4 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Classifying the world anti-doping agency's 2005 prohibited list using the Chemistry Development Kit fingerprint
Presented at CompLife 2006, Cambridge, 27-29 September 2006.We used the freely available Chemistry Development Kit (CDK) fingerprint to classify 5235 representative molecules taken from ten banned classes in the 2005 World Anti-Doping Agency’s (WADA) prohibited list, including molecules taken from the corresponding activity classes in the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR). We used both Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN)algorithms to generate classifiers. The kNN classifiers with k = 1 gave a very slightly better Matthews Correlation Coefficient than the Random Forest classifiers; the latter, however, predicted fewer false positives. The performance of kNN classifiers tended to decline with increasing k. The performance of the CDK fingerprint is essentially equivalent to that of Unity 2D. Our results suggest that it will be possible to use freely available chemoinformatics tools to aid the fight against drugs in sport, while minimising the risk of wrongfully penalising innocent athletes.EPSRC
Unileve
Chemoinformatics-based classification of prohibited substances employed for doping in sport
Representative molecules from 10 classes of prohibited substances were taken from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) list, augmented by molecules from corresponding activity classes found in the MDDR database. Together with some explicitly allowed compounds, these formed a set of 5245 molecules. Five types of fingerprints were calculated for these substances. The random forest classification method was used to predict membership of each prohibited class on the basis of each type of fingerprint, using 5-fold cross-validation. We also used a k-nearest neighbors (kNN) approach, which worked well for the smallest values of k. The most successful classifiers are based on Unity 2D fingerprints and give very similar Matthews correlation coefficients of 0.836 (kNN) and 0.829 (random forest). The kNN classifiers tend to give a higher recall of positives at the expense of lower precision. A naïve Bayesian classifier, however, lies much further toward the extreme of high recall and low precision. Our results suggest that it will be possible to produce a reliable and quantitative assignment of membership or otherwise of each class of prohibited substances. This should aid the fight against the use of bioactive novel compounds as doping agents, while also protecting athletes against unjust disqualification
Similarity Methods in Chemoinformatics
promoting access to White Rose research paper