14 research outputs found

    Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e hipertensión arterial como predictores de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en adultos mayores peruanos con cáncer

    Get PDF
    Objective: To evaluate DM2 and hypertension as predictors of CAP in older adults with cancer. Material and Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of a prospective cohort study in older adults with cancer from the Geriatrics Service of the Centro Médico Naval (CEMENA) of Peru during 2013-2015. T2DM and hypertension diagnosis were obtained from medical records. CAP was defined according to clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria and it was collected from the medical records of the patients up to one year after their inclusion in the study. We used the statistical software STATA v14.0 to develop the analysis. We performed multivariate analysis using crude and adjusted Cox regression models. The reported measure was the hazard ratio (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: A total of 231 older adults with cancer were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 78.6 ± 4.2 (range: 74-92 years) and all of them were men. 33 (14.29%) patients developed CAP during the follow-up, 53 (21.65%) had hypertension, and 56 (22.65%) T2DM. CAP was more frequent in patients with lung cancer and lymphomas. In the adjusted Cox regression models, we found T2DM (aHR=1.49; 95%CI: 1.21-1.79) and hypertension (aHR=1.32; 95%CI: 1.24-1.50) were predictors of CAP incidence. Conclusion: T2DM and hypertension were associated with CAP incidence in oncogeriatric patients. Future intervention studies are needed to improve the functionality and prevent CAP in this vulnerable populationObjetivo: Evaluar la DM2 y la hipertensión como predictores de NAC en adultos mayores con cáncer. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un análisis de base secundaria de una cohorte prospectiva en adultos mayores con diagnóstico de cáncer del Servicio de Geriatría del Centro Médico Naval (CEMENA) del Perú durante 2013-2015. Los diagnósticos de DM2 e hipertensión se obtuvieron de las historias clínicas. La NAC se definió según criterios diagnósticos clínicos y radiológicos y se recogió de las historias clínicas de los pacientes hasta un año después de su inclusión en el estudio. Utilizamos el software estadístico STATA v14.0 para desarrollar el análisis. Realizamos un análisis multivariante utilizando modelos de regresión de Cox crudos y ajustados. La medida reportada fue la razón de hazards (HR) con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza del 95% (IC95%). Resultados: Se analizaron un total de 231 adultos mayores con cáncer. La edad media de los participantes fue de 78,6 ± 4,2 (rango: 74-92 años) y todos ellos eran hombres. 33 (14,29%) pacientes desarrollaron NAC durante el seguimiento, 53 (21,65%) tenían hipertensión y 56 (22,65%) DM2. La NAC fue más frecuente en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón y linfomas. En los modelos de regresión de Cox ajustados se encontró que tener DM2 (HRa=1,49; IC95%: 1,21-1,79) o hipertensión arterial (HRa=1,32; IC95%: 1,24-1,50) fueron predictores para la incidencia de NAC. Conclusiones: La DM2 y la hipertensión se asociaron con la incidencia de NAC en pacientes oncogeriátricos. Son necesarios futuros estudios de intervención para mejorar la funcionalidad y prevenir la NAC en esta población vulnerable

    Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru

    Get PDF
    Widely available and reliable testing for SARS-CoV-2 is essential for the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimated the diagnostic performance of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) performed on saliva and the SD Biosensor STANDARD Q antigen test performed on nasopharyngeal swab compared to the reference standard, nasopharyngeal swab (NP) RT-PCR. We enrolled participants living and/or seeking care in health facilities in North Lima, Peru from November 2020 to January 2021. Consenting participants underwent same-day RT-PCR on both saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens, antigen testing on a nasopharyngeal swab specimen, pulse oximetry, and standardized symptom assessment. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for the nasopharyngeal antigen and saliva RT-PCR compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Of 896 participants analyzed, 567 (63.3%) had acute signs/symptoms of COVID-19. The overall sensitivity and specificity of saliva RT-PCR were 85.8% and 98.1%, respectively. Among participants with and without acute signs/symptoms of COVID-19, saliva sensitivity was 87.3% and 37.5%, respectively. Saliva sensitivity was 97.4% and 56.0% among participants with cycle threshold (CT) values of #30 and .30 on nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of nasopharyngeal antigen were 73.2% and 99.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of the nasopharyngeal antigen test was 75.1% and 12.5% among participants with and without acute signs/symptoms of COVID-19, and 91.2% and 26.7% among participants with CT values of #30 and .30 on nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, respectively. Saliva RT-PCR achieved the WHO-recommended threshold of .80% for sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, while the SD Biosensor nasopharyngeal antigen test did not. IMPORTANCE In this diagnostic validation study of 896 participants in Peru, saliva reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) had .80% sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 among all-comers and symptomatic individuals, while the SD Biosensor STANDARD Q antigen test performed on nasopharyngeal swab had,80% sensitivity, except for participants whose same-day nasopharyngeal RT-PCR results showed cycle threshold values of,30, consistent with a high viral load in the nasopharynx. The specificity was high for both tests. Our results demonstrate that saliva sampling could serve as an alternative noninvasive technique for RT-PCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The role of nasopharyngeal antigen testing is more limited; when community transmission is low, it may be used for mass screenings among asymptomatic individuals with high testing frequency. Among symptomatic individuals, the nasopharyngeal antigen test may be relied upon for 4 to 8 days after symptom onset, or in those likely to have high viral load, whereupon it showed .80% sensitivity.Revisión por pare

    A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Get PDF
    Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges

    A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world

    High prevalence and heterogeneity of Dysglycemia in patients with tuberculosis from Peru: a prospective cohort study

    No full text
    Submitted by Ana Maria Fiscina Sampaio ([email protected]) on 2019-10-29T11:51:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Calderon, R. High....pdf: 2042526 bytes, checksum: 3f541403ffb4892d058d895c77a33074 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Ana Maria Fiscina Sampaio ([email protected]) on 2019-10-29T12:12:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Calderon, R. High....pdf: 2042526 bytes, checksum: 3f541403ffb4892d058d895c77a33074 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-10-29T12:12:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Calderon, R. High....pdf: 2042526 bytes, checksum: 3f541403ffb4892d058d895c77a33074 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-01-11Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica (CONCYTEC-Peru) / Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT, Convenio 175–2015). The work from BBA was supported by intramural research program from FIOCRUZ, by the National Institutes of Health (U01AI115940 and U01AI069923) and by the Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (DECIT) - Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia (SCTIE) – Ministério da Saúde (MS), Brazil (25029.000507/2013–07). MBA receives a fellowship from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa da Bahia (FAPESB). BBA is a senior scientist from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru. Lima, Peru / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Faculdade de Medicina. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação José Silveira. Instituto Brasileiro para Investigação da Tuberculose. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação José Silveira. Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research Initiative. Salvador, BA, Brazil.Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru. Lima, Peru.Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru. Lima, Peru.Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru. Lima, Peru.Fundação José Silveira. Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research Initiative. Salvador, BA, Brazil / Faculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências. Curso de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil.Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação José Silveira. Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research Initiative. Salvador, BA, Brazil.Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Harvard Medical School / Department of Global Health and Social Medicine. Boston, MA, USA.Socios en Salud Sucursal Peru. Lima, Peru / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Faculdade de Medicina. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil / Universidade Federal da Bahia. Faculdade de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação José Silveira. Instituto Brasileiro para Investigação da Tuberculose. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Gonçalo Moniz. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Fundação José Silveira. Multinational Organization Network Sponsoring Translational and Epidemiological Research Initiative. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Faculdade de Tecnologia e Ciências. Curso de Medicina. Salvador, BA, Brasil / Universidade de Salvador. Salvador, BA, Brasil /Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Salvador, BA, Brasil.The accuracy of different laboratory tests for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) and prediabetes (preDM) in populations exposed to tuberculosis (TB) remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the prevalence of DM and preDM in TB affected people in Lima, Peru. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients affected TB and their household contacts (HHC), was conducted between February and November 2017 in Lima, Peru. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were used to detect DM and preDM in a prospective cohort of TB patients (n = 136) and household contacts (n = 138). Diagnostic performance of the laboratory tests was analyzed. Potential effects of sociodemographic and clinical factors on detection of dysglycemia were analyzed. Results: In TB patients, prevalence of DM and preDM was 13.97 and 30.88% respectively. Lower prevalence of both DM (6.52%) and preDM (28.99%) were observed in contacts. FPG, HbA1c and OGTT had poor agreement in detection of preDM in either TB cases or contacts. TB-DM patients had substantially lower hemoglobin levels, which resulted in low accuracy of HbA1c-based diagnosis. Classic sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were not different between TB patients with or without dysglycemia. Conclusion: High prevalence of DM and preDM was found in both TB patients and contacts in Lima. Anemia was strongly associated with TB-DM, which directly affected the diagnostic performance of HbA1c in such population

