Long‐Term Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Apical Versus Nonapical Left Ventricular Pacing

Background Experimental evidence indicates that left ventricular (LV) apical pacing is hemodynamically superior to nonapical LV pacing. Some studies have shown that an LV apical lead position is unfavorable in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to determine whether an apical LV lead position influences cardiac mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Methods and Results In this retrospective observational study, the primary end point of cardiac mortality was assessed in relation to longitudinal (basal, midventricular, or apical) and circumferential (anterior, lateral, or posterior) LV lead positions, as well as right ventricular (apical or septal), assigned using fluoroscopy. Lead positions were assessed in 1189 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation over 15 years. After a median follow‐up of 6.0 years (interquartile range: 4.4–7.7 years), an apical LV lead position was associated with lower cardiac mortality than a nonapical position (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.99) after covariate adjustment. There were no differences in total mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Death from pump failure was lower with apical than nonapical positions (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.94). Compared with a basal position, an apical LV position was also associated with lower risk of sudden cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.93). No differences emerged between circumferential LV lead positions or right ventricular positions with respect to any end point. Conclusions In recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy, an apical LV lead position was associated with better long‐term cardiac survival than a nonapical position. This effect was due to a lower risk of pump failure and sudden cardiac death

Left ventricular lead position, mechanical activation, and myocardial scar in relation to left ventricular reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A feature-tracking and contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

BACKGROUND Late mechanical activation (LMA) and viability in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium have been proposed as targets for LV pacing during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether an LV lead position over segments with LMA and no scar improves LV reverse remodeling (LVRR) and clinical outcomes after CRT. METHODS Feature-tracking and late gadolinium enhancement images were analyzed retrospectively in patients with heart failure (HF) (n = 89; mean age 66.8 ± 10.8 years; LV ejection fraction = 23.1% ± 9.9%) who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scanning before CRT implantation. Lead positions were classified as concordant (no scar and LMA [time to peak systolic circumferential strain]) or nonconcordant (scar and/or no LMA). RESULTS LVRR occurred in 68% and 24% of patients with concordant and nonconcordant LV lead positions, respectively (P < .001). Over a median of 4.4 years (range 0.1-8.7 years), LV lead concordance predicted cardiac mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.62) and cardiac mortality or HF hospitalizations (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.58). "No scar" in the paced segment predicted cardiac mortality (aOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.52) and cardiac mortality or HF hospitalizations (adjusted aOR 0.24; 95% CI 0.12-0.49). CONCLUSION LV lead deployment over nonscarred LMA segments was associated with better LVRR and clinical outcomes after CRT. LVRR was primarily related to LMA, whereas events were primarily related to scar. These findings support the use of late gadolinium enhancement CMR and feature-tracking CMR in guiding LV lead deployment