Some Bi-Hamiltonian Equations in R3R^3

Hamiltonian formulation of N=3 systems is considered in general. The Jacobi equation is solved in three classes. Compatible Poisson structures in these classes are determined and explicitly given. The corresponding bi-Hamiltonian systems are constructed and some explicit examples are given.Comment: 25 page

Ensembles of wrappers for automated feature selection in fish age classification

In feature selection, the most important features must be chosen so as to decrease the number thereof while retaining their discriminatory information. Within this context, a novel feature selection method based on an ensemble of wrappers is proposed and applied for automatically select features in fish age classification. The effectiveness of this procedure using an Atlantic cod database has been tested for different powerful statistical learning classifiers. The subsets based on few features selected, e.g. otolith weight and fish weight, are particularly noticeable given current biological findings and practices in fishery research and the classification results obtained with them outperforms those of previous studies in which a manual feature selection was performed.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

A note on selecting maximals in finite spaces

Given a choice problem, the maximization rule may select many alternatives. In such cases, it is common practice to interpret that the final choice will end up being made by some random procedure, assigning to any maximal alternative the same probability of being chosen. However, there may be reasons based on the same original preferences for which it is suitable to select certain maximal alternatives over others. This paper introduces two choice criteria induced by the original preferences such that maximizing with respect to each of them may give a finer selection of alternatives than maximizing with respect to the original preferences. Those criteria are built by means of several preference relations induced by the original preferences, namely, two (weak) dominance relations, two indirect preference relations and the dominance relations defined with the help of those indirect preferences. It is remarkable that as the original preferences approach being complete and transitive, those criteria become both simpler and closer to such preferences. In particular, they coincide with the original preferences when these are complete and transitive, in which case they provide the same solution as those preference

A non-proposition-wise variant of majority voting for aggregating judgments

Majority voting is commonly used in aggregating judgments. The literature to date on judgment aggregation (JA) has focused primarily on proposition-wise majority voting (PMV). Given a set of issues on which a group is trying to make collective judgments, PMV aggregates individual judgments issue by issue, and satisfies a salient property of JA rules—independence. This paper introduces a variant of majority voting called holistic majority voting (HMV). This new variant also meets the condition of independence. However, instead of aggregating judgments issue by issue, it aggregates individual judgments en bloc. A salient and straightforward feature of HMV is that it guarantees the logical consistency of the propositions expressing collective judgments, provided that the individual points of view are consistent. This feature contrasts with the known inability of PMV to guarantee the consistency of the collective outcome. Analogously, while PMV may present a set of judgments that have been rejected by everyone in the group as collectively accepted, the collective judgments returned by HMV have been accepted by a majority of individuals in the group and, therefore, rejected by a minority of them at most. In addition, HMV satisfies a large set of appealing properties, as PMV also does. However, HMV may not return any complete proposition expressing the judgments of the group on all the issues at stake, even in cases where PMV does. Moreover, demanding completeness from HMV leads to impossibility results similar to the known impossibilities on PMV and on proposition-wise JA rules in genera

Complete intersections in simplicial toric varieties

Given a set $\mathcal A = \{a_1,\ldots,a_n\} \subset \mathbb{N}^m$ of nonzero vectors defining a simplicial toric ideal $I_{\mathcal A} \subset k[x_1,...,x_n]$, where $k$ is an arbitrary field, we provide an algorithm for checking whether $I_{\mathcal A}$ is a complete intersection. This algorithm does not require the explicit computation of a minimal set of generators of $I_{\mathcal A}$. The algorithm is based on the application of some new results concerning toric ideals to the simplicial case. For homogenous simplicial toric ideals, we provide a simpler version of this algorithm. Moreover, when $k$ is an algebraically closed field, we list all ideal-theoretic complete intersection simplicial projective toric varieties that are either smooth or have one singular point.Comment: 28 pages, 2 tables. To appear in Journal of Symbolic Computatio

Syzygies of differentials of forms

Given a standard graded polynomial ring $R=k[x_1,...,x_n]$ over a field $k$ of characteristic zero and a graded $k$-subalgebra $A=k[f_1,...,f_m]\subset R$, one relates the module $\Omega_{A/k}$ of K\"ahler $k$-differentials of $A$ to the transposed Jacobian module $\mathcal{D}\subset \sum_{i=1}^n R dx_i$ of the forms $f_1,...,f_m$ by means of a {\em Leibniz map} \Omega_{A/k}\rar \mathcal{D} whose kernel is the torsion of $\Omega_{A/k}$. Letting \fp denote the $R$-submodule generated by the (image of the) syzygy module of $\Omega_{A/k}$ and \fz the syzygy module of $\mathcal{D}$, there is a natural inclusion \fp\subset \fz coming from the chain rule for composite derivatives. The main goal is to give means to test when this inclusion is an equality -- in which case one says that the forms $f_1,...,f_m$ are {\em polarizable}. One surveys some classes of subalgebras that are generated by polarizable forms. The problem has some curious connections with constructs of commutative algebra, such as the Jacobian ideal, the conormal module and its torsion, homological dimension in $R$ and syzygies, complete intersections and Koszul algebras. Some of these connections trigger questions which have interest in their own.Comment: 20 pages. Minor changes after referee's report and updated bibliograph

A pooling approach to judgment aggregation

The literature has focused on a particular way of aggregating judgments: Given a set of yes or no questions or issues, the individuals’ judgments are then aggregated separately, issue by issue. Applied in this way, the majority method does not guarantee the logical consistency of the set of judgments obtained. This fact has been the focus of critiques of the majority method and similar procedures. This paper focuses on another way of aggregating judgments. The main difference is that aggregation is made en bloc on all the issues at stake. The main consequence is that the majority method applied in this way does always guarantee the logical consistency of the collective judgments. Since it satisfies a large set of attractive properties, it should provide the basis for more positive assessment if applied using the proposed pooling approach than if used separately. The paper extends the analysis to the pooling supermajority and plurality rules, with similar result