22 research outputs found
Linking habitat quality with genetic diversity: a lesson from great bustards in Spain
P. 411-419The effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on the genetic structure and variability of wild populations have received wide empirical support and theoretical formalization. By contrast, the effects of habitat quality seem largely underinvestigated, partly due to technical difficulties in properly assessing habitat quality. In this study, we combine geographic information system (GIS)-based habitat-quality modelling with a landscape genetics approach based on mitochondrial DNA markers to evaluate the possible influence of habitat quality on the levels and distribution of genetic diversity in a range of natural populations (nâ=â15) of Otis tarda throughout Spain. Ninety-three percent of the population represented by our countrywide sample lives in good-quality habitats, while 4.5% and 2.5% occur respectively in intermediate and poor habitats. Habitat quality was highly correlated with patch size, population size and population density, indicating the reliability and predictive power of the habitat suitability model. Genetic diversity was significantly correlated with habitat quality, size and density of the population, but not with patch size. Three of a total of 20 existing matrilineages from the speciesâ current genetic pool are restricted to poor-quality habitats. This study therefore highlights the importance of considering both population genetics and habitat quality in a species of high conservation priority.S
Thrombospondin-1 in Early Flow-Related Remodeling of Mesenteric Arteries from Young Normotensive and Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
We tested the hypotheses that TSP-1 participates in the initiation of remodeling of small muscular arteries in response to altered blood flow and that the N-terminal domain of TSP-1 (hepI) can reverse the pathological inward remodeling of resistance arteries from SHR
Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger
On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of ~1.7 s with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a luminosity distance of 40+8-8 Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 Mo. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at ~40 Mpc) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One- Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ~10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transientâs position ~9 and ~16 days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta
Supplement: "Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914" (2016, ApJL, 826, L13)
This Supplement provides supporting material for Abbott et al. (2016a). We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
© 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline, and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams
Identification of a BRCA2-specific modifier locus at 6p24 related to breast cancer risk
Women who carry BRCA2 mutations have an increased risk
of breast cancer that varies widely. To identify common
genetic variants that modify the breast cancer risk
associated with BRCA2 mutations, we have built upon
our previous work in which we examined genetic variants
across the genome in relation to breast cancer risk among
BRCA2 mutation carriers. Using a custom genotyping
platform with 211,155 genetic variants known as single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we genotyped 3,881
women who had breast cancer and 4,330 women without
breast cancer, which represents the largest possible,
international collection of BRCA2 mutation carriers. We
identified that a SNP located at 6p24 in the genome was
associated with lower risk of breast cancer. Importantly,
this SNP was not associated with breast cancer in BRCA1
mutation carriers or in a general population of women,
indicating that the breast cancer association with this SNP
might be specific to BRCA2 mutation carriers. Combining
this BRCA2-specific SNP with 13 other breast cancer risk
SNPs also known to modify risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers,
we were able to derive a risk prediction model that could
be useful in helping women with BRCA2 mutations weigh
their risk-reduction strategy options.Conceived and designed the experiments: P Hall, FJ Couch, J Simard, D
Altshuler, DF Easton, G Chenevix-Trench, AC Antoniou, K Offit. Performed the experiments: MM Gaudet, KB Kuchenbaecker, J Vijai, RJ
Klein, T Kirchhoff. Analyzed the data: MM Gaudet, KB Kuchenbaecker,
J Vijai, RJ Klein, L McGuffog, D Barrowdale, AM Dunning, J Simard, D
Altshuler, DF Easton, AC Antoniou, K Offit. Contributed reagents/
materials/analysis tools: L McGuffog, D Barrowdale, AM Dunning, A Lee,
