15 research outputs found

    Chromogranin A in uremia: Progressive retention of immunoreactive fragments

    Get PDF
    Chromogranin A in uremia: Progressive retention of immunoreactive fragments. Chromogranin A is a soluble protein that is stored and released with catecholamines from their secretory vesicles. Its measurement is a probe of exocytotic sympathoadrenal activity, and in plasma it may also be a useful tool in the diagnosis of peptide producing endocrine neoplasms. Because we have found that chromogranin A is elevated in secondary (uremic) hyperparathyroidism, we systematically investigated the influence of renal dysfunction and its attendant hyperparathyroidism on chromogranin A in several subject groups: normal controls (serum creatinine≀1.2 mg/dl), nonazotemic renal transplant recipients, nonazotemic subjects with glomerular disease (serum creatinine between 1.2 and 2 mg/dl), mid-range renal disease subjects (serum creatinine between 2 and 7.5 mg/dl), and end-stage renal disease subjects (serum creatinine <7.5 mg/dl). Plasma chromogranin A rose with deterioration of renal function, and the rise was independent of etiologic diagnosis, blood pressure, or indices of sympathoadrenal activity or hyperparathyroidism. Size fractionation of uremic plasma by gel filtration, and immunoextraction by region-specific anti-chromo-granin A (anti-N-terminal, anti-C-terminal, and antimid-molecule) antibodies suggested that chromogranin A immunoreactivity circulates in uremia as lower molecular weight fragments of the parent chromogranin A molecule, with mid-molecule fragments the major constituent. This immunoreactivity is only minimally removed by peritoneal dialysis and is not at all hemodialyzable. The uremia-dose-dependent accumulation of chromogranin A immunoreactive fragments in renal failure suggests that the kidney is a major site of disposition or removal of the immunoreactivity. Furthermore, lack of detectable chromogranin A immunoreactivity in normal subjects' urine suggests that the immunoreactivity is destroyed as it is removed by the kidney. We conclude that plasma chromogranin A increases in proportion to degree of renal insufficiency and that renal function must therefore be controlled when using plasma chromogranin A in the investigation of amine or peptide hormone storage and release

    Toward a Unification of Star Formation Rate Determinations in the Milky Way and Other Galaxies

    Full text link
    The star formation rate (SFR) of the Milky Way remains poorly known, with often-quoted values ranging from 1 to 10 solar masses per year. This situation persists despite the potential for the Milky Way to serve as the ultimate SFR calibrator for external galaxies. We show that various estimates for the Galactic SFR are consistent with one another once they have been normalized to the same initial mass function (IMF) and massive star models, converging to 1.9 +/- 0.4 M_sun/yr. However, standard SFR diagnostics are vulnerable to systematics founded in the use of indirect observational tracers sensitive only to high-mass stars. We find that absolute SFRs measured using resolved low/intermediate-mass stellar populations in Galactic H II regions are systematically higher by factors of ~2-3 as compared with calibrations for SFRs measured from mid-IR and radio emission. We discuss some potential explanations for this discrepancy and conclude that it could be allayed if (1) the power-law slope of the IMF for intermediate-mass (1.5 M_sun < m < 5 M_sun) stars were steeper than the Salpeter slope, or (2) a correction factor was applied to the extragalactic 24 micron SFR calibrations to account for the duration of star formation in individual mid-IR-bright H II regions relative to the lifetimes of O stars. Finally, we present some approaches for testing if a Galactic SFR of ~2 M_sun/yr is consistent with what we would measure if we could view the Milky Way as external observers. Using luminous radio supernova remnants and X-ray point sources, we find that the Milky Way deviates from expectations at the 1-3 sigma level, hinting that perhaps the Galactic SFR is overestimated or extragalactic SFRs need to be revised upwards.Comment: Accepted for publication in A

    Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals

    Get PDF
    Habitat loss is the primary driver of biodiversity decline worldwide, but the effects of fragmentation (the spatial arrangement of remaining habitat) are debated. We tested the hypothesis that forest fragmentation sensitivity—affected by avoidance of habitat edges—should be driven by historical exposure to, and therefore species’ evolutionary responses to disturbance. Using a database containing 73 datasets collected worldwide (encompassing 4489 animal species), we found that the proportion of fragmentation-sensitive species was nearly three times as high in regions with low rates of historical disturbance compared with regions with high rates of disturbance (i.e., fires, glaciation, hurricanes, and deforestation). These disturbances coincide with a latitudinal gradient in which sensitivity increases sixfold at low versus high latitudes. We conclude that conservation efforts to limit edges created by fragmentation will be most important in the world’s tropical forests

    BIOFRAG: A new database for analysing BIOdiversity responses to forest FRAGmentation

