661 research outputs found

    A Novel System for AYUSH Healthcare Services using Classification and Regression

    Get PDF
    There are roughly 4000 AYUSH hospitals spread out across India under various councils and hospitals run by the Indian government. Today’s atmosphere makes it more challenging than ever to locate a suitable AYUSH facility for the treatment. The AYUSH Ministry provides India’s top option for healthcare delivery. The government is examining strategies to lower expenditures while enhancing patient care. We are proposing the ground-breaking idea of e-healthcare which involves various novel features like suggesting various tools to the patients those need to communicate with the healthcare professionals as per their convenience remotely. This research suggests an interactive system using Android in line with this trend. By integrating different bio-medical data sources that contain information pertinent to the hospital demographics, their inpatient procedure rates, Outpatient department, etc., we proposed a system that surveys on the various AYUSH hospitals to find. This system uses the Google Map API for tracking and highlighting the location to the nearby AYUSH hospitals with opening and closing timings. Additionally, the proposed system plays a crucial role in emergency scenarios by supporting the user in performing the necessary first aid techniques. Using this strategy, the entire system demonstrates that this research provides a superior method for making decisions than past studies

    Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Volume 5 Issue 1 pages 1-138

    Get PDF

    āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ­āļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒ: āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļšāļšāļšāļđāļĢāļ“āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļš Avatar-based Technology Interventions in Patient Education: A Systematic Integrative Review

    Get PDF
    āļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­ āļ§āļąāļ•āļ–āļļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ„āđŒ: āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ™āļ§āļąāļ•āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļēāļĢ āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļāļąāļšāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒ āļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē: āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļšāļšāļšāļđāļĢāļ“āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđāļšāļšāļĄāļĩāļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļšāļ„āļļāļĄ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļ·āļšāļ„āđ‰āļ™āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļ™āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ­āļīāđ€āļĨāļ„āļ—āļĢāļ­āļ™āļīāļāļŠāđŒ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane  āđāļĨāļ° EMBASE  āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ„āļļāļ“āļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļ°āđ€āļšāļĩāļĒāļšāļ§āļīāļ˜āļĩāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļ  āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē: āļĄāļĩāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™ 6 āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļĢāļ‡āļ•āļēāļĄāđ€āļāļ“āļ‘āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļ„āļąāļ”āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļē āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒ āđāļ•āđˆāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļĒāļąāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļēāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļžāļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļœāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļšāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒ āļŠāļĢāļļāļ›: āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļžāļšāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļ™āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒ āļžāļšāļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļ•āđŒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļĢāļđāļ›āđāļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļļāļ‚āļ āļēāļžāđāļāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļžāļĒāļēāļšāļēāļĨāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ•āđˆāļ­āđ„āļ› āļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļšāļ—āļ§āļ™āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļšāļšāļšāļđāļĢāļ“āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļš, āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļˆāļģāļĨāļ­āļ‡āļ•āļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļ„āļĢ, āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļžāļĒāļēāļšāļēāļĨāđƒāļ™āļ„āļĨāļīāļ™āļīāļ, āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļāđˆāļœāļđāđ‰āļ›āđˆāļ§āļĒ  Abstract Objective: To review the evidence for the avatar-based technology as an innovative and emerging intervention for delivery of health education in clinical practice. Method: This review followed a systematic review methodology. Randomised controlled trials in English language were searched in CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE. Articles were assessed for quality of methodology. Results: Six randomised controlled trials met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Avatar-based technology interventions improved health knowledge, and health-relate behaviour. There was insufficient evidence to suggest the effectiveness of Avatar-based interventions on, self-efficacy, and of the interventions among the participants were unclear. Conclusion: This review established a scientific basis for avatar-based technology as an effective intervention for the transfer of knowledge and skill development for patients. Avatar-based education tools have a clear advantage over paper-based education materials. This review provides nurses with the state of science in relation for the avatar-based technology interventions in patient education. A summary of intervention components are provided to assist nurses to develop and use the avatar-based interventions in clinical practice. Keywords: systematic integrative review, avatar-based technology,             nursing practice, patient educatio

    Usability analysis of contending electronic health record systems

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we report measured usability of two leading EHR systems during procurement. A total of 18 users participated in paired-usability testing of three scenarios: ordering and managing medications by an outpatient physician, medicine administration by an inpatient nurse and scheduling of appointments by nursing staff. Data for audio, screen capture, satisfaction rating, task success and errors made was collected during testing. We found a clear difference between the systems for percentage of successfully completed tasks, two different satisfaction measures and perceived learnability when looking at the results over all scenarios. We conclude that usability should be evaluated during procurement and the difference in usability between systems could be revealed even with fewer measures than were used in our study. ÂĐ 2019 American Psychological Association Inc. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe

    Transactions of 2019 International Conference on Health Information Technology Advancement Vol. 4 No. 1

