocida como Soft-Computing. El término de Soft-Computing hace referencia a una colección de técnicas computacionales que intenta estudiar, modelar y analizar fenómenos muy complejos, para los que los métodos convencionales no proporcionan soluciones completas, o no las proporcionan en un tiempo razonable. Dentro de lo que se considera como Soft-Computing existen una gran cantidad de técnicas tales como Redes Neuronales, Máquinas de Vectores Soporte (SVM), Redes Bayesianas, Computación Evolutiva (Algoritmos Genéticos, Algoritmos Evolutivos etc), etc. La investigación de la Tesis está enfocada en dos de estas técnicas, en primer lugar las máquinas de vectores soporte de regresión (SVR) y en segundo lugar a las GMDH (Group Method of Data Handling). Las SVM son una técnica ideada por Vapnik, basada en el principio de minimización del riesgo estructural y la teoría de los métodos kernel, que a partir de un conjunto de datos construye una regla de decisión con la cual intentar predecir nuevos valores para dicho proceso a partir de nuevas entradas. La eficiencia de los sistemas SVM ha hecho que tengan un desarrollo muy significativo en los últimos años y se hayan utilizado en una gran cantidad de aplicaciones tanto para clasificación como para problemas de regresión (SVR). Uno de los principales problemas es la búsqueda de los que se conoce como hiper-parámetros. Estos parámetros no pueden ser calculados de forma exacta, por lo que se hace necesario testear un gran número de combinaciones, para obtener unos parámetros que generen una buena función de estimación. Debido a esto el tiempo de entrenamiento suele ser elevado y no siempre los parámetros encontrados generan una buena solución: ya sea porque el algoritmo de búsqueda tenga un pobre rendimiento o porque el modelo generado está sobre-entrenado. En esta Tesis se ha desarrollado un nuevo algoritmo de tipo evolutivo para el entrenamiento con kernel multi-paramétrico. Este nuevo algoritmo tiene en cuenta un parámetro distinto, para cada una de las dimensiones del espacio de entradas. En este caso, debido al incremento del número de parámetros no puede utilizarse una búsqueda en grid clásica, debido al coste computacional que conllevaría. Por ello, en esta Tesis se propone la utilización de un algoritmo evolutivo para la obtención de los valores óptimos de los parámetros de la SVR y la aplicación de nuevas cotas para los parámetros de este kernel multi-paramétrico. Junto con esto, se han desarrollado nuevos métodos de validación que mejoren el rendimiento de las técnicas de regresión en problemas data-driven. La idea es obtener mejores modelos en la fase de entrenamiento del algoritmo, de tal forma que el desempeño con el conjunto de test mejore, principalmente en lo que a tiempo de entrenamiento se refiere y en el rendimiento general del sistema, con respecto a otros métodos de validación clásicos como son K-Fold cross-validation, etc. El otro foco de investigación de esta Tesis se encuentra en la técnica GMDH, ideada en los años 70 por Ivakhnenko. Es un método particularmente útil para problemas que requieran bajos tiempos de entrenamiento. Es un algoritmo auto-organizado, donde el modelo se genera de forma adaptativa a partir de los datos, creciendo con el tiempo en complejidad y ajustándose al problema en cuestión, hasta que el modelo alcanza un grado de complejidad óptima, es decir, no es demasiado simple ni demasiado complejo. De esta forma el algoritmo construye el modelo en base a los datos de los que dispone y no a una idea preconcebida del investigador, como ocurre en la mayoría de las técnicas de Soft-Computing. Las GMDH también tienen algunos inconvenientes como son los errores debido al sobre-entrenamiento y la multicolinealidad, esto hace que en algunas ocasiones el error sea elevado si lo comparamos con otras técnicas. Esta Tesis propone un nuevo algoritmo de construcción de estas redes basado en un algoritmo de tipo hiper-heurístico. Esta aproximación es un concepto nuevo relacionado con la computación evolutiva, que codifica varios heurísticos que pueden ser utilizados de forma secuencial para resolver un problema de optimización. En nuestro caso particular, varios heurísticos básicos se codifican en un algoritmo evolutivo, para crear una solución hiper-heurística que permita construir redes GMDH robustas en problemas de regresión. Todas las propuestas y métodos desarrollados en esta Tesis han sido evaluados experimentalmente en problemas benchmark, así como en aplicaciones de regresión reales

