Evaluation of techniques to break seed dormancy in Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus)

If we understand factors that trigger seed dormancy release, then we can accurately predict whether the seed will remain dormant or germinate out of the seed bank. With regards to annual weed species, detailed understanding of what breaks seed dormancy is therefore critical for determining how many weed seeds will germinate into problematic weeds. To investigate the breaking of dormancy in weed seeds, we conducted an experiment with Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Dormant seeds were treated with cold stratification (4 °C for 30 days), application of gibberellic acid (at 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 parts per million) or ultrasound (for 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes), soaking in hot water (90 °C for 3, 5, 7 and 10 minutes) or 98% sulfuric acid (for 1, 2 and 3 minutes) to determine which treatment most effectively broke dormancy. The results showed that Redroot pigweed seed dormancy was effectively broken by cold stratification, gibberellic acid, or ultrasound. Short treatments with hot water had minimal effect while longer times or treatment with sulfuric acid eliminated seed germination. In addition to germination percentage, germination rate, plumule length, radicle length, seedling length, seedling dry weight, and seed vigor index were also measured; similarly application of gibberellic acid had the most significant effect on these parameters. The results of this study add to our understanding of what processes effectively or ineffectively break Redroot pigweed seed dormancy and promote growth

Global epidemiology and clinical outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and associated carbapenemases (POP): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) is a global threat, but the distribution and clinical significance of carbapenemases are unclear. The aim of this study was to define characteristics and outcomes of CRPA infections and the global frequency and clinical impact of carbapenemases harboured by CRPA. METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective cohort study of CRPA isolated from bloodstream, respiratory, urine, or wound cultures of patients at 44 hospitals (10 countries) between Dec 1, 2018, and Nov 30, 2019. Clinical data were abstracted from health records and CRPA isolates were whole-genome sequenced. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality from the day the index culture was collected. We compared outcomes of patients with CRPA infections by infection type and across geographic regions and performed an inverse probability weighted analysis to assess the association between carbapenemase production and 30-day mortality. FINDINGS: We enrolled 972 patients (USA n=527, China n=171, south and central America n=127, Middle East n=91, Australia and Singapore n=56), of whom 581 (60%) had CRPA infections. 30-day mortality differed by infection type (bloodstream 21 [30%] of 69, respiratory 69 [19%] of 358, wound nine [14%] of 66, urine six [7%] of 88; p=0·0012) and geographical region (Middle East 15 [29%] of 52, south and central America 20 [27%] of 73, USA 60 [19%] of 308, Australia and Singapore three [11%] of 28, China seven [6%] of 120; p=0·0002). Prevalence of carbapenemase genes among CRPA isolates also varied by region (south and central America 88 [69%] of 127, Australia and Singapore 32 [57%] of 56, China 54 [32%] of 171, Middle East 27 [30%] of 91, USA ten [2%] of 527; p\u3c0·0001). KPC-2 (n=103 [49%]) and VIM-2 (n=75 [36%]) were the most common carbapenemases in 211 carbapenemase-producing isolates. After excluding USA patients, because few US isolates had carbapenemases, patients with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections had higher 30-day mortality than those with non-carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections in both unadjusted (26 [22%] of 120 vs 19 [12%] of 153; difference 9%, 95% CI 3-16) and adjusted (difference 7%, 95% CI 1-14) analyses. INTERPRETATION: The emergence of different carbapenemases among CRPA isolates in different geographical regions and the increased mortality associated with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections highlight the therapeutic challenges posed by these organisms. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health

Epidemiología mundial y resultados clínicos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistente a carbapenemes y carbapenemasas asociadas (POP): un estudio prospectivo de cohortes