J Dennis, S Healey, E Dicks, P Soucy, OM Sinilnikova, VS Pankratz, X
Wang, RC Eldridge, DC Tessier, D Vincent, F Bacot, FBL Hogervorst, S
Peock, D Stoppa-Lyonnet, P Peterlongo, RK Schmutzler, KL Nathanson,
M Piedmonte, CF Singer, M Thomassen, TvO Hansen, SL Neuhausen, I
Blanco, MH Greene, J Garber, JN Weitzel, IL Andrulis, DE Goldgar, E
DâAndrea, T Caldes, H Nevanlinna, A Osorio, EJ van Rensburg, A
Arason, G Rennert, AMW van den Ouweland, AH van der Hout, CM
Kets, CM Aalfs, JT Wijnen, MGEM Ausems, D Frost, S Ellis, E Fineberg,
R Platte, DG Evans, C Jacobs, J Adlard, M Tischkowitz, ME Porteous, F
Damiola, L Golmard, L Barjhoux, M Longy, M Belotti, SF Ferrer, S
Mazoyer, AB Spurdle, S Manoukian, M Barile, M Genuardi, N Arnold, A
Meindl, C Sutter, B Wappenschmidt, SM Domchek, G Pfeiler, E
Friedman, UB Jensen, M Robson, S Shah, C Lazaro, PL Mai, J Benitez,
MC Southey, MK Schmidt, PA Fasching, J Peto, MK Humphreys, Q
Wang, K Michailidou, EJ Sawyer, B Burwinkel, P GueÂŽnel, SE Bojesen, RL
Milne, H Brenner, M Lochmann, K Aittomaš ki, T Došrk, S Margolin, A
Mannermaa, D Lambrechts, J Chang-Claude, P Radice, GG Giles, CA
Haiman, R Winqvist, P Devillee, M GarcıŽa-Closas, N Schoof, MJ
Hooning, A Cox, PDP Pharoah, A Jakubowska, N Orr, A GonzaÂŽlez-Neira,
G Pita, MR Alonso, P Hall, FJ Couch, DF Easton, G Chenevix-Trench,
AC Antoniou, K Offit. Wrote the paper: MM Gaudet, KB Kuchenbaecker,
J Vijai, RJ Klein, AC Antoniou, K Offit.Figure S1 Cluster plots for SNPs (A.) rs9348512, (B.) rs619373,
and (C.) rs184577.Figure S2 Multidimensional scaling plots of the top two
principal components of genomic ancestry of all eligible BRCA2
iCOGS samples plotted with the HapMap CEU, ASI, and YRI
samples: (A.) samples from Finland and BRCA2 6174delT carriers
highlighted, and (B.) samples, indicated in red, with .19% non-
European ancestry were excluded.Figure S3 Quantileâquantile plot comparing expected and
observed distributions of P-values. Results displayed (A) for the
complete sample, (B) after excluding samples from the GWAS
discovery stage, and (C) for the complete sample and a set of SNPs
from the iCOGS array that were selected independent from the
results of the BRCA2 mutation carriers.Figure S4 Manhattan plot of P-values by chromosomal position
for 18,086 SNPs selected on the basis of a previously published
genome-wide association study of BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast
cancer associations results based on 4,330 breast cancer cases and
3,881 unaffected BRCA2 carriers.Figure S5 Forest plot of the country-specific, per-allele hazard
ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association
between breast cancer and rs9348512 genotypes.Figure S6 Forest plot of the country-specific, per-allele hazard
ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association with
breast cancer for (A.) rs619373 and (B.) rs184577 genotypes.Table S1 Quality control filtering steps for BRCA2 mutation
carriers and SNPs on the COGs array.Table S2 Description of breast cancer affected and unaffected
BRCA2 carriers included in the final analysis of the COGs array
SNPs.Table S3 Breast cancer hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence
intervals (CI) for all SNPs with P,1023 in a 500 Mb region
around rs9348512 on 6p24 among BRCA2 mutation carriers.Table S4 Associations with SNPs at 6p24, FGF13 and 2p22 and
breast and ovarian cancer risk using a competing risk analysis
model.Common genetic variants contribute to the observed variation in breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers; those
known to date have all been found through population-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To
comprehensively identify breast cancer risk modifying loci for BRCA2 mutation carriers, we conducted a deep replication
of an ongoing GWAS discovery study. Using the ranked P-values of the breast cancer associations with the imputed
genotype of 1.4 M SNPs, 19,029 SNPs were selected and designed for inclusion on a custom Illumina array that included a
total of 211,155 SNPs as part of a multi-consortial project. DNA samples from 3,881 breast cancer affected and 4,330
unaffected BRCA2 mutation carriers from 47 studies belonging to the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2
were genotyped and available for analysis. We replicated previously reported breast cancer susceptibility alleles in these
BRCA2 mutation carriers and for several regions (including FGFR2, MAP3K1, CDKN2A/B, and PTHLH) identified SNPs that have
stronger evidence of association than those previously published. We also identified a novel susceptibility allele at 6p24 that
was inversely associated with risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (rs9348512; per allele HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.80â0.90,
