Intravitreal Administration of Human Bone Marrow CD34+ Stem Cells in a Murine Model of Retinal Degeneration.

PurposeIntravitreal murine lineage-negative bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic cells slow down retinal degeneration. Because human BM CD34+ hematopoietic cells are not precisely comparable to murine cells, this study examined the effect of intravitreal human BM CD34+ cells on the degenerating retina using a murine model.MethodsC3H/HeJrd1/rd1 mice, immunosuppressed systemically with tacrolimus and rapamycin, were injected intravitreally with PBS (n = 16) or CD34+ cells (n = 16) isolated from human BM using a magnetic cell sorter and labeled with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). After 1 and 4 weeks, the injected eyes were imaged with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) and tested with electroretinography (ERG). Eyes were harvested after euthanasia for immunohistochemical and microarray analysis of the retina.ResultsIn vivo SLO fundus imaging visualized EGFP-labeled cells within the eyes following intravitreal injection. Simultaneous OCT analysis localized the EGFP-labeled cells on the retinal surface resulting in a saw-toothed appearance. Immunohistochemical analysis of the retina identified EGFP-labeled cells on the retinal surface and adjacent to ganglion cells. Electroretinography testing showed a flat signal both at 1 and 4 weeks following injection in all eyes. Microarray analysis of the retina following cell injection showed altered expression of more than 300 mouse genes, predominantly those regulating photoreceptor function and maintenance and apoptosis.ConclusionsIntravitreal human BM CD34+ cells rapidly home to the degenerating retinal surface. Although a functional benefit of this cell therapy was not seen on ERG in this rapidly progressive retinal degeneration model, molecular changes in the retina associated with CD34+ cell therapy suggest potential trophic regenerative effects that warrant further exploration

Chromatic Pupillometry as a Putative Screening Tool for Heritable Retinal Disease in Rhesus Macaques

PurposeNon-human primates (NHPs) are useful models for human retinal disease. Chromatic pupillometry has been proposed as a noninvasive method of identifying inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) in humans; however, standard protocols employ time-consuming dark adaptation. We utilized shortened and standard dark-adaptation protocols to compare pupillary light reflex characteristics following chromatic stimulation in rhesus macaques with achromatopsia to wild-type (WT) controls with normal retinal function.MethodsNine rhesus macaques homozygous for the p.R656Q mutation (PDE6C HOMs) and nine WT controls were evaluated using chromatic pupillometry following 1-minute versus standard 20-minute dark adaptations. The following outcomes were measured and compared between groups: pupil constriction latency, peak constriction, pupil constriction time, and constriction velocity.ResultsPupil constriction latency was significantly longer in PDE6C HOMs with red-light (P = 0.0002) and blue-light (P = 0.04) stimulation versus WT controls. Peak constriction was significantly less in PDE6C HOMs with all light stimulation compared to WT controls (P < 0.0001). Pupil constriction time was significantly shorter in PDE6C HOMs versus WT controls with red-light (P = 0.04) and white-light (P = 0.003) stimulation. Pupil constriction velocity was significantly slower in PDE6C HOMs versus WT controls with red-light (P < 0.0001), blue-light (P < 0.0001), and white-light (P = 0.0002) stimulation. Dark adaptation time only significantly affected peak (P = 0.008) and time of pupil constriction (P = 0.02) following blue-light stimulation.ConclusionsChromatic pupillometry following 1- and 20-minute dark adaptation is an effective tool for screening NHPs for achromatopsia.Translational relevanceRapid identification of NHPs with IRDs will provide animal research models to advance research and treatment of achromatopia in humans

A 500-year tale of co-evolution, adaptation, and virulence: Helicobacter pylori in the Americas

