9 research outputs found

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    Oncofertilité et cancer du sein au CHRU de Montpellier : analyse rétrospective du devenir des patientes depuis 2011

    No full text
    International audienceObjective: Five to 7% of breast cancers affect women under 40 years old. The survival of these patients has been improved thanks to therapeutic advances, often to the detriment of their fertility. The objective of this study is to evaluate the activity of oncofertility and the future of young women with breast cancer managed at the Montpellier University Hospital.Methods: This is a retrospective study including women aged from 18 to 43 years-old diagnosed with breast cancer and referred in oncofertility consultation at the Montpellier University Hospital between July 2011 and December 2018.Results: 190 patients were eligible, three refused to participate to the study, hence 187 patients were included. We estimate that only 33% of young breast cancer patients potentially eligible for fertility preservation (FP) benefited from an oncofertility consultation in our region. Of these 187 patients, 58 (31%) underwent ovarian stimulation for oocyte or embryo vitrification. They were significantly younger: 32.9 vs 34.6 years old (P=0.01) and had fewer invaded lymph nodes. A total of 66 cycles were achieved and 11.4 oocytes or 3 embryos were vitrified per patient. The reuse rate was 3.6% with 91% of post cancer pregnancies being spontaneous.Conclusion: The oncofertility care network seems effective at the regional level. Enhancing health professionals' awareness and creating a regional register could improve our long-term follow-up

    Dichorio-Triamniotic Triplet Pregnancy after Day 3 Single Embryo Transfer

    No full text
    International audienceA 31 year-old woman had a single embryo transfer on day 3 after assisted hatching (AH) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Ultrasound examination performed 6 weeks after oocyte retrieval revealed a triplet pregnancy combining monochorionic diamniotic twins and a singleton. If zygote splitting resulting in monochorionic triamniotic triplets following IVF has already been described, this case is about an incredibly rare phenomenon after single embryo transfer. Naturally, a concurrent spontaneous conception cannot be excluded. To our knowledge, this is the first time a dichorionic triplet pregnancy after single embryo transfer is reported

    Programme de préservation de la fertilité féminine au CHRU de Montpellier 2ans après

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVE:Female fertility preservation in the context of cancer management is crucial for patient's health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncofertility practice at our university hospital of Montpellier since 2011.PATIENTS AND METHODS:The evaluation of management of young patients referred to Montpellier University Hospital from September 2011 to September 2013 for oncofertility counselling before cancer treatment.RESULTS:Seventy-one patients were referred to a specialized oncofertility center. Forty-two patients (59.1%) were included in the oncofertility program. Twenty-two patients (31%) were proposed for oocyte vitrification after COS protocol, eight patients (11.3%) for ovarian tissue cryoconservation, seven patients (9.9%) for GnRH injections, three patients (4.2%) ovarian transposition and two patients (2.8%) for embryo cryopreservation. Among the 42 indications of fertility preservation, only 18 will have finally taken place.CONCLUSION:Oncofertility counselling for young patients should now be part of the cancer management. It involves multidisciplinary teams. Further information of both oncologists and patients is needed to improve this new approach in the field of cancer treatments

    Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    No full text
    No abstract available

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).

    No full text

    Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    No full text
    non present

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    No full text
    corecore