Antecedentes: La Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistente a los carbapenemes (CRPA) es una amenaza mundial, pero la distribución y la importancia clínica de las carbapenemasas no están claras. El objetivo de este estudio fue definir las características y los resultados de las infecciones por CRPA, así como la frecuencia global y el impacto clínico de las carbapenemasas albergadas por CRPA. Métodos: Llevamos a cabo un estudio de cohortes observacional y prospectivo de CRPA aislados de cultivos de torrente sanguíneo, respiratorio, orina o heridas de pacientes en 44 hospitales (10 países) entre el 1 de diciembre de 2018 y el 30 de noviembre de 2019. Los datos clínicos se extrajeron de los registros de salud y los aislados de CRPA se secuenciaron en todo el genoma. El resultado primario fue la mortalidad a 30 días a partir del día en que se recolectó el cultivo índice. Se compararon los resultados de los pacientes con infecciones por CRPA por tipo de infección y entre regiones geográficas y se realizó un análisis ponderado de probabilidad inversa para evaluar la asociación entre la producción de carbapenemasas y la mortalidad a 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 972 pacientes (EE.UU. n=527, China n=171, América del Sur y Central n=127, Oriente Medio n=91, Australia y Singapur n=56), de los cuales 581 (60%) tenían infecciones por CRPA. La mortalidad a los 30 días difería según el tipo de infección (torrente sanguíneo 21 [30%] de 69, respiratoria 69 [19%] de 358, herida nueve [14%] de 66, orina seis [7%] de 88; p=0-0012) y la región geográfica (Oriente Medio 15 [29%] de 52, América del Sur y Central 20 [27%] de 73, EE.UU. 60 [19%] de 308, Australia y Singapur tres [11%] de 28, China siete [6%] de 120; p=0-0002). La prevalencia de genes carbapenemasa entre los aislados CRPA también varió según la región (América del Sur y Central 88 [69%] de 127, Australia y Singapur 32 [57%] de 56, China 54 [32%] de 171, Oriente Medio 27 [30%] de 91, EE.UU. diez [2%] de 527; p<0-0001). KPC-2 (n=103 [49%]) y VIM-2 (n=75 [36%]) fueron las carbapenemasas más comunes en 211 aislados productores de carbapenemasas. Después de excluir a los pacientes de EE.UU., porque pocos aislados de EE.UU. tenían carbapenemasas, los pacientes con infecciones por CRPA productoras de carbapenemasas tuvieron una mayor mortalidad a los 30 días que aquellos con infecciones por CRPA no productoras de carbapenemasas, tanto en los análisis no ajustados (26 [22%] de 120 frente a 19 [12%] de 153; diferencia 9%, IC 95% 3-16) como ajustados (diferencia 7%, IC 95% 1-14). Interpretación: La aparición de diferentes carbapenemasas entre los aislados de CRPA en diferentes regiones geográficas y el aumento de la mortalidad asociada a las infecciones por CRPA productores de carbapenemasas ponen de manifiesto los retos terapéuticos que plantean estos organismos. Financiación: Institutos Nacionales de Salud.Background: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) is a global threat, but the distribution and clinical significance of carbapenemases are unclear. The aim of this study was to define characteristics and outcomes of CRPA infections and the global frequency and clinical impact of carbapenemases harboured by CRPA. Methods: We conducted an observational, prospective cohort study of CRPA isolated from bloodstream, respiratory, urine, or wound cultures of patients at 44 hospitals (10 countries) between Dec 1, 2018, and Nov 30, 2019. Clinical data were abstracted from health records and CRPA isolates were whole-genome sequenced. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality from the day the index culture was collected. We compared outcomes of patients with CRPA infections by infection type and across geographic regions and performed an inverse probability weighted analysis to assess the association between carbapenemase production and 30-day mortality. Findings: We enrolled 972 patients (USA n=527, China n=171, south and central America n=127, Middle East n=91, Australia and Singapore n=56), of whom 581 (60%) had CRPA infections. 30-day mortality differed by infection type (bloodstream 21 [30%] of 69, respiratory 69 [19%] of 358, wound nine [14%] of 66, urine six [7%] of 88; p=0·0012) and geographical region (Middle East 15 [29%] of 52, south and central America 20 [27%] of 73, USA 60 [19%] of 308, Australia and Singapore three [11%] of 28, China seven [6%] of 120; p=0·0002). Prevalence of carbapenemase genes among CRPA isolates also varied by region (south and central America 88 [69%] of 127, Australia and Singapore 32 [57%] of 56, China 54 [32%] of 171, Middle East 27 [30%] of 91, USA ten [2%] of 527; p<0·0001). KPC-2 (n=103 [49%]) and VIM-2 (n=75 [36%]) were the most common carbapenemases in 211 carbapenemase-producing isolates. After excluding USA patients, because few US isolates had carbapenemases, patients with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections had higher 30-day mortality than those with non-carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections in both unadjusted (26 [22%] of 120 vs 19 [12%] of 153; difference 9%, 95% CI 3–16) and adjusted (difference 7%, 95% CI 1–14) analyses. Interpretation: The emergence of different carbapenemases among CRPA isolates in different geographical regions and the increased mortality associated with carbapenemase-producing CRPA infections highlight the therapeutic challenges posed by these organisms. Funding: National Institutes of Health