    Get PDF
    The Fourth International Conference on Health Information Technology Advancement Kalamazoo, Michigan, October 31 - Nov. 1, 2019. Conference Co-Chairs Bernard T. Han and Muhammad Razi, Department of Business Information Systems, Haworth College of Business, Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Transaction Editor Dr. Huei Lee, Professor, Department of Computer Information Systems, Eastern Michigan University Ypsilanti, MI 48197 Volume 4, No. 1 Hosted by The Center for Health Information Technology Advancement, WM

    The Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Volume 7 Issue 1, Pages 1-120

    Get PDF

    Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions

    Get PDF
    Background Automated telephone communication systems (ATCS) can deliver voice messages and collect health-related information from patients using either their telephone’s touch-tone keypad or voice recognition software. ATCS can supplement or replace telephone contact between health professionals and patients. There are four different types of ATCS: unidirectional (one-way, non-interactive voice communication), interactive voice response (IVR) systems, ATCS with additional functions such as access to an expert to request advice (ATCS Plus) and multimodal ATCS, where the calls are delivered as part of a multicomponent intervention. Objectives To assess the effects of ATCS for preventing disease and managing long-term conditions on behavioural change, clinical, process, cognitive, patient-centred and adverse outcomes. Search methods We searched 10 electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Global Health; WHOLIS; LILACS; Web of Science; and ASSIA); three grey literature sources (Dissertation Abstracts, Index to Theses, Australasian Digital Theses); and two trial registries (www.controlled-trials.com; www.clinicaltrials.gov) for papers published between 1980 and June 2015. Selection criteria Randomised, cluster- and quasi-randomised trials, interrupted time series and controlled before-and-after studies comparing ATCS interventions, with any control or another ATCS type were eligible for inclusion. Studies in all settings, for all consumers/carers, in any preventive healthcare or long term condition management role were eligible. Data collection and analysis We used standard Cochrane methods to select and extract data and to appraise eligible studies. Main results We included 132 trials (N = 4,669,689). Studies spanned across several clinical areas, assessing many comparisons based on evaluation of different ATCS types and variable comparison groups. Forty-one studies evaluated ATCS for delivering preventive healthcare, 84 for managing long-term conditions, and seven studies for appointment reminders. We downgraded our certainty in the evidence primarily because of the risk of bias for many outcomes. We judged the risk of bias arising from allocation processes to be low for just over half the studies and unclear for the remainder. We considered most studies to be at unclear risk of performance or detection bias due to blinding, while only 16% of studies were at low risk. We generally judged the risk of bias due to missing data and selective outcome reporting to be unclear. For preventive healthcare, ATCS (ATCS Plus, IVR, unidirectional) probably increase immunisation uptake in children (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.32; 5 studies, N = 10,454; moderate certainty) and to a lesser extent in adolescents (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11; 2 studies, N = 5725; moderate certainty). The effects of ATCS in adults are unclear (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.53 to 9.02; 2 studies, N = 1743; very low certainty). For screening, multimodal ATCS increase uptake of screening for breast cancer (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.04; 2 studies, N = 462; high certainty) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.88 to 2.55; 3 studies, N = 1013; high certainty) versus usual care. It may also increase osteoporosis screening. ATCS Plus interventions probably slightly increase cervical cancer screening (moderate certainty), but effects on osteoporosis screening are uncertain. IVR systems probably increase CRC screening at 6 months (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.48; 2 studies, N = 16,915; moderate certainty) but not at 9 to 12 months, with probably little or no effect of IVR (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99, 1.11; 2 studies, 2599 participants; moderate certainty) or unidirectional ATCS on breast cancer screening. Appointment reminders delivered through IVR or unidirectional ATCS may improve attendance rates compared with no calls (low certainty). For long-term management, medication or laboratory test adherence provided the most general evidence across conditions (25 studies, data not combined). Multimodal ATCS versus usual care showed conflicting effects (positive and uncertain) on medication adherence. ATCS Plus probably slightly (versus control; moderate certainty) or probably (versus usual care; moderate certainty) improves medication adherence but may have little effect on adherence to tests (versus control). IVR probably slightly improves medication adherence versus control (moderate certainty). Compared with usual care, IVR probably improves test adherence and slightly increases medication adherence up to six months but has little or no effect at longer time points (moderate certainty). Unidirectional ATCS, compared with control, may have little effect or slightly improve medication adherence (low certainty). The evidence suggested little or no consistent effect of any ATCS type on clinical outcomes (blood pressure control, blood lipids, asthma control, therapeutic coverage) related to adherence, but only a small number of studies contributed clinical outcome data. The above results focus on areas with the most general findings across conditions. In condition-specific areas, the effects of ATCS varied, including by the type of ATCS intervention in use. Multimodal ATCS probably decrease both cancer pain and chronic pain as well as depression (moderate certainty), but other ATCS types were less effective. Depending on the type of intervention, ATCS may have small effects on outcomes for physical activity, weight management, alcohol consumption, and diabetes mellitus. ATCS have little or no effect on outcomes related to heart failure, hypertension, mental health or smoking cessation, and there is insufficient evidence to determine their effects for preventing alcohol/ substance misuse or managing illicit drug addiction, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS, hypercholesterolaemia, obstructive sleep apnoea, spinal cord dysfunction or psychological stress in carers. Only four trials (3%) reported adverse events, and it was unclear whether these were related to the intervention
    • â€Ķ
    corecore