Thrifty Phenotype vs Cold Adaptation: Trade-offs in Upper Limb Proportions of Himalayan Populations of Nepal

The multi-stress environment of high altitude has been associated with growth deficits in humans, particularly in zeugopod elements (forearm, lower leg). This is consistent with the thrifty phenotype hypothesis, which has been observed in Andeans, but has yet to be tested in other high altitude populations. In Himalayan populations, other factors, such as cold stress, may shape limb proportions. The current study investigated whether relative upper limb proportions of Himalayan adults (n=254) differ between highland and lowland populations, and whether cold adaptation or a thrifty phenotype mechanism may be acting here. Height, weight, humerus length, ulna length, hand length, and hand width were measured using standard methods. Relative to height, total upper limb and ulna lengths were significantly shorter in highlanders compared to lowlanders in both sexes, whilst hand and humerus length were not. Hand width did not significantly differ between populations. These results support the thrifty phenotype hypothesis, as hand and humerus proportions are conserved at the expense of the ulna. The reduction in relative ulna length could be attributed to cold adaptation, but the lack of difference between populations in both hand length and width indicate that cold adaptation is not shaping hands proportions in this case

Heat Acclimation

Physical exercise under heat stress can impair performance through multiple physiological mechanisms including cardiovascular, central nervous system, and skeletal muscle metabolism factors. However, repeated heat exposure that increases whole-body temperature, stimulates profuse sweating, and stresses the cardiovascular system, leads to increases in blood volume, decreases in core and skin temperatures, and induces important molecular adaptations that stimulate physiological heat acclimation. These integrated physiological adaptations act to improve exercise capacity in the heat, as well as minimise the risk of exertional heat illness. Most physiological benefits are noticeable within a few days of daily heat exposure, but the full benefits take about 2 weeks or longer to improve exercise capacity in the heat