Selección De Personal Para El Banco Del Llano S.A

N/AEl proyecto se centra en mejorar la selección de personal en el Banco del Llano S.A., un banco en Colombia orientado hacia la atención al cliente y la expansión nacional. Enfrenta desafíos en el mercado laboral, como la brecha de habilidades y la diversidad cultural. Se inicia con una introducción sobre la importancia de la selección de personal en un entorno competitivo, abordando sesgos y discriminación respaldados por investigaciones. Se justifica el proyecto citando expertos en recursos humanos, enfatizando la relevancia estratégica de mejorar los procesos de selección. Se busca identificar fortalezas y debilidades en el proceso de selección del banco, con el argumento de que una selección efectiva no solo beneficia comercialmente a la entidad, sino que también tiene un impacto social positivo mediante la generación de empleo y el fortalecimiento organizativo. Los objetivos incluyen optimizar el proceso de selección con un modelo eficaz que promueva la diversidad, utilizar pruebas y evaluaciones para identificar candidatos adecuados, y explorar la evolución de la gestión humana, enfocándose en el talento como ventaja competitiva. Se mencionan detalles legales que respaldan el proceso de selección, como la Ley de Protección de Datos Personales y leyes que garantizan la igualdad de oportunidades y la protección contra la discriminación. La metodología de investigación es mixta, combinando enfoques cualitativos y cuantitativos, y se describe la población objetivo, el tamaño de la muestra y las técnicas de análisis de datos. Los resultados resaltan la necesidad de innovación, especialmente la incorporación de inteligencia artificial para reducir sesgos. Se hacen recomendaciones, como adoptar tecnologías emergentes, desarrollar programas de formación innovadores y estrategias para la diversidad e inclusión, y monitorear las tendencias laborales.The project focuses on improving staff selection at Banco del Llano S.A., a bank in Colombia oriented towards customer service and national expansion. It faces challenges in the labour market, such as skills gap and cultural diversity. It begins with an introduction on the importance of staff selection in a competitive environment, addressing biases and discrimination supported by research. The project is justified by quoting human resources experts, emphasizing the strategic relevance of improving selection processes. It seeks to identify strengths and weaknesses in the selection process of the bank, arguing that an effective selection not only benefits the entity commercially, but also has a positive social impact through employment generation and organizational strengthening. Objectives include optimizing the selection process with an effective model that promotes diversity, using tests and evaluations to identify suitable candidates, and exploring the evolution of human management, focusing on talent as a competitive advantage. Legal details supporting the selection process are mentioned, such as the Personal Data Protection Act and laws guaranteeing equal opportunities and protection against discrimination. The research methodology is mixed, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, and describes the target population, sample size and data analysis techniques. The results highlight the need for innovation, especially the incorporation of artificial intelligence to reduce biases. Recommendations are made, such as adopting emerging technologies, developing innovative training programs and strategies for diversity and inclusion, and monitoring work trends

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation and History of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from GARFIELD-AF

BACKGROUND: Many patients with atrial fibrillation have concomitant coronary artery disease with or without acute coronary syndromes and are in need of additional antithrombotic therapy. There are few data on the long-term clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome. This is a 2-year study of atrial fibrillation patients with or without a history of acute coronary syndromes

Delayed colorectal cancer care during covid-19 pandemic (decor-19). Global perspective from an international survey

Background The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer (CRC) care during the pandemic. Methods The impact of COVID-19 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of CRC patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in CRC care. Respondents were divided into two comparator groups: 1) ‘delay’ group: CRC care affected by the pandemic; 2) ‘no delay’ group: unaltered CRC practice. Results A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the ‘delay’ (745, 70.9%) and ‘no delay’ (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to COVID-19 units, units fully dedicated to COVID-19 care, personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the ‘delay’ group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of CRC care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in COVID-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to COVID-19 units were statistically associated with unaltered CRC care in the ‘no delay’ group, while the geographical distribution was not. Conclusions Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic CRC practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health-care delivery systems, hospital’s preparedness, resources availability, and local COVID-19 prevalence rather than geographical factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize CRC care

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field