    Get PDF
    Habitat fragmentation studies are producing inconsistent and complex results across which it is nearly impossible to synthesise. Consistent analytical techniques can be applied to primary datasets, if stored in a flexible database that allows simple data retrieval for subsequent analyses. Method: We developed a relational database linking data collected in the field to taxonomic nomenclature, spatial and temporal plot attributes and further environmental variables (e.g. information on biogeographic region. Typical field assessments include measures of biological variables (e.g. presence, abundance, ground cover) of one species or a set of species linked to a set of plots in fragments of a forested landscape. Conclusion: The database currently holds records of 5792 unique species sampled in 52 landscapes in six of eight biogeographic regions: mammals 173, birds 1101, herpetofauna 284, insects 2317, other arthropods: 48, plants 1804, snails 65. Most species are found in one or two landscapes, but some are found in four. Using the huge amount of primary data on biodiversity response to fragmentation becomes increasingly important as anthropogenic pressures from high population growth and land demands are increasing. This database can be queried to extract data for subsequent analyses of the biological response to forest fragmentation with new metrics that can integrate across the components of fragmented landscapes. Meta-analyses of findings based on consistent methods and metrics will be able to generalise over studies allowing inter-comparisons for unified answers. The database can thus help researchers in providing findings for analyses of trade-offs between land use benefits and impacts on biodiversity and to track performance of management for biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes.Fil: Pfeifer, Marion. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Lefebvre, Veronique. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Gardner, Toby A.. Stockholm Environment Institute; SueciaFil: Arroyo RodrĂ­guez, VĂ­ctor. Universidad Nacional AutĂłnoma de MĂ©xico; MĂ©xicoFil: Baeten, Lander. University of Ghent; BĂ©lgicaFil: Banks Leite, Cristina. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Barlow, Jos. Lancaster University; Reino UnidoFil: Betts, Matthew G.. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Brunet, Joerg. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; SueciaFil: Cerezo BlandĂłn, Alexis Mauricio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de AgronomĂ­a. Departamento de MĂ©todos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de InformaciĂłn; ArgentinaFil: Cisneros, Laura M.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Collard, Stuart. Nature Conservation Society of South Australia; AustraliaFil: DÂŽCruze, Neil. The World Society for the Protection of Animals; Reino UnidoFil: Da Silva Motta, Catarina. MinistĂ©rio da CiĂȘncia, Tecnologia, InovaçÔes. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazĂŽnia; BrasilFil: Duguay, Stephanie. Carleton University; CanadĂĄFil: Eggermont, Hilde. University of Ghent; BĂ©lgicaFil: Eigenbrod, FĂ©lix. University of Southampton; Reino UnidoFil: Hadley, Adam S.. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Hanson, Thor R.. No especifĂ­ca;Fil: Hawes, Joseph E.. University of East Anglia; Reino UnidoFil: Heartsill Scalley, Tamara. United State Department of Agriculture. Forestry Service; Puerto RicoFil: Klingbeil, Brian T.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Kolb, Annette. Universitat Bremen; AlemaniaFil: Kormann, Urs. UniversitĂ€t Göttingen; AlemaniaFil: Kumar, Sunil. State University of Colorado - Fort Collins; Estados UnidosFil: Lachat, Thibault. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest; SuizaFil: Lakeman Fraser, Poppy. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Lantschner, MarĂ­a Victoria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - BahĂ­a Blanca; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de TecnologĂ­a Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. EstaciĂłn Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Laurance, William F.. James Cook University; AustraliaFil: Leal, Inara R.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Lens, Luc. University of Ghent; BĂ©lgicaFil: Marsh, Charles J.. University of Leeds; Reino UnidoFil: Medina Rangel, Guido F.. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; ColombiaFil: Melles, Stephanie. University of Toronto; CanadĂĄFil: Mezger, Dirk. Field Museum of Natural History; Estados UnidosFil: Oldekop, Johan A.. University of Sheffield; Reino UnidoFil: Overal , Williams L.. Museu Paraense EmĂ­lio Goeldi. Departamento de Entomologia; BrasilFil: Owen, Charlotte. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Peres, Carlos A.. University of East Anglia; Reino UnidoFil: Phalan, Ben. University of Southampton; Reino UnidoFil: Pidgeon, Anna Michle. University of Wisconsin; Estados UnidosFil: Pilia, Oriana. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Possingham, Hugh P.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. The University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Possingham, Max L.. No especifĂ­ca;Fil: Raheem, Dinarzarde C.. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences; BĂ©lgica. Natural History Museum; Reino UnidoFil: Ribeiro, Danilo B.. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul; BrasilFil: Ribeiro Neto, Jose D.. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; BrasilFil: Robinson, Douglas W.. State University of Oregon; Estados UnidosFil: Robinson, Richard. Manjimup Research Centre; AustraliaFil: Rytwinski, Trina. Carleton University; CanadĂĄFil: Scherber, Christoph. UniversitĂ€t Göttingen; AlemaniaFil: Slade, Eleanor M.. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Somarriba, Eduardo. Centro AgronĂłmico Tropical de InvestigaciĂłn y Enseñanza; Costa RicaFil: Stouffer, Philip C.. State University of Louisiana; Estados UnidosFil: Struebig, Matthew J.. University of Kent; Reino UnidoFil: Tylianakis, Jason M.. University College London; Estados Unidos. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Teja, Tscharntke. UniversitĂ€t Göttingen; AlemaniaFil: Tyre, Andrew J.. Universidad de Nebraska - Lincoln; Estados UnidosFil: Urbina Cardona, Jose N.. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; ColombiaFil: Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.. Universidade Federal de Uberlandia; BrasilFil: Wearn, Oliver. Imperial College London; Reino Unido. The Zoological Society of London; Reino UnidoFil: Wells, Konstans. University of Adelaide; AustraliaFil: Willig, Michael R.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Wood, Eric. University of Wisconsin; Estados UnidosFil: Young, Richard P.. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust; Reino UnidoFil: Bradley, Andrew V.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Ewers, Robert M.. Imperial College London; Reino Unid

    BIOFRAG - a new database for analyzing BIOdiversity responses to forest FRAGmentation

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    The Intersection of Interfacial Forces and Electrochemical Reactions

    Get PDF
    We review recent developments in experimental techniques that simultaneously combine measurements of the interaction forces or energies between two extended surfaces immersed in electrolyte solutions—primarily aqueous—with simultaneous monitoring of their (electro)chemical reactions and controlling the electrochemical surface potential of at least one of the surfaces. Combination of these complementary techniques allows for simultaneous real time monitoring of angstrom level changes in surface thickness and roughness, surface–surface interaction energies, and charge and mass transferred via electrochemical reactions, dissolution, and adsorption, and/or charging of electric double layers. These techniques employ the surface forces apparatus (SFA) combined with various “electrochemical attachments” for in situ measurements of various physical and (electro)chemical properties (e.g., cyclic voltammetry), optical imaging, and electric potentials and currents generated naturally during an interaction, as well as when electric fields (potential differences) are applied between the surfaces and/or solution—in some cases allowing for the chemical reaction equation to be unambiguously determined. We discuss how the physical interactions between two different surfaces when brought close to each other (<10 nm) can affect their chemistry, and suggest further extensions of these techniques to biological systems and simultaneous in situ spectroscopic measurements for chemical analysis

    A Census of Early Phase High-Mass Star Formation in the Central Molecular Zone

    Get PDF
    We present new observations of C-band continuum emission and masers to assess high-mass (>>8 M⊙M_\odot) star formation at early evolutionary phases in the inner 200 pc of the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ) of the Galaxy. The continuum observation is complete to free-free emission from stars above 10-11 M⊙M_\odot in 91% of the covered area. We identify 104 compact sources in the continuum emission, among which five are confirmed ultracompact H II regions, 12 are candidates of ultra-compact H II regions, and the remaining 87 sources are mostly massive stars in clusters, field stars, evolved stars, pulsars, extragalactic sources, or of unknown nature that is to be investigated. We detect class II CH3_3OH masers at 23 positions, among which six are new detections. We confirm six known H2_2CO masers in two high-mass star forming regions, and detect two new H2_2CO masers toward the Sgr C cloud, making it the ninth region in the Galaxy that contains masers of this type. In spite of these detections, we find that current high-mass star formation in the inner CMZ is only taking place in seven isolated clouds. The results suggest that star formation at early evolutionary phases in the CMZ is about 10 times less efficient than expected by the dense gas star formation relation, which is in line with previous studies that focus on more evolved phases of star formation. This means that if there will be any impending, next burst of star formation in the CMZ, it has not yet begun

    Geochronology of granulitized eclogite from the Ama Drime Massif : implications for the tectonic evolution of the South Tibetan Himalaya

    Get PDF
    The Ama Drime Massif (ADM) is an elongate north-south trending antiformal feature that extends ∌70 km north across the crest of the South Tibetan Himalaya and offsets the position of the South Tibetan Detachment system. A detailed U(-Th)-Pb geochronologic study of granulitized mafic eclogites and associated rocks from the footwall of the ADM yields important insights into the middle to late Miocene tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen. The mafic igneous precursor to the granulitized eclogites is 986.6 ± 1.8 Ma and was intruded into the paleoproterozoic (1799 ± 9 Ma) Ama Drime orthogneiss, the latter being similar in age to rocks previously assigned to the Lesser Himalayan Series in the Himalayan foreland. The original eclogite-facies mineral assemblage in the mafic rocks has been strongly overprinted by granulite facies metamorphism at 750°C and 0.7–0.8 GPa. In the host Ama Drime orthogneiss, the granulite event is correlated with synkinematic sillimanite-grade metamorphism and muscovite dehydration melting. Monazite and xenotime ages indicate that the granulite metamorphism and associated anatexis occurred at <13.2 ± 1.4 Ma. High-grade metamorphism was followed by postkinematic leucogranite dyke emplacement at 11.6 ± 0.4 Ma. This integrated data set indicates that high-temperature metamorphism, decompression, and exhumation of the ADM postdates mid-Miocene south directed midcrustal extrusion and is kinematically linked to orogen-parallel extension
    corecore