A pandemic recap : lessons we have learned

On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.Non peer reviewe

The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery : defining a model for antimicrobial stewardship-results from an international cross-sectional survey

Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. Results: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p <0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). Conclusion: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.Peer reviewe

Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe

Ten golden rules for optimal antibiotic use in hospital settings: the WARNING call to action

Antibiotics are recognized widely for their benefits when used appropriately. However, they are often used inappropriately despite the importance of responsible use within good clinical practice. Effective antibiotic treatment is an essential component of universal healthcare, and it is a global responsibility to ensure appropriate use. Currently, pharmaceutical companies have little incentive to develop new antibiotics due to scientific, regulatory, and financial barriers, further emphasizing the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. To address this issue, the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery established an international multidisciplinary task force of 295 experts from 115 countries with different backgrounds. The task force developed a position statement called WARNING (Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance National/International Network Group) aimed at raising awareness of antimicrobial resistance and improving antibiotic prescribing practices worldwide. The statement outlined is 10 axioms, or “golden rules,” for the appropriate use of antibiotics that all healthcare workers should consistently adhere in clinical practice

Effect of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem on 30-day mortality for patients with e coli or klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance a randomized clinical trial

WOS: 000444341400012PubMed ID: 30208454IMPORTANCE Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases mediate resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (eg, ceftriaxone) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Significant infections caused by these strains are usually treated with carbapenems, potentially selecting for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be an effective "carbapenem-sparing" option to treat extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. OBJECTIVES To determine whether definitive therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam is noninferior to meropenem (a carbapenem) in patients with bloodstream infection caused by ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible E coli or K pneumoniae. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Noninferiority, parallel group, randomized clinical trial included hospitalized patients enrolled from 26 sites in 9 countries from February 2014 to July 2017. Adult patients were eligible if they had at least 1 positive blood culture with E coli or Klebsiella spp testing nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. Of 1646 patients screened, 391 were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned 1: 1 to intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, every 6 hours (n = 188 participants) or meropenem, 1 g, every 8 hours (n = 191 participants) for a minimum of 4 days, up to a maximum of 14 days, with the total duration determined by the treating clinician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization. A noninferiority margin of 5% was used. RESULTS Among 379 patients (mean age, 66.5 years; 47.8% women) who were randomized appropriately, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were included in the primary analysis population, 378 (99.7%) completed the trial and were assessed for the primary outcome. A total of 23 of 187 patients (12.3%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome of mortality at 30 days compared with 7 of 191 (3.7%) randomized to meropenem (risk difference, 8.6%[1-sided 97.5% CI, -infinity to 14.5%]; P = .90 for noninferiority). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Nonfatal serious adverse events occurred in 5 of 188 patients (2.7%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 3 of 191 (1.6%) in the meropenem group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with E coli or K pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance, definitive treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem did not result in a noninferior 30-day mortality. These findings do not support use of piperacillin-tazobactam in this setting.University of Queensland; Australian Society for Antimicrobials (ASA); International Society for Chemotherapy (ISC); National University Hospital Singapore Clinician Researcher Grant [NUHSRO/2014/121/CRG/07]; Australian Infectious Disease Centre; Australian Genome Research Facility; Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Foundation; Study, Education, and Research Committee (SERC) of Pathology Queensland; National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship; Australian Postgraduate Award from the University of Queensland; NHMRC Career Development and Practitioner Fellowship; NHMRC Practitioner FellowshipThe study was sponsored by the University of Queensland. This study was funded by grants from the Australian Society for Antimicrobials (ASA), International Society for Chemotherapy (ISC), National University Hospital Singapore Clinician Researcher Grant NUHSRO/2014/121/CRG/07. Whole-genome sequencing was funded by grants from the Australian Infectious Disease Centre and Australian Genome Research Facility; the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Foundation; and the Study, Education, and Research Committee (SERC) of Pathology Queensland. Dr Beatson was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship during the course of the trial. Dr Harris was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award from the University of Queensland. Dr Peleg was supported by a NHMRC Career Development and Practitioner Fellowship during the course of the trial. Dr Paterson was supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship during the course of the trial