232 research outputs found
Stop Making Sense(s) : Some late medieval and very late medieval views on faculty psychology
Peer reviewe
Aristotle's Peculiarly Human Psychology
For Aristotle, human cognition has a lot in common both with non-human
animal cognition and with divine cognition. With non-human animals, humans
share a non-rational part of the soul and non-rational cognitive faculties
(DA 427b6–14, NE 1102b29 and EE 1219b24–6). With gods, humans share
a rational part of the soul and rational cognitive faculties (NE 1177b17–
1178a8). The rational part and the non-rational part of the soul, however,
coexist and cooperate only in human souls (NE 1102b26–9, EE 1219b28–31).
In this chapter, I show that a study of this cooperation helps to uncover some
distinctive aspects of human cognition and desire
The Many Virtues of Second Nature : Habitus in Latin Medieval Philosophy
This chapter consists of a systematic introduction to the nature and function of habitus in Latin medieval philosophy. Over the course of this introduction, several topics are treated: the theoretical necessity to posit habitus; their nature; their causal contribution to the production of internal and external acts; how and why habitus can grow and decay; what makes their unity when they can have multiple objects and work in clusters. Finally we examine two specific questions: why intellectual habitus represent a special case that triggered considerable debate; how human beings can be said to be free if their actions are determined by moral habitus
The dispositionalist deity: how God creates laws and why theists should care
How does God govern the world? For many theists “laws of nature” play a vital role. But what are these laws, metaphysically speaking? I shall argue that laws of nature are not external to the objects they govern, but instead should be thought of as reducible to internal features of properties. Recent work in metaphysics and philosophy of science has revived a dispositionalist conception of nature, according to which nature is not passive, but active and dynamic. Disposition theorists see particulars as being internally powerful rather than being governed by external laws of nature, making external laws in effect ontologically otiose. I will argue that theists should prefer a dispositionalist ontology, since it leads them toward the theory of concurrentism in divine conservation, rather than occasionalism, and revives the distinction between internal and external teleology. God on this view does not govern the world through external laws of nature, but rather through internal aspects of powerful properties
A Politico-Communal Reading of the Rose
Lettura del Fiore in rapporto alle fonti retoriche e politiche di ambiente comunal
- …