6 research outputs found
Axillary lymph node imaging in mRNA, vector-based, and mix-and-match COVID-19 vaccine recipients: ultrasound features
Objectives To assess ultrasound characteristics of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes after two doses of four different COVID-19
vaccination protocols, to determine whether these parameters differed with age, and to describe how they changed on follow-up
imaging.
Methods A total of 247 volunteer employees from our center who had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccination were
recruited and followed prospectively. Axillary ultrasound of the ipsilateral vaccinated arm was performed the week after
receiving the second dose to analyze lymph node features (number, long-axis, cortical thickness, morphology, and vascular
imaging). Axillary lymphadenopathy resulting from four vaccination protocols—mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273),
ChAdOx1-S, and mix-and-match—was compared. Analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis
with Bonferroni corrections. Nodal reactogenicity was evaluated for two age groups: young (< 45 years old) and middle-aged ( ≥
45 years old). All parameters were compared between both groups using an unpaired-sample Student t test. A p value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results Significantly higher values for total number of visible nodes, cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification (p < 0.001), and
vascularity (p < 0.05) were observed in mRNA vaccine recipients compared to full ChAdOx1-S protocol recipients. Moreover,
mix-and-match protocol recipients showed greater nodal cortical thickness and higher Bedi’s classification than full ChAdOx1-S
recipients (p < 0.001). Analyses between age groups revealed greater cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification, and color Doppler
signal in younger patients (p < 0.05).
Conclusions Nodal parameters of Bedi’s classification and cortical thickness were more often increased in mRNA and mix-andmatch vaccine recipients when compared to ChAdOx1-S vaccine alone, especially in younger patients.
Key Points
• Hyperplastic lymphadenopathy was observed more frequently in mRNA and mix-and-match vaccine protocols compared to full
vector-based vaccination.
• Higher values for cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification, and color Doppler signal parameters were identified in younger
patients.
• Observed lymph node findings normalized in greater than 80% of patients by the third month following vaccination
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe
Axillary lymph node imaging in mRNA, vector-based, and mix-and-match COVID-19 vaccine recipients: ultrasound features
Objectives To assess ultrasound characteristics of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes after two doses of four different COVID-19
vaccination protocols, to determine whether these parameters differed with age, and to describe how they changed on follow-up
imaging.
Methods A total of 247 volunteer employees from our center who had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccination were
recruited and followed prospectively. Axillary ultrasound of the ipsilateral vaccinated arm was performed the week after
receiving the second dose to analyze lymph node features (number, long-axis, cortical thickness, morphology, and vascular
imaging). Axillary lymphadenopathy resulting from four vaccination protocols—mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273),
ChAdOx1-S, and mix-and-match—was compared. Analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis
with Bonferroni corrections. Nodal reactogenicity was evaluated for two age groups: young (< 45 years old) and middle-aged ( ≥
45 years old). All parameters were compared between both groups using an unpaired-sample Student t test. A p value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results Significantly higher values for total number of visible nodes, cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification (p < 0.001), and
vascularity (p < 0.05) were observed in mRNA vaccine recipients compared to full ChAdOx1-S protocol recipients. Moreover,
mix-and-match protocol recipients showed greater nodal cortical thickness and higher Bedi’s classification than full ChAdOx1-S
recipients (p < 0.001). Analyses between age groups revealed greater cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification, and color Doppler
signal in younger patients (p < 0.05).
Conclusions Nodal parameters of Bedi’s classification and cortical thickness were more often increased in mRNA and mix-andmatch vaccine recipients when compared to ChAdOx1-S vaccine alone, especially in younger patients.
Key Points
• Hyperplastic lymphadenopathy was observed more frequently in mRNA and mix-and-match vaccine protocols compared to full
vector-based vaccination.
• Higher values for cortical thickness, Bedi’s classification, and color Doppler signal parameters were identified in younger
patients.
• Observed lymph node findings normalized in greater than 80% of patients by the third month following vaccination
Minimally invasive tumor bed implant (MITBI) and peri-operative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) for accelerated minimal breast irradiation (AMBI) or anticipated boost (A-PHDRBT-boost) in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ
Purpose: To evaluate our institutional experience of minimally invasive tumor bed implantation (MITBI) during
breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to deliver peri-operative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) as accelerated minimal breast irradiation (AMBI) or anticipated boost (A-PHDRBT-boost).
Material and methods: Patients older than 40, with clinical and radiological unifocal DCIS < 3 cm were considered
potential candidates for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and were implanted during BCS using MITBItechnique. Patients who in final pathology reports showed free margins and no other microscopic tumor foci, received
AMBI with PHDRBT (3.4 Gy BID in 5 days). Patients with adverse features received A-PHDRBT-boost with post-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
Results: Forty-one patients were implanted, and 36 were treated and analyzed. According to final pathology,
24 (67%) patients were suitable for AMBI and 12 (33%) were qualified for A-PHDRBT-boost. Reoperation rate for those
with clear margins was 16.6% (6/36); this rate increased to 33% (4/12) for G3 histology, and 66% (4/6) were rescued
using AMBI. Early complications were documented in 5 patients (14%). With a median follow-up of 97 (range, 42-138)
months, 5-year rates of local, elsewhere, locoregional, and distant control were all 97.2%. 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor
recurrence rates (IBTR) were 5.6% (2/36), 8.3% (2/24) for AMBI, and 0% (0/12) for A-PHDRBT-boost patients. Both
instances of IBTR were confirmed G3 tumors in pre-operative biopsies; no IBTR was documented in G1-2 tumors.
Cosmetic outcomes were excellent/good in 96% of AMBI vs. 67% in A-PHDRBT-boost (p = 0.034).
Conclusions: The MITBI-PHDRBT program allows selection of patients with excellent prognoses (G1-2 DCIS with
negative margins and no multifocality), for whom AMBI could be a good alternative with low recurrence rate, decrease
of unnecessary radiation, treatment logistics improvement, and over-treatment reduction. Patients whose pre-operative biopsy showed G3 tumor, presents with inferior local control and more risk of reoperation due to positive margins
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical science. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press