45 research outputs found

    Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

    Get PDF
    Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe

    Evidence of critical thinking during music listening : case studies of three high school students / by Colleen M. Conway.

    No full text
    viii, 85 leaves ; 28 cm.Critical thinking, a major goal of education, is an important factor in becoming an independent musician. This study explored dimensions of critical listening including: a) what do students think and audiate when they are listening, b) how do they respond to certain types of music, c) what decisions do they make while listening, and d) how does their level performance experience relate to their listening responses? A case study format was used to carefully observe the listening patterns of students. Three case members chosen from the private studio of the researcher heard a 3-5 minute musical example. The instructions to the student were to listen carefully to the example. After the first hearing students instructed that during the second hearing they were to stop the recording at any time to share what they heard. Upon the completion of the second hearing, students were interviewed about what they heard. Each listening session followed this procedure three times, once for each musical selection. Case members were video-taped while they were listening to capture any non-verbal communication that took place during listening and interviewing. The analysis of the data involved dividing the case evidence into several areas of interest for each piece. Several of the areas were identified before the study through the interview questions. Others were identified because all case members attended to those areas in some way. The results of this analysis presented several factors which seemed to affect the students’ listening responses. Responses were apparently affected by each student’s personality, verbalization ability, gender, physical reactions to music, aptitude, experience, and extramusical interests. These results provide guidelines for a model for exploring the listening patterns of high school students. They also provide the researcher and other high school teachers with qualitative information about the listening patterns of these students. Studio teachers will be able to use this information to better plan listening lessons
    corecore