68 research outputs found

    Gene transfer of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor improves the function of lung allografts

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundTumor necrosis factor is an important mediator of lung transplant acute rejection. Soluble type I tumor necrosis factor receptor binds to tumor necrosis factor-α and -β and inhibits their function. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate efficient in vivo gene transfer of a soluble type I tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein (sTNF-RI-Ig) and determine its effects on lung allograft acute rejection.MethodsThree groups of Fischer rats (n = 6 per group) underwent recipient intramuscular transfection 24 hours before transplantation with saline, 1 × 1010 plaque-forming units of control adenovirus encoding β-galactosidase, or 1 × 1010 plaque-forming units of adenovirus encoding human sTNF-RI-Ig (Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig). One group (n = 6) received recipient intramuscular transfection with 1 × 1010 Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig at the time of transplantation. Brown Norway donor lung grafts were stored for 5 hours before orthotopic lung transplantation. Graft function and rejection scores were assessed 5 days after transplantation. Time-dependent transgene expression in muscle, serum, and lung grafts were evaluated by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of human soluble type I tumor necrosis factor receptor.ResultsRecipient intramuscular transfection with 1 × 1010 plaque-forming units of Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig significantly improved arterial oxygenation when delivered 24 hours before transplantation compared with saline, β-galactosidase, and Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig transfection at the time of transplantation (435.8 ± 106.6 mm Hg vs 142.3 ± 146.3 mm Hg, 177.4 ± 153.7 mm Hg, and 237.3 ± 185.2 mm Hg; P = .002, .005, and .046, respectively). Transgene expression was time dependent, and there was a trend toward lower vascular rejection scores (P = .066) in the Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig group transfected 24 hours before transplantation.ConclusionsRecipient intramuscular Ad.sTNF-RI-Ig gene transfer improves allograft function in a well-established model of acute rejection. Maximum benefit was observed when transfection occurred 24 hours before transplantation

    Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates rat lung allograft rejection

    Get PDF
    AbstractRecently, the inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase has been shown to be an important immunomodulation molecule in allograft rejection. We have observed the production of nitric oxide during rejection and the effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on allograft rejection in a rat lung transplant model. Rat left lung allotransplants were performed in two strain combinations: brown Norway–to–F344 (major histocompatibility complex incompatible); and Lewis-to-F344 (minor loci incompatible) as severe and mild rejection models respectively. Syngeneic F344-to-F344 transplants were performed as a negative control. Nitric oxide production during rejection was determined by measuring the recipient's serum nitrite/nitrate levels as a stable end product of nitric oxide. The progression of rejection was evaluated radiographically and the grade of rejection was determined histologically. After operation, recipients of allotransplantation were randomly divided into two groups and received either aminoguanidine (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneal every 6 hours), a potent inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, or normal saline treatment. The levels of serum nitrite and nitrate in recipients increased in the early phase of rejection in both allotransplant combinations. However, in the terminal phase of rejection, the serum nitrite/nitrate level decreased significantly compared with the peak level in the brown Norway–to–F344 recipients. The serum nitrite/nitrate levels in the syngeneic transplant recipients were normal during the entire observation period. In aminoguanidine-treated animals, serum nitrite/nitrate levels remained normal in both allograft combinations. Significant suppression of rejection in aminoguanidine-treated recipients was observed histologically and radiographically in comparison with untreated recipients in the brown Norway–to–F344 combination. In the Lewis-to-F344 combination, aminoguanidine treatment significantly ameliorated histologic rejection but did not affect radiologic appearance. We therefore conclude nitric oxide is produced during early allograft rejection and may prove to be a marker and mediator of early rejection. The inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase results in significant reduction in rat lung allograft rejection. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1995;110:1449-60

    Central memory CD8+ T lymphocytes mediate lung allograft acceptance

    Get PDF
    Memory T lymphocytes are commonly viewed as a major barrier for long-term survival of organ allografts and are thought to accelerate rejection responses due to their rapid infiltration into allografts, low threshold for activation, and ability to produce inflammatory mediators. Because memory T cells are usually associated with rejection, preclinical protocols have been developed to target this population in transplant recipients. Here, using a murine model, we found that costimulatory blockade–mediated lung allograft acceptance depended on the rapid infiltration of the graft by central memory CD8(+) T cells (CD44(hi)CD62L(hi)CCR7(+)). Chemokine receptor signaling and alloantigen recognition were required for trafficking of these memory T cells to lung allografts. Intravital 2-photon imaging revealed that CCR7 expression on CD8(+) T cells was critical for formation of stable synapses with antigen-presenting cells, resulting in IFN-γ production, which induced NO and downregulated alloimmune responses. Thus, we describe a critical role for CD8(+) central memory T cells in lung allograft acceptance and highlight the need for tailored approaches for tolerance induction in the lung

    Defining the Critical Hurdles in Cancer Immunotherapy

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT: Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators, others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet be overcome to improve outcomes of patients with cancer

    Unagreement is an illusion

    Get PDF
    This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9311-yThis paper proposes an analysis of unagreement, a phenomenon involving an apparent mismatch between a definite third person plural subject and first or second person plural subject agreement observed in various null subject languages (e.g. Spanish, Modern Greek and Bulgarian), but notoriously absent in others (e.g. Italian, European Portuguese). A cross-linguistic correlation between unagreement and the structure of adnominal pronoun constructions suggests that the availability of unagreement depends on whether person and definiteness are hosted by separate heads (in languages like Greek) or bundled on a single head (i.e. pronominal determiners in languages like Italian). Null spell-out of the head hosting person features high in the extended nominal projection of the subject leads to unagreement. The lack of unagreement in languages with pronominal determiners results from the interaction of their syntactic structure with the properties of the vocabulary items realising the head encoding both person and definiteness. The analysis provides a principled explanation for the cross-linguistic distribution of unagreement and suggests a unified framework for deriving unagreement, adnominal pronoun constructions, personal pronouns and pro

    Defining the critical hurdles in cancer immunotherapy

    Get PDF
    Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer

    Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

    Get PDF
    Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe
    corecore