Social Media Use by Residents and Faculty in Otolaryngology Training Programs.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the growth of social media in healthcare, the appropriateness of online friendships between otolaryngological residents and attendings is poorly defined in the current literature. This issue is of growing importance, particularly as residency programs increasingly utilize social media as a means of connecting with and evaluating applicants due to limited in-person experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to better understand the prevalence of and concerns surrounding social media use between residents and faculty. METHODS: This study sent out 2 surveys in 2017 to all United States Otolaryngology residency program directors to disperse to their residents and attendings, respectively. RESULTS: We received a response from 72 residents and 98 attendings. Our findings show that social media is commonly used by both residents and attendings, and most residents have at least 1 online friendship with an attending. Resident and attending opinions diverge on topics such as appropriateness of use, privacy settings, and professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: We call on residency programs to delineate a transparent social media policy so applicant expectations on social media are clear

Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe

Medical Students and Staff Physicians: The Question of Social Media.

© 2017, © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2017. Social media’s prevalence among the professional world is rapidly increasing. Its use among medical personnel—specifically, medical students, resident physicians, and staff physicians—could compromise personal-professional boundaries. Could the acceptance or lack of acceptance of a friend request bias the medical student application process? If friend requests are accepted, then medical students, resident physicians, and staff physicians are provided access to very personal aspects of one another’s lives, which may not have been the intent. The question remains whether the separation of one’s personal life from work is necessary. Should medical students restrict social media relationships with residents and staff physicians to professional social media networks? The suitability and opportunities of social media among medical professionals is an ongoing issue for research that needs continued evaluation

Medical Students and Staff Physicians: The Question of Social Media

© 2017, © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2017. Social media’s prevalence among the professional world is rapidly increasing. Its use among medical personnel—specifically, medical students, resident physicians, and staff physicians—could compromise personal-professional boundaries. Could the acceptance or lack of acceptance of a friend request bias the medical student application process? If friend requests are accepted, then medical students, resident physicians, and staff physicians are provided access to very personal aspects of one another’s lives, which may not have been the intent. The question remains whether the separation of one’s personal life from work is necessary. Should medical students restrict social media relationships with residents and staff physicians to professional social media networks? The suitability and opportunities of social media among medical professionals is an ongoing issue for research that needs continued evaluation

Biocompatibility of On-command dissolvable tympanostomy tube in the rat model.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: A prototype tympanostomy tube, composed of (polybutyl/methyl methacrylate-co-dimethyl amino ethyl methacrylate (PBM)), was tested to (1) evaluate the effect of PBM tubes on rat dermis as a corollary for biocompatibility and (2) to observe the efficacy of dissolution with isopropyl alcohol (iPrOH) and ethanol (EtOH). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A two-part study was conducted to assess biocompatible substance with inducible dissolvability as a critical characteristic for a newly engineered tympanostomy tube. First, tympanostomy tubes were inserted subcutaneously in 10 rats, which served as an animal model for biosafety and compared to traditional tubes with respect to histologic reaction. Tissue surrounding the PBM prototype tubes was submitted for histopathology and demonstrated no tissue reactivity or signs of major inflammation. In the second part, we evaluated the dissolvability of the tube with either isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, ofloxacin, ciprodex, water, and soapy water. PBM tubes were exposed to decreasing concentrations of iPrOH and EtOH with interval qualitative assessment of dissolution. RESULTS: (1) Histologic examination did not reveal pathology with PBM tubes; (2) Concentrations of at least 50% iPrOH and EtOH dissolve PBM tubes within 48 hours while concentrations of at least 75% iPrOH and EtOH were required for dissolution when exposure was limited to four 20-minute intervals. CONCLUSION: PBM is biocompatible in the rat model. Additionally, PBM demonstrates rapid dissolution upon alcohol-based stimuli, validating the proof-of-concept of dissolvable “on-command” or biocommandible ear tubes. Further testing of PBM is needed with a less ototoxic dissolver and in a better simulated middle ear environment, before testing can be performed in humans

Social Media Use by Residents and Faculty in Otolaryngology Training Programs

OBJECTIVES: Despite the growth of social media in healthcare, the appropriateness of online friendships between otolaryngological residents and attendings is poorly defined in the current literature. This issue is of growing importance, particularly as residency programs increasingly utilize social media as a means of connecting with and evaluating applicants due to limited in-person experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to better understand the prevalence of and concerns surrounding social media use between residents and faculty. METHODS: This study sent out 2 surveys in 2017 to all United States Otolaryngology residency program directors to disperse to their residents and attendings, respectively. RESULTS: We received a response from 72 residents and 98 attendings. Our findings show that social media is commonly used by both residents and attendings, and most residents have at least 1 online friendship with an attending. Resident and attending opinions diverge on topics such as appropriateness of use, privacy settings, and professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: We call on residency programs to delineate a transparent social media policy so applicant expectations on social media are clear