Helicobacter pylori is a common component of the human stomach microbiota, possibly dating back to the speciation of Homo sapiens. A history of pathogen evolution in allopatry has led to the development of genetically distinct H. pylori subpopulations, associated with different human populations, and more recent admixture among H. pylori subpopulations can provide information about human migrations. However, little is known about the degree to which some H. pylori genes are conserved in the face of admixture, potentially indicating host adaptation, or how virulence genes spread among different populations. We analyzed H. pylori genomes from 14 countries in the Americas, strains from the Iberian Peninsula, and public genomes from Europe, Africa, and Asia, to investigate how admixture varies across different regions and gene families. Whole-genome analyses of 723 H. pylori strains from around the world showed evidence of frequent admixture in the American strains with a complex mosaic of contributions from H. pylori populations originating in the Americas as well as other continents. Despite the complex admixture, distinctive genomic fingerprints were identified for each region, revealing novel American H. pylori subpopulations. A pan-genome Fst analysis showed that variation in virulence genes had the strongest fixation in America, compared with non-American populations, and that much of the variation constituted non-synonymous substitutions in functional domains. Network analyses suggest that these virulence genes have followed unique evolutionary paths in the American populations, spreading into different genetic backgrounds, potentially contributing to the high risk of gastric cancer in the region.Fil: Muñoz Ramirez, Zilia Y.. INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL (IPN);Fil: Pascoe, Ben. University of Bath; Reino UnidoFil: Mendez Tenorio, Alfonso. INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL (IPN);Fil: Mourkas, Evangelos. University of Bath; Reino UnidoFil: Sandoval Motta, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; MéxicoFil: Perez Perez, Guillermo. New York University Langone Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Morgan, Douglas R.. University of Alabama at Birmingahm; Estados UnidosFil: Dominguez, Ricardo Leonel. Western Honduras Gastric Cancer Prevention Initiative Hospital de Occidente Santa Rosa de Copan; HondurasFil: Ortiz Princz, Diana. No especifíca;Fil: Cavazza, Maria Eugenia. No especifíca;Fil: Rocha, Gifone. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Queiroz, Dulcienne. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; BrasilFil: Catalano, Mariana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Médica; ArgentinaFil: Zerbetto de Palma, Gerardo Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Química y Físico-Química Biológicas "Prof. Alejandro C. Paladini". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica. Instituto de Química y Físico-Química Biológicas; ArgentinaFil: Goldman, Cinthia Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica; ArgentinaFil: Venegas, Alejandro. Universidad Diego Portales; ChileFil: Alarcon, Teresa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Oleastro, Monica. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; PortugalFil: Vale, Filipa F.. Universidade Nova de Lisboa; PortugalFil: Goodman, Karen J.. University of Alberta; CanadáFil: Torres, Roberto C.. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; MéxicoFil: Berthenet, Elvire. Swansea University Medical School; Reino UnidoFil: Hitchings, Matthew D.. Swansea University Medical School; Reino UnidoFil: Blaser, Martin J.. Rutgers University; Estados UnidosFil: Sheppard, Samuel K.. University of Bath; Reino UnidoFil: Thorell, Kaisa. University of Gothenburg; SueciaFil: Torres, Javier. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; Méxic

A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Se trata de la publicación del estudio de fase 3 ASPEN que comparó en pacientes con macro-globulinemia de Waldenström (WM) la eficacia y la seguridad de ibrutinib, un inhibidor de la tirosi-na quinasa Bruton (BTK) de primera generación, familia que ha demostrado ser un tratamiento eficaz en estos pacientes, frente a zanubrutinib, un nuevo inhibidor de BTK de 2ª generación, altamente selectivo. Los pacientes con enfermedad MYD88L265P se asignaron al azar 1:1 al tratamiento con ibrutinib o zanubrutinib. El criterio principal de valoración fue la proporción de pa-cientes que lograron una respuesta completa (RC) o una respuesta parcial muy buena (RPMB) mediante una revisión independiente. Los criterios secundarios clave de valoración incluyeron la tasa de respuesta mayor (RM), la supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP), la duración de la res-puesta (DR), la carga de la enfermedad y la seguridad. Se randomizaron 201 pacientes y 199 recibieron al menos 1 dosis del tratamiento del estudio. Veintinueve (28%) pacientes tratados con zanubrutinib y 19 (19%) pacientes tratados con ibrutinib lograron una RPMB, diferencia que no alcanzó la significación estadística (P = 0,09). Las RM fueron del 77% y del 78%, respectivamen-te. No se alcanzó la mediana de DR y SLP, ya que el 84% y el 85% de los pacientes tratados con ibrutinib y zanubrutinib estaban libres de progresión a los 18 meses. La fibrilación auricular, hema-tomas, diarrea, edema periférico, hemorragia, espasmos musculares y neumonía, así como los eventos adversos que condujeron a interrumpir el tratamiento, fueron menos frecuentes entre los receptores de zanubrutinib. La incidencia de neutropenia fue mayor con zanubrutinib, aunque las tasas de infección de grado ≥3 fueron similares en ambos grupos (1,2 y 1,1 eventos por 100 me-ses-persona). Estos resultados demuestran que zanubrutinib e ibrutinib son altamente efectivos en el tratamiento de la WM, pero zanubrutinib se asoció con menor toxicidad y una tendencia hacia una mejor calidad de respuesta y menos toxicidad, particularmente toxicidad cardiovascular.[EN]Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity.BeiGene CoBeiGene C

