Best practices, errors and perspectives of half a century of plant translocation in Italy

: Conservation translocations are becoming common conservation practice, so there is an increasing need of understanding the drivers of plant translocation performance through reviews of cases at global and regional levels. The establishment of the Italian Database of Plant Translocation (IDPlanT) provides the opportunity to review the techniques used in 186 plant translocation cases performed in the last fifty years in the heart of the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot. In this study, we describe techniques and information available in IDPlantT and use these data to identify drivers of translocation outcomes. To this end, we tested the effect of 15 variables on survival translocated propagules at the last monitoring date, using binomial logistic Mixed Effect Models. The analysis revealed that 11 variables significantly affected survival of transplants, namely: life form, site protection, material source, number of source populations, propagation methods, propagule life stage, planting methods, habitat suitability assessment, site preparation, aftercare and costs. Plant translocations in Italy and in the Mediterranean area should consider the complexity of speciation, gene flow and plant migrations that has led to local adaptations with important implications on the choice and constitution of source material. The integration of vegetation studies for the selection of suitable planting sites can significantly increase the success of translocation efforts. Whilst post-translocation watering has a general positive effects on traslocation outcome, other aftercare techniques do not always increase transplant survival. Finally, we found that how funds are spent appears to be more important than their actual amount. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

IDPlanT: the Italian database of plant translocation

IDPlanT is the Italian Database of Plant Translocation, an initiative of the Nature Conservation Working Group of the Italian Botanical Society. IDPlanT currently includes 185 plant translocations.The establishment of a national database on plant translocation is a key step forward in data sharing and techniques improvement in this field of plant conservatio

Safety and efficacy of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir plus ribavirin in patients over 65 years with HCV genotype 1 cirrhosis

