219 research outputs found

    Estudos preliminares de populações de mexilhão-de-rio (Margaritifera margaritifera l.) nos rios Rabaçal e Tuela Nordeste de Portugal): análise do habitat e da qualidade da água e sedimentos

    Get PDF
    Permanecem pouco estudadas as condições ecológicas dos rios Rabaçal e Tuela que permitem a existência de populações viáveis de mexilhão-de-rio (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Estudos preliminares realizados no Verão de 2009 permitiram caracterizar o habitat e microhabitat usado pela espécie assim como a qualidade da água e sedimentos. Relativamente ao habitat foi aplicada a metodologia RHS (River Habitat Survey) complementada com uma análise do microhabitat. Realizaram-se 30 transectos por cada troço de rio seleccionado e determinadas as variáveis da profundidade, substrato dominante e sub-dominante, velocidade da corrente, medida na coluna de água e no leito, e cobertura em cada área amostrada (0.25 cm2). A M. margaritifera apresentou uma distribuição espacial não aleatória, concentrando-se em zonas específicas. As curvas de preferência permitiram detectar diferenças entre os juvenis, presentes maioritariamente em habitats com corrente, menor profundidade e substrato grosseiro (pedras e seixos), e os adultos, de distribuição mais ampla, capazes de colonizar zonas lênticas, com maior profundidade, ausência de corrente e substrato de granulometria fina (areias). No que respeita à qualidade da água detectou-se baixo teor sais dissolvidos (condutividade < 50 µScm-1) e nutrientes (N-Total <0,1 mg/L) (POM <3 mg/L PIM < 0,01mg/L). Apesar da qualidade da água ser elevada foi detectada uma baixa concentração de coliformes totais na água e sedimento indicando alguma influência antropogénica. Como medida de conservação da espécie nestes rios afigura-se essencial a monitorização das descargas de efluentes domésticos, dos efeitos da regularização e sobrepesca com o intuito de evitar a regressão assinalada noutros rios de Portugal

    Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide data for cancer survival are scarce. We aimed to initiate worldwide surveillance of cancer survival by central analysis of population-based registry data, as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems, and to inform global policy on cancer control. METHODS: Individual tumour records were submitted by 279 population-based cancer registries in 67 countries for 25·7 million adults (age 15-99 years) and 75,000 children (age 0-14 years) diagnosed with cancer during 1995-2009 and followed up to Dec 31, 2009, or later. We looked at cancers of the stomach, colon, rectum, liver, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, and prostate in adults, and adult and childhood leukaemia. Standardised quality control procedures were applied; errors were corrected by the registry concerned. We estimated 5-year net survival, adjusted for background mortality in every country or region by age (single year), sex, and calendar year, and by race or ethnic origin in some countries. Estimates were age-standardised with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. FINDINGS: 5-year survival from colon, rectal, and breast cancers has increased steadily in most developed countries. For patients diagnosed during 2005-09, survival for colon and rectal cancer reached 60% or more in 22 countries around the world; for breast cancer, 5-year survival rose to 85% or higher in 17 countries worldwide. Liver and lung cancer remain lethal in all nations: for both cancers, 5-year survival is below 20% everywhere in Europe, in the range 15-19% in North America, and as low as 7-9% in Mongolia and Thailand. Striking rises in 5-year survival from prostate cancer have occurred in many countries: survival rose by 10-20% between 1995-99 and 2005-09 in 22 countries in South America, Asia, and Europe, but survival still varies widely around the world, from less than 60% in Bulgaria and Thailand to 95% or more in Brazil, Puerto Rico, and the USA. For cervical cancer, national estimates of 5-year survival range from less than 50% to more than 70%; regional variations are much wider, and improvements between 1995-99 and 2005-09 have generally been slight. For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2005-09, 5-year survival was 40% or higher only in Ecuador, the USA, and 17 countries in Asia and Europe. 5-year survival for stomach cancer in 2005-09 was high (54-58%) in Japan and South Korea, compared with less than 40% in other countries. By contrast, 5-year survival from adult leukaemia in Japan and South Korea (18-23%) is lower than in most other countries. 5-year survival from childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is less than 60% in several countries, but as high as 90% in Canada and four European countries, which suggests major deficiencies in the management of a largely curable disease. INTERPRETATION: International comparison of survival trends reveals very wide differences that are likely to be attributable to differences in access to early diagnosis and optimum treatment. Continuous worldwide surveillance of cancer survival should become an indispensable source of information for cancer patients and researchers and a stimulus for politicians to improve health policy and health-care systems

    Measurements of differential production cross sections for a Z boson in association with jets in pp collisions at root s=8 TeV

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Search for leptophobic Z ' bosons decaying into four-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at root s=8 TeV

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Search for black holes and other new phenomena in high-multiplicity final states in proton-proton collisions at root s=13 TeV

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV and combination with 8 TeV search

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in final states with charged leptons, neutrinos, and b quarks

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe
    corecore