A clinical and molecular characterisation of CRB1-associated maculopathy

To date, over 150 disease-associated variants in CRB1 have been described, resulting in a range of retinal disease phenotypes including Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa. Despite this, no genotype–phenotype correlations are currently recognised. We performed a retrospective review of electronic patient records to identify patients with macular dystrophy due to bi-allelic variants in CRB1. In total, seven unrelated individuals were identified. The median age at presentation was 21 years, with a median acuity of 0.55 decimalised Snellen units (IQR = 0.43). The follow-up period ranged from 0 to 19 years (median = 2.0 years), with a median final decimalised Snellen acuity of 0.65 (IQR = 0.70). Fundoscopy revealed only a subtly altered foveal reflex, which evolved into a bull’s-eye pattern of outer retinal atrophy. Optical coherence tomography identified structural changes—intraretinal cysts in the early stages of disease, and later outer retinal atrophy. Genetic testing revealed that one rare allele (c.498_506del, p.(Ile167_Gly169del)) was present in all patients, with one patient being homozygous for the variant and six being heterozygous. In trans with this, one variant recurred twice (p.(Cys896Ter)), while the four remaining alleles were each observed once (p.(Pro1381Thr), p.(Ser478ProfsTer24), p.(Cys195Phe) and p.(Arg764Cys)). These findings show that the rare CRB1 variant, c.498_506del, is strongly associated with localised retinal dysfunction. The clinical findings are much milder than those observed with bi-allelic, loss-of-function variants in CRB1, suggesting this in-frame deletion acts as a hypomorphic allele. This is the most prevalent disease-causing CRB1 variant identified in the non-Asian population to date

Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Symptomatic Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III ASPEN Study

The phase III ASPEN study demonstrated the comparable efficacy and improved safety of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we report long-term follow-up outcomes from ASPEN. The primary end point was the sum of very good partial response (VGPR) + complete response (CR) rates; secondary and exploratory end points were also reported. Cohort 1 comprised 201 patients (myeloid differentiation primary response 88-mutant WM: 102 receiving zanubrutinib; 99 receiving ibrutinib); cohort 2 comprised 28 patients (myeloid differentiation primary response 88 wild-type WM: 28 zanubrutinib; 26 efficacy evaluable). At 44.4-month median follow-up, VGPR + CR rates were 36.3% with zanubrutinib versus 25.3% with ibrutinib in cohort 1 and 30.8% with one CR in cohort 2. In patients with CXC motif chemokine receptor 4 mutation, VGPR + CR rates were 21.2% with zanubrutinib versus 10.0% with ibrutinib (cohort 1). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. Any-grade adverse events (AEs) of diarrhea (34.7% v 22.8%), muscle spasms (28.6% v 11.9%), hypertension (25.5% v 14.9%), atrial fibrillation/flutter (23.5% v 7.9%), and pneumonia (18.4% v 5.0%) were more common with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib; neutropenia (20.4% v 34.7%) was less common with ibrutinib versus zanubrutinib (cohort 1). Zanubrutinib was associated with lower risk of AE-related treatment discontinuation. Overall, these findings confirm the long-term response quality and tolerability associated with zanubrutinib

