Urban Airborne Lead: X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Establishes Soil as Dominant Source

BACKGROUND: Despite the dramatic decrease in airborne lead over the past three decades, there are calls for regulatory limits on this potent pediatric neurotoxin lower even than the new (2008) US Environmental Protection Agency standard. To achieve further decreases in airborne lead, what sources would need to be decreased and what costs would ensue? Our aim was to identify and, if possible, quantify the major species (compounds) of lead in recent ambient airborne particulate matter collected in El Paso, TX, USA. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used synchrotron-based XAFS (x-ray absorption fine structure) to identify and quantify the major Pb species. XAFS provides molecular-level structural information about a specific element in a bulk sample. Pb-humate is the dominant form of lead in contemporary El Paso air. Pb-humate is a stable, sorbed complex produced exclusively in the humus fraction of Pb-contaminated soils; it also is the major lead species in El Paso soils. Thus such soil must be the dominant source, and its resuspension into the air, the transfer process, providing lead particles to the local air. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Current industrial and commercial activity apparently is not a major source of airborne lead in El Paso, and presumably other locales that have eliminated such traditional sources as leaded gasoline. Instead, local contaminated soil, legacy of earlier anthropogenic Pb releases, serves as a long-term reservoir that gradually leaks particulate lead to the atmosphere. Given the difficulty and expense of large-scale soil remediation or removal, fugitive soil likely constrains a lower limit for airborne lead levels in many urban settings

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Experimental and theoretical investigation of the mobilization, immobilization and sequestration of subsurface metals through manipulation of carbonate equilibria

This dissertation investigates the forced mobilization, immobilization and sequestration of heavy metals and radionuclides in the ground water environment. Metal mobility/immobility can be effectively controlled by the manipulation of carbonate equilibria. Three different aspects of its potential application as an in situ remediation technology to clean up contaminated aquifers are investigated. A laboratory experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of CO2 partial pressure manipulation, acting as the driver of the carbonate equilibria system, to modify metal mobility in calcite-bearing soils. In a first step, mobilization occurs when CO2 is injected into the ground water lowering its pH; this forces the release of the metals bound to the solid phase. Down gradient, immobilization occurs when the excess CO 2 is removed from the ground water during air sparging, reversing the previous process by increasing the pH of the ground water and causing the metals to partition onto the solid phase. The results show that CO2 charging/air sparging effectively mobilized/immobilized Mn2+, Zn2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+. Predictions of mobilized and immobilized concentrations were made. These were based on the equilibrium exchange reaction of cations between the solid solution and the aqueous phase. The predicted results were in close agreement with the observed data. A second laboratory experiment was conducted to assess the effectiveness of solid solution formation through carbonate precipitation for the in situ remediation of ground water contaminated with heavy metals and radionuclides. The experiment simulated the flow of ground water through an inert isotropic porous medium. Three different treatments (calcium carbonate, metal carbonate, and pH) were compared to a control baseline run. Plumes of contamination containing Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu 2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+ were intercepted by remediation zones generated by the injection of different treatment solutions. Metal carbonate precipitation was the most effective treatment in terms of aqueous metal removal, whereas calcium carbonate (calcite) treatment was the most effective in terms of pH stability. Based on these results a sequence of treatments is proposed where a major portion of contamination is precipitated as carbonates, followed by a calcite treatment to coat the other precipitates, to keep the system carbonate saturated and to further decrease the aqueous metals concentrations by coprecipitation. In addition to the two laboratory experiments, a computer model was developed to obtain information about both the substituting and non-substituting ions during solid solution formation and how their proportions affect the coprecipitation of the foreign ion. The governing equations of this model are based on a mass balance done in differential form of the main species present in the system, which is conceptually represented by a mixed flow reactor. An experimental reaction rate equation from the literature is used to approximate the reaction kinetics existent during the precipitation of calcite. Results indicate that coprecipitation increases when CO3 \u3e Ca. This occurs even for trace elements that preferentially partition into the aqueous phase

The simulated effects of dynamic stall on teeter response for wind turbines

Abstract not availabl

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field