P = 3.9x10 8). This SNP was not associated with breast cancer risk either in the general population or in BRCA1 mutation
carriers. The locus lies within a region containing TFAP2A, which encodes a transcriptional activation protein that interacts
with several tumor suppressor genes. This report identifies the first breast cancer risk locus specific to a BRCA2 mutation
background. This comprehensive update of novel and previously reported breast cancer susceptibility loci contributes to
the establishment of a panel of SNPs that modify breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. This panel may have clinical
utility for women with BRCA2 mutations weighing options for medical prevention of breast cancer.This work was supported by the following institutions: iCOGS: The creation of the custom Illumina multiplex chip and the genotyping of the BRCA2
carriers in CIMBA was made possible by grants from the Starr Cancer Consortium I4-A402 (PI: K Offit), the Sandra Taub Memorial Fund of the Breast Cancer
Research Foundation (PI: K Offit), the Norman and Carol Stone Cancer Genetics Fund (PI: K Offit), and the European Commissionâs Seventh Framework Programme
grant agreement 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). AC Antoniou is a Cancer Research UK Senior Cancer Research Fellow. G Chenevix-Trench is an NHMRC Senior
Principal Research Fellow. Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 Associations: The CIMBA data management and data analysis were supported by Cancer Research
UK grants C12292/A11174 and C1287/A10118. S Healey is supported by an NHMRC Program Grant to G Chenevix-Trench. AC Antoniou is a Cancer Research UK
Senior Cancer Research Fellow. G Chenevix-Trench is an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. Amsterdam Breast Cancer Study: The ABCS study was
supported by the Dutch Cancer Society [grants NKI 2007-3839; 2009 4363]; BBMRI-NL, which is a Research Infrastructure financed by the Dutch government (NWO
184.021.007); and the Dutch National Genomics Initiative. Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Controls: The work of the BBCC was partly funded by ELANâFond of
the University Hospital of Erlangen. British Breast Cancer Study: The BBCS is funded by Cancer Research UK and Breakthrough Breast Cancer and acknowledges
NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). Breast Cancer Family Registry Studies: The Australian
Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS), New York City (New York Breast CFR), Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC-BCFR), Ontario Familial Breast
Cancer Registry (OFBCR), and Utah (Utah Breast CFR) work was supported by the United States National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), under
RFA-CA-06-503 (P30 CA13696 and P30 ES009089), and through cooperative agreements with members of the BCFR and Principal Investigators, including Cancer
Care Ontario (U01 CA69467), Columbia University (U01 CA69398), Cancer Prevention Institute of California (U01 CA69417), Fox Chase Cancer Center (U01
CA69631), Huntsman Cancer Institute (U01 CA69446), and University of Melbourne (U01 CA69638). The ABCFS was also supported by the National Health and
Medical Research Council of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia), and the Victorian Breast
Cancer Research Consortium. The New York BCFR site was also supported by NIH grants P30 CA13696 and P30 ES009089. MC Southey is a NHMRC Senior
Research Fellow and a Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium Group Leader. Baltic Familial Breast Ovarian Cancer Consortium: BFBOCC is partly supported
by: Lithuania (BFBOCC-LT), Research Council of Lithuania grant LIG-19/2010, and Hereditary Cancer Association (Paveldimo veËzËio asociacija). Latvia (BFBOCC-LV) is
partly supported by LSC grant 10.0010.08 and in part by a grant from the ESF Nr.2009/0220/1DP/1.1.1.2.0/09/APIA/VIAA/016. Breast Cancer in Galway Genetic
Study: Guyâs & St. Thomasâ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with Kingâs College London, United Kingdom. BRCA-gene mutations and breast cancer in South
African women: BMBSA was supported by grants from the Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) to EJ van Rensburg NIH R01CA74415 and P30 CA033752.
Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope: SL Neuhausen was partially supported by the Morris and Horowitz Families Endowed Professorship. BRICOH was
supported by NIH R01CA74415 and NIH P30 CA033752. Breast Cancer Study of the University Clinic Heidelberg: The BSUCH study was supported by the Dietmar-
Hopp Foundation, the Helmholtz Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). Rigshospitalet: The CBCS study was supported by the NEYE Foundation.