none191norestrictedAscione, Antonio*; De Luca, Massimo; Melazzini, Mario; Montilla, Simona; Trotta, Maria Paola; Petta, Salvatore; Puoti, Massimo; Sangiovanni, Vincenzo; Messina, Vincenzo; Bruno, Savino; Izzi, Antonio; Villa, Erica; Aghemo, Alessio; Zignego, Anna Linda; Orlandini, Alessandra; Fontanella, Luca; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Marzioni, Marco; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Craxì, Antonio; Abbati, Giuseppe; Alberti, Alfredo; Andreone, Pietro; Andreoni, Massimo; Angeli, Paolo; Angelico, Mario; Angarano, Gioacchino; Angrisani, Debora; Antinori, Andrea; Antonini, Cinzia; Avancini, Ivo; Barone, Michele; Bruno, Raffaele; Benedetti, Antonio; Bernabucci, Veronica; Blanc, Pier; Boarini, Chiara; Boffa, Nicola; Boglione, Lucio; Borghi, Vanni; Borgia, Guglielmo; Brancaccio, Giuseppina; Brunetto, Maurizia; Cacciola, Irene; Calabrese, Paolo; Calvaruso, Vincenza; Campagnolo, Davide; Canovari, Benedetta; Caporaso, Nicola; Capra, Franco; Carolo, Giada; Cassola, Giovanni; Castelli, Francesco; Cauda, Roberto; Silberstein, Francesca Ceccherini; Cecere, Roberto; Chessa, Luchino; Chiodera, Alessandro; Chirianni, Antonio; Ciancio, Alessia; Cima, Serena; Coco, Barbara; Colombo, Massimo; Coppola, Nicola; Corti, Giampaolo; Cosco, Lucio; Corradori, Silvia; Cozzolongo, Raffaele; Cristaudo, Antonio; Danieli, Elena; Monforte, Antonella D’Arminio; Monache, Marco delle; Del Poggio, Paolo; de Luca, Andrea; Dentone, Chiara; Di Biagio, Antonio; Di Leo, Alfredo; Di Perri, Giovanni; Di Stefano, Marco; D’Offizi, Giampiero; Donato, Francesca; Durante, Emanuele; Erne, Elke; Fagiuoli, Stefano; Falasca, Katia; Federico, Alessandro; Felder, Martina; Ferrari, Carlo; Gaeta, Giovanni Battista; Ganga, Roberto; Gatti, Pietro; Giacomet, Vania; Giacometti, Andrea; Gianstefani, Alice; Giordani, Maria; Giorgini, Alessia; Grieco, Antonio; Guerra, Michele; Gulminetti, Roberto; Ieluzzi, Donatella; Imparato, Michele; Iodice, Valentina; La Monica, Silvia; Lazzarin, Adriano; Lenzi, Marco; Levrero, Massimo; Lichtner, Myriam; Lionetti, Raffaella; Guercio, Carmela Lo; Madonna, Salvatore; Magnani, Silvia; Maida, Ivana; Marignani, Massimo; Marrone, Aldo; Marsetti, Fabio; Martini, Silvia; Masarone, Mario; Maserati, Renato; Mastroianni, Claudio Maria; Memoli, Massimo; Menzaghi, Barbara; Merli, Manuela; Miele, Luca; Milella, Michele; Mondelli, Mario; Montalbano, Marzia; Monti, Monica; Morelli, Olivia; Morisco, Filomena; Nardone, Gaetano; Novara, Sergio; Onnelli, Giovanna; Onofrio, Mirella; Paganin, Simona; Pani, Luca; Parisi, Maria Rita; Parruti, Giustino; Pasquazzi, Caterina; Pasulo, Luisa; Perno, Carlo Federico; Persico, Marcello; Piai, Guido; Picciotto, Antonino; Pigozzi, Grazielle Marie; Piovesan, Sara; Piras, Maria Chiara; Pirisi, Massimo; Piscaglia, Anna Maria; Ponti, Laura; Potenza, Domenico; Pravadelli, Cecilia; Quartini, Mariano; Quirino, Tiziana; Raimondo, Giovanni; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Rendina, Maria; Rizzardini, Giuliano; Rizzetto, Mario; Rizzo, Salvatore; Romagnoli, Dante; Romano, Antonietta; Rossi, Cristina; Rumi, Maria Grazia; Russello, Maurizio; Russo, Francesca Paolo; Russo, Maria Luisa; Sansonno, Domenico Ettore; Santantonio, Teresa Antonia; Saracco, Giorgio; Schimizzi, Anna Maria; Serviddio, Gaetano; Simeone, Filomena; Solinas, Attilio; Soria, Alessandro; Tabone, Marco; Taliani, Gloria; Tarantino, Giuseppe; Tarquini, Pierluigi; Tavio, Marcello; Termite, Antonio; Teti, Elisabetta; Toniutto, Pierluigi; Torti, Carlo; Tundi, Paolo; Vecchiet, Giacomo; Verucchi, Gabriella; Gentilucci, Umberto Vespasiani; Vinci, Maria; Vullo, Vincenzo; Zolfino, Teresa; Zuin, MassimoAscione, Antonio; De Luca, Massimo; Melazzini, Mario; Montilla, Simona; Trotta, Maria Paola; Petta, Salvatore; Puoti, Massimo; Sangiovanni, Vincenzo; Messina, Vincenzo; Bruno, Savino; Izzi, Antonio; Villa, Erica; Aghemo, Alessio; Zignego, Anna Linda; Orlandini, Alessandra; Fontanella, Luca; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Marzioni, Marco; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Craxì, Antonio; Abbati, Giuseppe; Alberti, Alfredo; Andreone, Pietro; Andreoni, Massimo; Angeli, Paolo; Angelico, Mario; Angarano, Gioacchino; Angrisani, Debora; Antinori, Andrea; Antonini, Cinzia; Avancini, Ivo; Barone, Michele; Bruno, Raffaele; Benedetti, Antonio; Bernabucci, Veronica; Blanc, Pier; Boarini, Chiara; Boffa, Nicola; Boglione, Lucio; Borghi, Vanni; Borgia, Guglielmo; Brancaccio, Giuseppina; Brunetto, Maurizia; Cacciola, Irene; Calabrese, Paolo; Calvaruso, Vincenza; Campagnolo, Davide; Canovari, Benedetta; Caporaso, Nicola; Capra, Franco; Carolo, Giada; Cassola, Giovanni; Castelli, Francesco; Cauda, Roberto; Silberstein, Francesca Ceccherini; Cecere, Roberto; Chessa, Luchino; Chiodera, Alessandro; Chirianni, Antonio; Ciancio, Alessia; Cima, Serena; Coco, Barbara; Colombo, Massimo; Coppola, Nicola; Corti, Giampaolo; Cosco, Lucio; Corradori, Silvia; Cozzolongo, Raffaele; Cristaudo, Antonio; Danieli, Elena; Monforte, Antonella D’Arminio; Monache, Marco delle; Del Poggio, Paolo; de Luca, Andrea; Dentone, Chiara; Di Biagio, Antonio; Di Leo, Alfredo; Di Perri, Giovanni; DI STEFANO, Marco; D’Offizi, Giampiero; Donato, Francesca; Durante, Emanuele; Erne, Elke; Fagiuoli, Stefano; Falasca, Katia; Federico, Alessandro; Felder, Martina; Ferrari, Carlo; Gaeta, Giovanni Battista; Ganga, Roberto; Gatti, Pietro; Giacomet, Vania; Giacometti, Andrea; Gianstefani, Alice; Giordani, Maria; Giorgini, Alessia; Grieco, Antonio; Guerra, Michele; Gulminetti, Roberto; Ieluzzi, Donatella; Imparato, Michele; Iodice, Valentina; La Monica, Silvia; Lazzarin, Adriano; Lenzi, Marco; Levrero, Massimo; Lichtner, Myriam; Lionetti, Raffaella; Guercio, Carmela Lo; Madonna, Salvatore; Magnani, Silvia; Maida, Ivana; Marignani, Massimo; Marrone, Aldo; Marsetti, Fabio; Martini, Silvia; Masarone, Mario; Maserati, Renato; Mastroianni, Claudio Maria; Memoli, Massimo; Menzaghi, Barbara; Merli, Manuela; Miele, Luca; Milella, Michele; Mondelli, Mario; Montalbano, Marzia; Monti, Monica; Morelli, Olivia; Morisco, Filomena; Nardone, Gaetano; Novara, Sergio; Onnelli, Giovanna; Onofrio, Mirella; Paganin, Simona; Pani, Luca; Parisi, Maria Rita; Parruti, Giustino; Pasquazzi, Caterina; Pasulo, Luisa; Perno, Carlo Federico; Persico, Marcello; Piai, Guido; Picciotto, Antonino; Pigozzi, Grazielle Marie; Piovesan, Sara; Piras, Maria Chiara; Pirisi, Massimo; Piscaglia, Anna Maria; Ponti, Laura; Potenza, Domenico; Pravadelli, Cecilia; Quartini, Mariano; Quirino, Tiziana; Raimondo, Giovanni; Rapaccini, Gian Ludovico; Rendina, Maria; Rizzardini, Giuliano; Rizzetto, Mario; Rizzo, Salvatore; Romagnoli, Dante; Romano, Antonietta; Rossi, Cristina; Rumi, Maria Grazia; Russello, Maurizio; Russo, Francesca Paolo; Russo, Maria Luisa; Sansonno, Domenico Ettore; Santantonio, Teresa Antonia; Saracco, Giorgio; Schimizzi, Anna Maria; Serviddio, Gaetano; Simeone, Filomena; Solinas, Attilio; Soria, Alessandro; Tabone, Marco; Taliani, Gloria; Tarantino, Giuseppe; Tarquini, Pierluigi; Tavio, Marcello; Termite, Antonio; Teti, Elisabetta; Toniutto, Pierluigi; Torti, Carlo; Tundi, Paolo; Vecchiet, Giacomo; Verucchi, Gabriella; Gentilucci, Umberto Vespasiani; Vinci, Maria; Vullo, Vincenzo; Zolfino, Teresa; Zuin, Massim

Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection with cirrhosis (ABACUS): a prospective observational study

Background We ran a compassionate use nationwide programme (ABACUS) to provide access to ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with dasabuvir, plus ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, plus ribavirin for HCV genotype 4 infection in patients with cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation while approval of these regimens was pending in Italy. Methods In this prospective observational study, we collected data from a compassionate use nationwide programme from March 17, 2014, to May 28, 2015. Patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation were given coformulated ombitasvir (25 mg), paritaprevir (150 mg), and ritonavir (100 mg) once daily and dasabuvir (250 mg) twice daily for 12 weeks (patients with HCV genotype 1b infection) or 24 weeks (patients with HCV genotype 1a infection). Patients with HCV genotype 4 infection were given coformulated ombitasvir (25 mg), paritaprevir (150 mg), and ritonavir (100 mg) once per day for 24 weeks. All patients were given weight-based ribavirin. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at week 12 after the end of treatment (SVR12), analysed by intention-to-treat. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with SVR12. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Findings 728 (96%) of 762 patients with cirrhosis who were given ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin therapy for 12 or 24 weeks achieved SVR12. Logistic regression analyses identified that bilirubin concentrations of less than 2 mg/dL were associated with SVR12 (odds ratio [OR] 4·76 [95% CI 1·83–12·3]; p=0·001). 166 (23%) of 734 patients included in safety analyses had an adverse event. 25 (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Asthenia was the most commonly reported adverse event, occurring in 36 (5%) patients. Interpretation Our findings suggest that the safety and effectiveness of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with or without dasabuvir, plus ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection and cirrhosis at high risk of decompensation in a real-life setting are similar to those reported in clinical trials. The concordance with clinical trials provides reassurance that the reported efficacy of this treatment in clinical trials will translate to its use in routine clinical practice. Funding Dipartimento Biomedico di Medicina Interna e Specialistica dell'Universita di Palermo

Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2) : a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy

Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86-1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91-1·32; p=0·21). Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable