Axolotl Roadkill – Die Plagiatsdebatte um Helene Hegemann

Da kein Abstract des Artikels vorhanden ist, finden Sie hier den Beginn des Artikels: Der Unterschied zwischen Plagiat und Fälschung manifestiert sich in der Autorschaft. Elisabeth Frenzel definiert diese Unterscheidung folgendermassen: «Während der Plagiator sich frem­des literarisches Gut aneignet und als eigenes ausgibt, schiebt der Fälscher das eigene Produkt einem anderen Autor unter.» Gemäss Hellmut Rosenfeld gilt das Plagiat als «Usurpation von Erzeugnissen der Geistesarbeit anderer, […] in der öffentlichen Meinung als unehrenhaft oder sogar moralisch verwerflich». Die etymologische Herkunft des Begriffs Plagiat gestaltet sich aus dem griechischen ‹plagios›, was so viel bedeutet wie «schräg», «quer», «zweideutig» und «unredlich»

A population-based survey on tanning bed use in Germany

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The suntanning industry has grown up over the last decade in Europe, mainly because tanned skin is considered socially desirable and attractive. Because of the potential negative impact of artificial tanning on public health, this study was to investigate tanning bed use behaviour, UV related risk perception and beliefs about tanning in the German population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In 2007, a representative telephone survey was carried out among 1501 German residents aged 14 years and older.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>More than one fourth (28%) of the German population have used tanning beds at least once before in their lifetime. High-frequency tanning behaviour, i.e. using tanning beds more than 10 times per year, were recorded for 11%. Men and women aged 18 to 44 years and young women under the age of 18 used tanning beds more frequently (>10 times per year). Tanning bed use was positively related to appearance and lifestyle related beliefs as well as to the perception that tanned skin is healthy.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This analysis indicates that tanning bed use is common in Germany. The positive relationships of appearance and health related beliefs with tanning bed use are of great concern. The results indicate underlying misconceptions about the positive effect of artificial UV radiation compared to natural UV radiation particular for high-frequency tanners. The data shows the importance as well as the limitations for risk communication in its current effort to inform effectively about the dangers of artificial UV radiation.</p

Change over time in functional capacity and self-perceived health status for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a registry-based longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a major public health problem worldwide. Both self-reported functional capacity and self-perceived health status are reduced in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Previous studies mostly assessed functional capacity through self-reported questionnaires instead of objective measurements. The aim of this study, therefore, is to assess the amount of change over time and its clinical meaningfulness in functional capacity and self-perceived health status of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain undergoing Bern Ambulatory Interprofessional Rehabilitation (BAI-Reha). METHODS The registry-based longitudinal cohort study with prospectively collected data from a rehabilitation programme took place in a real-life setting. Patients (n = 81) with chronic musculoskeletal pain took part in the BAI-Reha. The main outcomes were the six-minute-walk test (6MWT), the safe maximum floor-to-waist lift (SML) and the European Quality of Life and Health measure visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). Timepoints of measurement were at baseline and post-BAI-Reha (i.e., at 4 months). The quantity of interest was the adjusted time effect (point estimate, 95% confidence interval, and p-value for testing the null hypothesis of no change over time). Statistical significance (α = 0.05) and clinical meaningfulness of the mean value change over time were assessed using predefined thresholds (six-minute-walk test 50 m, SML 7 kg, and EQ VAS 10 points). RESULTS The linear mixed model analysis showed a statistically significant change over time for the six-minute-walk test (mean value change 56.08 m, 95% CI [36.13, 76.03]; p <0.001), SML (mean value change 3.92 kg, 95% CI [2.66, 5.19]; p <0.001), and EQ VAS (mean value change 9.58 points, 95% CI [4.87, 14.28]; p <0.001). Moreover, the improvement in the six-minute-walk test is clinically meaningful (mean value change 56.08 m) and almost clinically meaningful (mean value change 9.58 points) in the EQ VAS. CONCLUSION Patients walk further, lift more weight, and feel healthier after interprofessional rehabilitation when compared to baseline measurement. These findings confirm and add to previous results. IMPLICATIONS We encourage other providers of rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain to measure functional capacity with objective outcome variables and to use self-reported outcome measures in addition to self-perceived health status. The well-established assessments used in this study are suitable for this purpose

Psychological and psychosocial interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia:a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Many patients with schizophrenia have symptoms that do not respond to antipsychotics. This condition is called treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has not received specific attention as opposed to general schizophrenia. Psychological and psychosocial interventions as an add-on treatment to pharmacotherapy could be useful, but their role and comparative efficacy to each other and to standard care in this population are not known. We investigated the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychological and psychosocial interventions for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.METHODS: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic database search in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for articles published from inception up to Jan 31, 2020. We also searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group registry for studies published from inception up to March 31, 2022, and PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published from inception up to July 31, 2023. We included RCTs that included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary outcome was overall symptoms. We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and NMAs to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. No people with lived experience were involved throughout the research process. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022358696.FINDINGS: We identified 30 326 records, excluding 24 526 by title and abstract screening. 5762 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 5540 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, and 222 reports corresponding to 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 52 RCTs with 5034 participants (1654 [33·2%] females and 3325 [66·8%] males with sex indicated) comparing 20 psychological and psychosocial interventions provided data for the NMA. Mean age of participants was 38·05 years (range 23·10-48·50). We aimed to collect ethnicity data, but they were scarcely reported. According to the quality of evidence, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; SMD -0·22, 95% CI -0·35 to -0·09, 35 trials), virtual reality intervention (SMD -0·41, -0·79 to -0·02, four trials), integrated intervention (SMD -0·70, -1·18 to -0·22, three trials), and music therapy (SMD -1·27, -1·83 to -0·70, one study) were more efficacious than standard care in reducing overall symptoms. No indication of publication bias was identified.INTERPRETATION: We provide robust findings that CBTp can reduce the overall symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and therefore clinicians can prioritise this intervention in their clinical practice. Other psychological and psychosocial interventions showed promising results but need further investigation.FUNDING: DAAD-ASFE.</p

Immersion : Grenzen und Metaphorik des digitalen Subjekts

2. Hrsg. des Heftes: Dawid Kasprowicz Prof. Dr. Jens Schröter, Dr. Pablo Abend und J.-Prof. Dr. Benjamin Beil sind Herausgeber der Reihe. Die Herausgeber der einzelnen Hefte sind renommierte Wissenschaftler und -innen aus dem In- und Ausland.Von der Verschränkung unseres Alltags mit digitalen Medien bis hin zum Erlebniswert technisch-responsiver Räume über das Attunement atmosphärisch gestimmter Arbeitsplätze: All diese Formen der Einbettung oder des Eintauchens in mediatisierte Umwelten finden ihre Bezeichnung als Immersion. Die Immersion ist dabei aber weder für digitale noch für artifizielle Umwelten reserviert. Sie stellt vielmehr eine Medienpraxis für die Konstruktion von Subjektivität und dessen Grenzen dar. Subjektivität ist damit unter Bedingungen der Immersion eben keine Auflösungs- oder Täuschungsfigur. Denn so heterogen das Verfahren der Immersion auch sein mag, so zielt es doch auf die Frage nach neuen Bestimmungen des Selbst, des Körpers sowie der Emotionalität und nicht zuletzt der jeweils neu gesetzten Abgrenzung zur Umwelt ab. Die Beiträge in diesem Heft versammeln solche Verfahren der Immersion anhand von Phänomenen wie dem Affekt, der Musik, der Leiblichkeit, der Animation, dem kollektiven Gedenken oder der kinematographischen Projektion

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world