CECILE Breast Cancer Study: The CECILE study was funded by Fondation de France, Institut National du Cancer (INCa), Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Ligue
contre le Cancer Grand Ouest, Agence Nationale de SeÂŽcuriteÂŽ Sanitaire (ANSES), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR). Copenhagen General Population Study:
The CGPS was supported by the Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council and Herlev Hospital. Spanish
National Cancer Centre: The CNIO work was partially supported by Spanish Association against Cancer (AECC08), RTICC 06/0020/1060, FISPI08/1120, Mutua
MadrilenË a Foundation (FMMA) and SAF2010-20493. Spanish National Cancer Centre Breast Cancer Study: The CNIO-BCS was supported by the Genome Spain
Foundation, the Red TemaÂŽtica de InvestigacioÂŽn Cooperativa en CaÂŽncer and grants from the AsociacioÂŽn EspanË ola Contra el CaÂŽncer and the Fondo de InvestigacioÂŽn
Sanitario (PI11/00923 and PI081120). City of Hope Cancer Center: The City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network is supported by Award
Number RC4A153828 (PI: JN Weitzel) from the National Cancer Institute and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health. CONsorzio Studi ITaliani sui
Tumori Ereditari Alla Mammella: CONSIT TEAM was funded by grants from Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Special Project ââHereditary tumorsââ),
Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, IG 8713), Italian Ministry of Health (Extraordinary National Cancer Program 2006, ââAlleanza contro il Cancroââ and
ââProgetto Tumori Femminili), Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (Prin 2008) Centro di Ascolto Donne Operate al Seno (CAOS) association and
by funds from Italian citizens who allocated the 561000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to
Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects ââ561000ââ). German Cancer Research Center: The DKFZ study was supported by the DKFZ. Genen Omgeving studie
van de werkgroep Hereditiair Borstkanker Onderzoek Nederland: The DNA HEBON study is supported by the Dutch Cancer Society grants NKI1998-1854, NKI2004-
3088, NKI2007-3756, the NWO grant 91109024, the Pink Ribbon grant 110005, and the BBMRI grant CP46/NWO. Epidemiological study of BRCA1 & BRCA2
mutation carriers: EMBRACE is supported by Cancer Research UK Grants C1287/A10118 and C1287/A11990. DG Evans is supported by an NIHR grant to the
Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester. ESTHER Breast Cancer Study: The ESTHER study was supported by a grant from the Baden Wuš rttemberg Ministry of
Science, Research and Arts. Additional cases were recruited in the context of the VERDI study, which was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid
(Deutsche Krebshilfe). German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: GC-HBOC is supported by the German Cancer Aid (grant no 109076), by the
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), and by Deutsche Krebshilfe (107 352). GC-HBOC is supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Genetic Modifiers of cancer
risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: The GEMO study was supported by the Ligue National Contre le Cancer; the Association ââLe cancer du sein, parlons-en!ââ Award
and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the ââCIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancerââ program. Gene Environment Interaction and Breast Cancer in
Germany: The GENICA was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and
01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine
of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, as well as the Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Cecilia Zvocec,Qun Niu, physicians, genetic counselors, research nurses
and staff of the Cancer Risk Clinic for their contributions to this resource,
and the many families who contribute to our program.
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA): We thank Joyce
Seldon MSGC and Lorna Kwan MPH for assembling the data for this
study.
University of California San Francisco (UCSF): We would like to
thank Ms. Salina Chan for her data management and the following genetic
counselors for participant recruitment: Beth Crawford, Nicola Stewart,
Julie Mak, and Kate Lamvik.
United Kingdom Breakthrough Generations Study (UKBGS):
We thank Breakthrough Breast Cancer and the Institute of Cancer
Research for support of the Breakthrough Generations Study, and the
study participants, study staff, and the doctors, nurses, and other health
care providers and health information sources who have contributed to the
study.
United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Registries (UKFOCR):
We thank Simon Gayther, Susan Ramus, Carole Pye, Patricia
Harrington, and Eva Wozniak for their contributions towards the
UKFOCR.
Victorian Familial Cancer Trials Group (VFCTG): We acknowledge
Geoffrey Lindeman, Marion Harris, Martin Delatycki of the
Victorian Familial Cancer Trials Group. We thank Sarah Sawyer and
Rebecca Driessen for assembling this data and Ella Thompson for
performing all DNA amplification.
Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany. Gynecologic Oncology Group: This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group
(GOG) Administrative Office and Tissue Bank (CA 27469), the GOG Statistical and Data Center (CA 37517), and GOGâs Cancer Prevention and Control Committee
(CA 101165). MH Greene and PL Mai are supported by funding from the Intramural Research Program, NCI. Hospital Clinico San Carlos: HCSC was supported by a
grant RD06/0020/0021 from RTICC (ISCIII), Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity. Helsinki Breast Cancer Study: The HEBCS was financially supported by
the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (132473),the Finnish Cancer Society, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Sigrid Juselius
Foundation. Hannover-Minsk Breast Cancer Study: The HMBCS was supported by a grant from the Friends of Hannover Medical School and by the Rudolf Bartling
Foundation. Study of Genetic Mutations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer patients in Hong Kong and Asia: HRBCP is supported by The Hong Kong Hereditary Breast
Cancer Family Registry and the Dr. Ellen Li Charitable Foundation, Hong Kong. Molecular Genetic Studies of Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Hungary: Hungarian
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Study was supported by Hungarian Research Grant KTIA-OTKA CK-80745 and the Norwegian EEA Financial Mechanism HU0115/
NA/2008-3/Oš P-9. Institut Catala` dâOncologia: The ICO study was supported by the AsociacioÂŽn EspanË ola Contra el CaÂŽncer, Spanish Health Research Foundation,
RamoÂŽn Areces Foundation, Carlos III Health Institute, Catalan Health Institute, and Autonomous Government of Catalonia and contract grant numbers
ISCIIIRETIC RD06/0020/1051, PI09/02483, PI10/01422, PI10/00748, 2009SGR290, and 2009SGR283. Iceland LandspitaliâUniversity Hospital: The ILUH group was
supported by the Icelandic Association ââWalking for Breast Cancer Researchââ and by the Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund. INterdisciplinary
HEalth Research Internal Team BReast CAncer susceptibility: INHERIT work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the ââCIHR Team in
Familial Risks of Breast Cancerââ program, the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance grant 019511 and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation
and Export Trade grant PSR-SIIRI-701. J Simard is Chairholder of the Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics. Istituto Oncologico Veneto: The IOVHBOCS study
was supported by Ministero dellâIstruzione, dellâUniversita` e della Ricerca and Ministero della Salute (ââProgetto Tumori Femminiliââ and RFPS 2006-5-341353,
ACC2/R6.9ââ). Karolinska Breast Cancer Study: The KARBAC study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, the Gustav V Jubilee Foundation, and the Bert
von Kantzow Foundation. Kuopio Breast Cancer Project: The KBCP was financially supported by the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants, Cancer Fund of North Savo, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, the Academy of Finland, and by the strategic funding of the University of Eastern
Finland. Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer: kConFab is supported by grants from the National Breast Cancer Foundation
and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and by the Queensland Cancer Fund; the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria,
Tasmania, and South Australia; and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. G Chenevix-Trench and AB Spurdle are NHMRC Senior Research Fellows.
Financial support for the AOCS was provided by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-01-1-0729], the Cancer Council of
Tasmania and Cancer Foundation of Western Australia, and the NHMRC [199600]. G Chenevix-Trench is supported by the NHMRC. The Clinical Follow Up Study
(funded 2001â2009 by NHMRC and currently by the National Breast Cancer Foundation and Cancer Australia #628333) Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer Study:
KOHBRA is supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea
(1020350). Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Centre: LMBC is supported by the âStichting tegen Kankerâ (232-2008 and 196-2010). D Lambrechts is supported by
the FWO and the KULPFV/10/016-SymBioSysII. Mammary Carcinoma Risk Factor Investigation: The MARIE study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.
[70-2892-BR I], the Hamburg Cancer Society, the German Cancer Research Center, and the genotype work in part by the Federal Ministry of Education and
Research (BMBF) Germany [01KH0402]. Mayo Clinic: MAYO is supported by NIH grant CA128978, an NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in
Breast Cancer (CA116201), a U.S. Department of Defence Ovarian Cancer Idea award (W81XWH-10-1-0341), and grants from the Breast Cancer Research
Foundation and the Komen Foundation for the Cure. Milan Breast Cancer Study Group: MBCSG was funded by grants from Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca
sul Cancro (Special Project ââHereditary tumorsââ), Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC, IG 8713), Italian Ministry of Health (ââProgetto Tumori Femminiliââ),
and by Italian citizens who allocated the 561000 share of their tax payment in supp
Localization and Broadband Follow-up of the Gravitational-wave Transient GW150914
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by
the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)
detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098
and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By
prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and
sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers
covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths
with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the
low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of
the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up
observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates
Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities,
the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline, and depth of the
observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger,
there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM)
signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a
counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and
highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community
and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron
star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and
results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by
the individual teams.
</p
Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger
On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later
designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through
gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors.
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray
burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of ⌠1.7 {{s}} with respect to
the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was
initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a
luminosity distance of {40}-8+8 Mpc and with
component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses
were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 {M}ÈŻ
. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the
electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical
transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC
4993 (at ⌠40 {{Mpc}}) less than 11 hours after the merger by the
One-Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The
optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an
hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment.
Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded
within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward
evolution over âŒ10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and
radio emission were discovered at the transientâs position ⌠9
and ⌠16 days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and
radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct
from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No
ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with
the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support
the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron
stars in NGC 4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and
a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process
nuclei synthesized in the ejecta.</p