Mewujudkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berwibawa Di Indonesia

The authoritative criminal justice system in Indonesia should be realized in order to get trust and respect from the society. The basic norm order which is embraced in the legal principles is the manifestation of the supreme bases, that is the Grand norm of Pancasila. It should become the legal spirit in the legal validity and reality. The authoritative criminal justice system shall occur when the criminal justice system holds high the criminal legal principles as the meta norm and the attitude guidance. The accountability aspect for criminal justice and its implication towards controllability and responsiveness of institute is very significant in the development of the authoritative justice system. Therefore, it requires a system approach to promote structural, substantial, and cultural synchronizations for the sake of the establishment of legal council and institution in the criminal justice system

Heterogeneous contributions of change in population distribution of body mass index to change in obesity and underweight NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)

From 1985 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight decreased, and that of obesity and severe obesity increased, in most regions, with significant variation in the magnitude of these changes across regions. We investigated how much change in mean body mass index (BMI) explains changes in the prevalence of underweight, obesity, and severe obesity in different regions using data from 2896 population-based studies with 187 million participants. Changes in the prevalence of underweight and total obesity, and to a lesser extent severe obesity, are largely driven by shifts in the distribution of BMI, with smaller contributions from changes in the shape of the distribution. In East and Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the underweight tail of the BMI distribution was left behind as the distribution shifted. There is a need for policies that address all forms of malnutrition by making healthy foods accessible and affordable, while restricting unhealthy foods through fiscal and regulatory restrictions

BEKERJANYA PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN

Critical crimonology having contributed to victimology perspective is giving orientation to victim's protection paradigm for prosperity and foundation humanity of the society in order not to be victimized in broad sense. As in crime politics, the crime policies were aiming to reach a society protection and social welfare policies especially through criminal law , as a part of social policies. The social reality of crminal justice , which realized victim protection, was the realization of social construction, build from dynamics interaction between society and for victim included law officer and the formulation of criminal law. Not all of the society action, which caused damage and loss, was believed as a caused of the victim (second victimization) either by the preparation and undertaking of law. The opennes system posit that social construction of victim protection was started from the selected law violations through the definition and responses to the rise of victim which undergo perception and reaction of the society , law officer and the formulation of law systems in order to respond the victim protection. Results of research concluded that the criminal law works not entiely realized victim protection direct or indirectly, even criminal justice could establish structural victimization for the victim himself. Criminal justice working as a mirror of fair which was nort entirely point out the victim protection realty in community. Few phenomenon were found on the research : a. Perception and reaction of victim / community The community gives more reaction and perception to the ordinary or street crime than to white collar crime as a serious crime. This was due to the lack of supervision and completeness of work by the police officer. In certain crime, specially the violence domestic for potential victim either women and children or in decency case, there still reluctantly from society culture take the case before the court and most people not believe that a crime was committed. Society reaction to the criminal justice explained that criminal justice could bring up victimization. b. Perception and reaction of law officer Power paradigm still covered the pattern of work for. So that police, prof:, ow and judge works one-sided, tocused on ordinary crime, and lack for the corporation crime or white collar crime. In executing the works, emerged phenomenon which caused risk secondary victimizatin. Dogma paradigm as a back ground for the attitude of law officer made the victim rights sstill subordinated from the executor side. c. The weakness of formulation of criminal law. The formulation of laws which not reflected victim protection influenced law enforcement of victim protection, as in KUHP, KUHAP, or in UU No. 3, 1971about cleaning of corruption The above perspective emerged ideas of the importance of accountability for criminal justice, and their implications for the controllability and responsivenes of the institution and criminal justice regulation to bring up victim protection

Peranan Hukum Dalam Mendiseminasikan Nilai-nilai Perdamaian

Prosiding Lokakarya "Membangun Perdamaian di Dalam Masyarakat Ber-Bhinneka Tunggal Ika", p. 19-2

Perlindungan korban : suatu perspektif viktimologi dan kriminologi

Buku ini mengidentifikasi dan mengeksplorasi perlindungan hukum terhadap korban atas bekerjanya lembaga dan pranata hukum dalam peradilan pidana.x, 201 hlm.: 21 cm

Refleksi Atas Paradigma Positivisme dalam Ilmu Hukum Menuju Nilai Keadilan

Refleksi Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Ed. Oktober 2010, p. 115-128Refleksi terbadap asumsi landasan keilmuan pada paradigma positivisme dalam ilmu hukwn, memunculkan kajian bahwa pencakupan keseluruhan kebutuhan sosial, apabila hanya diterjemahkan dalam frame peraturan bisa mengalami reduksi. Paradigma positivisme melepaskan hal essensial bahwa hukum adalah bagian dari kehidupan masyarakat dalam pengambilan bahan hukumnya. Konsep paradigma lebih ditujukan pada suatu supremacy of law yang menandaskan central behavior control by law yang bebas nilailvalue free, didasarkan pada aspek fonnalisme belaka sebagai closed logical system. Hal ini menjadi.kan Paradigma Positivisme kurang mendukung pemenuhan keadilan substansial. Pembelajaran dalam ilmu hokum seyogyanya menggugatkan pada hukum tuntutan pemenuhan nilai-nilai moral dan sosial. Melalui Hukum Progresif, maka habitus hukum yang berpusat pada manusia menjadikan bangunan hokum akan diselaraskan antara rules and values in social lif