3 research outputs found
The Effects of Interpersonal and Noninterpersonal Loss on Music Preference
Through a series of studies, Lee, Andrade, and Palmer (2013) predicted and found that sadness caused by an interpersonal loss creates greater preference for listening to mood-congruent music than sadness caused by a noninterpersonal loss. However, in their experimental procedures, they inadvertently confounded the intensity of the sadness induced in the noninterpersonal and interpersonal sadness conditions, such that the interpersonal sadness condition created stronger feelings of sadness. The current study sought to replicate Lee et al.’s (2013) findings with the modification of unconfounding the intensity of sadness in the interpersonal and noninterpersonal conditions. After controlling for intensity, this study found no significant difference between the interpersonal and noninterpersonal sadness conditions in their preference for mood-congruent music. However, in support of Lee et al. (2013) findings, this study did find that the interpersonal sadness group was more likely to choose sad songs than the neutral group. This result was not found for the noninterpersonal sadness group. In effect, this could indicate an overall preference for mood-congruent music when sadness is caused by an interpersonal loss
American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death).
The purpose this document is to update and combine the previously
published recommendations into one source approved by
the major cardiology organizations in the United States and
Europe. We have consciously attempted to create a streamlined
document, not a textbook, that would be useful
specifically to locate recommendations on the evaluation
and treatment of patients who have or may be at risk for
ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, sections on epidemiology,
mechanisms and substrates, and clinical presentations are
brief, because there are no recommendations for those
sections. For the other sections, the wording has been kept
to a minimum, and clinical presentations have been confined
to those aspects relevant to forming recommendations