From Parameter Tuning to Dynamic Heuristic Selection

The importance of balance between exploration and exploitation plays a crucial role while solving combinatorial optimization problems. This balance is reached by two general techniques: by using an appropriate problem solver and by setting its proper parameters. Both problems were widely studied in the past and the research process continues up until now. The latest studies in the field of automated machine learning propose merging both problems, solving them at design time, and later strengthening the results at runtime. To the best of our knowledge, the generalized approach for solving the parameter setting problem in heuristic solvers has not yet been proposed. Therefore, the concept of merging heuristic selection and parameter control have not been introduced. In this thesis, we propose an approach for generic parameter control in meta-heuristics by means of reinforcement learning (RL). Making a step further, we suggest a technique for merging the heuristic selection and parameter control problems and solving them at runtime using RL-based hyper-heuristic. The evaluation of the proposed parameter control technique on a symmetric traveling salesman problem (TSP) revealed its applicability by reaching the performance of tuned in online and used in isolation underlying meta-heuristic. Our approach provides the results on par with the best underlying heuristics with tuned parameters.:1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Research objective 2 1.3 Solution overview 2 2 Background and RelatedWork Analysis 3 2.1 Optimization Problems and their Solvers 3 2.2 Heuristic Solvers for Optimization Problems 9 2.3 Setting Algorithm Parameters 19 2.4 Combined Algorithm Selection and Hyper-Parameter Tuning Problem 27 2.5 Conclusion on Background and Related Work Analysis 28 3 Online Selection Hyper-Heuristic with Generic Parameter Control 31 3.1 Combined Parameter Control and Algorithm Selection Problem 31 3.2 Search Space Structure 32 3.3 Parameter Prediction Process 34 3.4 Low-Level Heuristics 35 3.5 Conclusion of Concept 36 4 Implementation Details 37 4.2 Search Space 40 4.3 Prediction Process 43 4.4 Low Level Heuristics 48 4.5 Conclusion 52 5 Evaluation 55 5.1 Optimization Problem 55 5.2 Environment Setup 56 5.3 Meta-heuristics Tuning 56 5.4 Concept Evaluation 60 5.5 Analysis of HH-PC Settings 74 5.6 Conclusion 79 6 Conclusion 81 7 FutureWork 83 7.1 Prediction Process 83 7.2 Search Space 84 7.3 Evaluations and Benchmarks 84 Bibliography 87 A Evaluation Results 99 A.1 Results in Figures 99 A.2 Results in numbers 10