Long-term outcomes of the global tuberculosis and COVID-19 co-infection cohort

Background: Longitudinal cohort data of patients with tuberculosis (TB) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are lacking. In our global study, we describe long-term outcomes of patients affected by TB and COVID-19. Methods: We collected data from 174 centres in 31 countries on all patients affected by COVID-19 and TB between 1 March 2020 and 30 September 2022. Patients were followed-up until cure, death or end of cohort time. All patients had TB and COVID-19; for analysis purposes, deaths were attributed to TB, COVID-19 or both. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional risk-regression models, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival and mortality attributed to TB, COVID-19 or both. Results: Overall, 788 patients with COVID-19 and TB (active or sequelae) were recruited from 31 countries, and 10.8% (n=85) died during the observation period. Survival was significantly lower among patients whose death was attributed to TB and COVID-19 versus those dying because of either TB or COVID-19 alone (p<0.001). Significant adjusted risk factors for TB mortality were higher age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07), HIV infection (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.02-5.16) and invasive ventilation (HR 4.28, 95% CI 2.34-7.83). For COVID-19 mortality, the adjusted risks were higher age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04), male sex (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.24-3.91), oxygen requirement (HR 7.93, 95% CI 3.44-18.26) and invasive ventilation (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.36-3.53). Conclusions: In our global cohort, death was the outcome in >10% of patients with TB and COVID-19. A range of demographic and clinical predictors are associated with adverse outcomes

Biomarker analysis of the ASPEN study comparing zanubrutinib with ibrutinib for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia

The phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) compared Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Post-hoc biomarker analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing on pretreatment bone marrow samples from 98 patients treated with zanubrutinib and 92 patients treated with ibrutinib with mutated (MUT) MYD88 and 20 patients with wild-type (WT) MYD88 treated with zanubrutinib. Of 329 mutations in 52 genes, mutations in CXCR4 (25.7%), TP53 (24.8%), ARID1A (15.7%), and TERT (9.0%) were most common. TP53MUT, ARID1AMUT, and TERTMUTwere associated with higher rates of CXCR4MUT(P < .05). Patients with CXCR4MUT(frameshift or nonsense [NS] mutations) had lower very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response rates (CR; 17.0% vs 37.2%, P = .020) and longer time to response (11.1 vs 8.4 months) than patients with CXCR4WTtreated with BTKis. CXCR4NSwas associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.39; P = .017) in patients treated with ibrutinib but not in those treated with zanubrutinib (HR, 0.67; P = .598), but VGPR + CR rates were similar between treatment groups (14.3% vs 15.4%). Compared with ibrutinib, patients with CXCR4NStreated with zanubrutinib had a favorable major response rate (MRR; 85.7% vs 53.8%; P = .09) and PFS (HR, 0.30; P = .093). In patients with TP53MUT, significantly lower MRRs were observed for patients treated with ibrutinib (63.6% vs 85.7%; P = .04) but not for those treated with zanubrutinib (80.8% vs 81.9%; P = .978). In TP53MUT, compared with ibrutinib, patients treated with zanubrutinib had higher VGPR and CR (34.6% vs 13.6%; P < .05), numerically improved MRR (80.8% vs 63.6%; P = .11), and longer PFS (not reached vs 44.2 months; HR, 0.66; P = .37). Collectively, patients with WM with CXCR4MUTor TP53MUThad worse prognosis compared with patients with WT alleles, and zanubrutinib led to better clinical outcomes

Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol

High blood cholesterol is typically considered a feature of wealthy western countries(1,2). However, dietary and behavioural determinants of blood cholesterol are changing rapidly throughout the world(3) and countries are using lipid-lowering medications at varying rates. These changes can have distinct effects on the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol, which have different effects on human health(4,5). However, the trends of HDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels over time have not been previously reported in a global analysis. Here we pooled 1,127 population-based studies that measured blood lipids in 102.6 million individuals aged 18 years and older to estimate trends from 1980 to 2018 in mean total, non-HDL and HDL cholesterol levels for 200 countries. Globally, there was little change in total or non-HDL cholesterol from 1980 to 2018. This was a net effect of increases in low- and middle-income countries, especially in east and southeast Asia, and decreases in high-income western countries, especially those in northwestern Europe, and in central and eastern Europe. As a result, countries with the highest level of non-HDL cholesterol-which is a marker of cardiovascular riskchanged from those in western Europe such as Belgium, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and Malta in 1980 to those in Asia and the Pacific, such as Tokelau, Malaysia, The Philippines and Thailand. In 2017, high non-HDL cholesterol was responsible for an estimated 3.9 million (95% credible interval 3.7 million-4.2 million) worldwide deaths, half of which occurred in east, southeast and south Asia. The global repositioning of lipid-related risk, with non-optimal cholesterol shifting from a distinct feature of high-income countries in northwestern Europe, north America and Australasia to one that affects countries in east and southeast Asia and Oceania should motivate the use of population-based policies and personal interventions to improve nutrition and enhance access to treatment throughout the world.Peer reviewe