Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely highpowered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.UCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Sociales::Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIP

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world

Analysis of the RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase 1 (RDR1) Gene Family in Melon

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 (RDR1) plays a crucial defense role against plant viruses by secondary amplification of viral double-stranded RNA in the gene-silencing pathway. In this study, it was found that melon (Cucumis melo) encodes four RDR1 genes (CmRDR1a, b, c1 and c2) similar to the CsRDR1 gene family of cucumber (C. sativus). However, in contrast to cucumber, melon harbors a truncated CmRDR1b gene. In healthy plants, CmRDR1a was expressed, whereas the expression of CmRDR1c1/c2 was not detected. CmRDR1a expression level increased 20-fold upon cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection and was not increased in melon plants infected with zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), cucumber vein yellowing virus (CVYV) and cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV). The expression of CmRDR1c1/c2 genes was induced differentially by infection with viruses from different families: high levels of ~340-, 172- and 115-fold increases were induced by CMV, CVYV and CGMMV, respectively, and relatively low-level increases by potyvirus infection (4- to 6-fold). CMV mutants lacking the viral silencing suppressor 2b protein did not cause increased CmRDR1c/c2 expression; knockout of CmRDR1c1/c2 by CRISPR/Cas9 increased susceptibility to CMV but not to ZYMV. Therefore, it is suggested that the sensitivity of melon to viruses from different families is a result of the loss of function of CmRDR1b