A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching

Selecting the most appropriate heuristic for solving a specific problem is not easy, for many reasons. This article focuses on one of these reasons: traditionally, the solution search process has operated in a given manner regardless of the specific problem being solved, and the process has been the same regardless of the size, complexity and domain of the problem. To cope with this situation, search processes should mould the search into areas of the search space that are meaningful for the problem. This article builds on previous work in the development of a multi-agent paradigm using techniques derived from knowledge discovery (data-mining techniques) on databases of so-far visited solutions. The aim is to improve the search mechanisms, increase computational efficiency and use rules to enrich the formulation of optimization problems, while reducing the search space and catering to realistic problems.Izquierdo Sebastián, J.; Montalvo Arango, I.; Campbell, E.; Pérez García, R. (2015). A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching. Engineering Optimization. 1-13. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2015.1107434S113Becker, U., & Fahrmeir, L. (2001). Bump Hunting for Risk: a New Data Mining Tool and its Applications. Computational Statistics, 16(3), 373-386. doi:10.1007/s001800100073Bouguessa, M., & Shengrui Wang. (2009). Mining Projected Clusters in High-Dimensional Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 507-522. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.162Chong, I.-G., & Jun, C.-H. (2005). Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 78(1-2), 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.011CHONG, I., & JUN, C. (2008). Flexible patient rule induction method for optimizing process variables in discrete type. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 3014-3020. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.047Cole, S. W., Galic, Z., & Zack, J. A. (2003). Controlling false-negative errors in microarray differential expression analysis: a PRIM approach. Bioinformatics, 19(14), 1808-1816. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg242FRIEDMAN, J. H., & FISHER, N. I. (1999). Statistics and Computing, 9(2), 123-143. doi:10.1023/a:1008894516817Geem, Z. W. (2006). Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization, 38(3), 259-277. doi:10.1080/03052150500467430Goncalves, L. B., Vellasco, M. M. B. R., Pacheco, M. A. C., & Flavio Joaquim de Souza. (2006). Inverted hierarchical neuro-fuzzy BSP system: a novel neuro-fuzzy model for pattern classification and rule extraction in databases. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36(2), 236-248. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2004.843220Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5Chih-Ming Hsu, & Ming-Syan Chen. (2009). On the Design and Applicability of Distance Functions in High-Dimensional Data Space. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 523-536. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.178Hwang, S.-F., & He, R.-S. (2006). A hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm for function optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(1), 7-21. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.09.001Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Pérez, R., & Fuertes, V. S. (2008). Design optimization of wastewater collection networks by PSO. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 777-784. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.007Javadi, A. A., Farmani, R., & Tan, T. P. (2005). A hybrid intelligent genetic algorithm. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(4), 255-262. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.07.003Jin, X., Zhang, J., Gao, J., & Wu, W. (2008). Multi-objective optimization of water supply network rehabilitation with non-dominated sorting Genetic Algorithm-II. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 9(3), 391-400. doi:10.1631/jzus.a071448Johns, M. B., Keedwell, E., & Savic, D. (2014). Adaptive locally constrained genetic algorithm for least-cost water distribution network design. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 288-301. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.218Jourdan, L., Corne, D., Savic, D., & Walters, G. (2005). Preliminary Investigation of the ‘Learnable Evolution Model’ for Faster/Better Multiobjective Water Systems Design. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 841-855. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_58Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S. R., & Joos, G. (2009). Development of Rule-Based Classifiers for Rapid Stability Assessment of Wide-Area Post-Disturbance Records. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(1), 258-270. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2009430Kang, D., & Lansey, K. (2012). Revisiting Optimal Water-Distribution System Design: Issues and a Heuristic Hierarchical Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(3), 208-217. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000165Keedwell, E., & Khu, S.-T. (2005). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the design of water distribution networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18(4), 461-472. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2004.10.001Kehl, V., & Ulm, K. (2006). Responder identification in clinical trials with censored data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(5), 1338-1355. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.015Liu, X., Minin, V., Huang, Y., Seligson, D. B., & Horvath, S. (2004). Statistical Methods for Analyzing Tissue Microarray Data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 14(3), 671-685. doi:10.1081/bip-200025657Marchi, A., Dandy, G., Wilkins, A., & Rohrlach, H. (2014). Methodology for Comparing Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization of Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(1), 22-31. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000321Martínez-Rodríguez, J. B., Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Reliability and Tolerance Comparison in Water Supply Networks. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1437-1448. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9753-2McClymont, K., Keedwell, E., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2013). A general multi-objective hyper-heuristic for water distribution network design with discolouration risk. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15(3), 700-716. doi:10.2166/hydro.2012.022McClymont, K., Keedwell, E. C., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2014). Automated construction of evolutionary algorithm operators for the bi-objective water distribution network design problem using a genetic programming based hyper-heuristic approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 302-318. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.226Michalski, R. S. (2000). Machine Learning, 38(1/2), 9-40. doi:10.1023/a:1007677805582Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Herrera, M. (2014). Water Distribution System Computer-Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(6), 433-448. doi:10.1111/mice.12062Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Schwarze, S., & Pérez-García, R. (2010). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization applied to water distribution systems design: An approach with human interaction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7-8), 1219-1227. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.017Nguyen, V. V., Hartmann, D., & König, M. (2012). A distributed agent-based approach for simulation-based optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(4), 814-832. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.06.001Nicklow, J., Reed, P., Savic, D., Dessalegne, T., Harrell, L., … Chan-Hilton, A. (2010). State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136(4), 412-432. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000053Onwubolu, G. C., & Babu, B. V. (2004). New Optimization Techniques in Engineering. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39930-8Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D. E., & Lobo, F. G. (2002). Computational Optimization and Applications, 21(1), 5-20. doi:10.1023/a:1013500812258Reed, P. M., Hadka, D., Herman, J. D., Kasprzyk, J. R., & Kollat, J. B. (2013). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 438-456. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005Shang, W., Zhao, S., & Shen, Y. (2009). A flexible tolerance genetic algorithm for optimal problems with nonlinear equality constraints. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(3), 253-264. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2008.09.001Vrugt, J. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2007). Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(3), 708-711. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610471104Vrugt, J. A., Robinson, B. A., & Hyman, J. M. (2009). Self-Adaptive Multimethod Search for Global Optimization in Real-Parameter Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(2), 243-259. doi:10.1109/tevc.2008.924428Xie, X.-F., & Liu, J. (2008). Graph coloring by multiagent fusion search. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 18(2), 99-123. doi:10.1007/s10878-008-9140-6Xiao-Feng Xie, & Jiming Liu. (2009). Multiagent Optimization System for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 39(2), 489-502. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2006910Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2013). A decomposition and multistage optimization approach applied to the optimization of water distribution systems with multiple supply sources. Water Resources Research, 49(1), 380-399. doi:10.1029/2012wr013160Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2014). Coupled Binary Linear Programming–Differential Evolution Algorithm Approach for Water Distribution System Optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(5), 585-597. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.000036

