54 research outputs found

    Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search

    Get PDF
    Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Peer reviewe

    Ancient Chinese orchid cultivation. A fresh look at an age-old practice

    No full text
    10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00137-0Scientia Horticulturae871-21-10SHRT

    Orchid pseudobulbs - 'False' bulbs with a genuine importance in orchid growth and survival!

    No full text
    10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00084-9Scientia Horticulturae833-4165-172SHRT

    The importance of photoassimilate contribution from the current shoot and connected back shoots to inflorescence size in the thin-leaved sympodial orchid Oncidium goldiana

    No full text
    10.1086/297267International Journal of Plant Sciences1564450-459IPLS

    Plant growth regulators and the orchid cut-flower industry

    No full text
    Plant Growth Regulation133231-239PGRE

    Partitioning of 14C assimilates between sources and sinks during different growth stages in the sympodial thin-leaved orchid Oncidium Goldiana

    No full text
    10.1086/297240International Journal of Plant Sciences1562188-196IPLS

    Pathway of phloem loading in the C3 tropical orchid hybrid Oncidium Goldiana

    No full text
    Journal of Experimental Botany473051935-1939JEBO

    Growth and photosynthesis of Oncidium 'Goldiana'

    No full text
    Journal of Horticultural Science695809-819JHSC
    corecore