Effective Solution of University Course Timetabling using Particle Swarm Optimizer based Hyper Heuristic approach

عادة ما تكون مشكلة الجدول الزمني للمحاضرات الجامعية (UCTP) هي مشكلة تحسين الإندماجية. يستغرق الأمر جهود يدوية لعدة أيام للوصول إلى جدول زمني مفيد ، ولا تزال النتائج غير جيدة بما يكفي. تُستخدم طرق مختلفة من (الإرشاد أو الإرشاد المساعد) لحل UCTP بشكل مناسب. لكن هذه الأساليب عادةً ما تعطي حلول محدودة. يعالج إطار العمل الاسترشادي العالي هذه المشكلة المعقدة بشكل مناسب. يقترح هذا البحث استخدام محسن سرب الجسيمات استنادا على منهجية الإرشاد العالي (HH PSO) لمعالجة مشكلة الجدول الزمني للمحاضرات الجامعية (UCTP) . محسن سرب الجسيمات PSO يستخدام كطريقة ذات مستوى عالي لتحديد تسلسل الاستدلال ذي المستوى المنخفض (LLH) والذي من ناحية أخرى يستطيع توليد الحل الأمثل. لنهج المقترح يقسم الحل إلى مرحلتين (المرحلة الأولية ومرحلة التحسين). قمنا بتطوير LLH جديد يسمى "أقل عدد ممكن من الغرف المتبقية"  لجدولة الأحداث. يتم استخدام مجموعتي بيانات مسابقة الجدول الزمني الدولية (ITC)  ITC 2002 و ITC 2007 لتقييم الطريقة المقترحة. تشير النتائج الأولية  إلى أن الإرشاد منخفض المستوى المقترح يساعد في جدولة الأحداث في المرحلة الأولية. بالمقارنة مع LLH الأخرى ، الطريقة LLH المقترحة جدولت المزيد من الأحداث لـ 14 و 15 من حالات البيانات من 24 و 20 حالة بيانات من ITC 2002 و ITC 2007 ، على التوالي. تظهر الدراسة التجريبية أن HH PSO تحصل على معدل خرق أقل للقيود في سبع وستة حالات بيانات من ITC 2007 و ITC 2002 ، على التوالي. واستنتج هذا البحث أن LLH المقترحة يمكن أن تحصل على حل معقول وملائم إذا تم تحديد الأولوياتThe university course timetable problem (UCTP) is typically a combinatorial optimization problem. Manually achieving a useful timetable requires many days of effort, and the results are still unsatisfactory. unsatisfactory. Various states of art methods (heuristic, meta-heuristic) are used to satisfactorily solve UCTP. However, these approaches typically represent the instance-specific solutions. The hyper-heuristic framework adequately addresses this complex problem. This research proposed Particle Swarm Optimizer-based Hyper Heuristic (HH PSO) to solve UCTP efficiently. PSO is used as a higher-level method that selects low-level heuristics (LLH) sequence which further generates an optimal solution. The proposed approach generates solutions into two phases (initial and improvement). A new LLH named “least possible rooms left” has been developed and proposed to schedule events. Both datasets of international timetabling competition (ITC) i.e., ITC 2002 and ITC 2007 are used to evaluate the proposed method. Experimental results indicate that the proposed low-level heuristic helps to schedule events at the initial stage. When compared with other LLH’s, the proposed LLH schedule more events for 14 and 15 data instances out of 24 and 20 data instances of ITC 2002 and ITC 2007, respectively. The experimental study shows that HH PSO gets a lower soft constraint violation rate on seven and six data instances of ITC 2007 and ITC 2002, respectively. This research has concluded the proposed LLH can get a feasible solution if prioritized

State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods

Aerodynamic optimisation has become an indispensable component for any aerodynamic design over the past 60 years, with applications to aircraft, cars, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows, and cavities, among others, and is thus relevant in many facets of technology. With advancements in computational power, automated design optimisation procedures have become more competent, however, there is an ambiguity and bias throughout the literature with regards to relative performance of optimisation architectures and employed algorithms. This paper provides a well-balanced critical review of the dominant optimisation approaches that have been integrated with aerodynamic theory for the purpose of shape optimisation. A total of 229 papers, published in more than 120 journals and conference proceedings, have been classified into 6 different optimisation algorithm approaches. The material cited includes some of the most well-established authors and publications in the field of aerodynamic optimisation. This paper aims to eliminate bias toward certain algorithms by analysing the limitations, drawbacks, and the benefits of the most utilised optimisation approaches. This review provides comprehensive but straightforward insight for non-specialists and reference detailing the current state for specialist practitioners

Metaheuristic Optimization of Power and Energy Systems: Underlying Principles and Main Issues of the `Rush to Heuristics'

In the power and energy systems area, a progressive increase of literature contributions that contain applications of metaheuristic algorithms is occurring. In many cases, these applications are merely aimed at proposing the testing of an existing metaheuristic algorithm on a specific problem, claiming that the proposed method is better than other methods that are based on weak comparisons. This ‘rush to heuristics’ does not happen in the evolutionary computation domain, where the rules for setting up rigorous comparisons are stricter but are typical of the domains of application of the metaheuristics. This paper considers the applications to power and energy systems and aims at providing a comprehensive view of the main issues that concern the use of metaheuristics for global optimization problems. A set of underlying principles that characterize the metaheuristic algorithms is presented. The customization of metaheuristic algorithms to fit the constraints of specific problems is discussed. Some weaknesses and pitfalls that are found in literature contributions are identified, and specific guidelines are provided regarding how to prepare sound contributions on the application of metaheuristic algorithms to specific problems