    Dysglycemia is associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages in tuberculosis patients of North Lima-Peru.

    No full text
    This study was performed to investigate the role of dysglycemia on the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) among pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients to build scientific evidence about the possible mechanisms of TB transmission. MTB isolates obtained of patients affected by pulmonary tuberculosis from health care facilities of North Lima-Peru, were analyzed using whole genome sequencing and 24-locus mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit -variable-number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR). Subsequently, clinical and epidemiological characteristics were associated with clustering, lineages and comorbid conditions. The analysis carried out 112 pulmonary TB patients from various health centers in North Lima, 17 (15%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) and 33 (29%) had pre-diabetes (PDM). Latin American-Mediterranean, Haarlem and Beijing were the most frequent MTB lineages found in those patients. Previous TB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.65; 95%CI: 1.32-17.81), age (aOR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.03-1.45) and Beijing lineage (aOR = 3.53; 95%CI: 1.08-13.2) were associated with TB-DM comorbidity. Alcoholism (aOR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.10-8.28), age (aOR = 1.05; 95%CI: 1.03-1.12) and Haarlem lineage (aOR = 2.54; 95%CI: 1.04-6.51) were associated with TB-PDM comorbidity. Beijing and Haarlem lineages were independently associated with TB-DM and TB-PDM comorbidities, respectively. Although these findings may be surprising, we must be cautious to suggest that dysglycemia could be associated with a highly clustering and predisposition of MTB lineages related to a serious impact on the severity of TB disease, which requires further research

    Author correction: A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

    No full text
    Correction to: Nature Human Behaviour https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01173-x, published online 2 August 2021. In the version of this article initially published, the following authors were omitted from the author list and the Author contributionssection for “investigation” and “writing and editing”: Nandor Hajdu (Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest,Hungary), Jordane Boudesseul (Facultad de Psicología, Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad de Lima, Lima, Perú), RafałMuda (Faculty of Economics, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland) and Sandersan Onie (Black Dog Institute, UNSWSydney, Sydney, Australia & Emotional Health for All Foundation, Jakarta, Indonesia). In addition, Saeideh FatahModares’ name wasoriginally misspelled as Saiedeh FatahModarres in the author list. Further, affiliations have been corrected for Maria Terskova (NationalResearch University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia), Susana Ruiz Fernandez (FOM University of Applied Sciences,Essen; Leibniz-Institut fur Wissensmedien, Tubingen, and LEAD Research Network, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany),Hendrik Godbersen (FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany), Gulnaz Anjum (Department of Psychology, Simon FraserUniversity, Burnaby, Canada, and Department of Economics & Social Sciences, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi, Pakistan)

    In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits: Experimental evidence from 84 countries

    No full text
    The COVID-19 pandemic (and its aftermath) highlights a critical need to communicate health information effectively to the global public. Given that subtle differences in information framing can have meaningful effects on behavior, behavioral science research highlights a pressing question: Is it more effective to frame COVID-19 health messages in terms of potential losses (e.g., "If you do not practice these steps, you can endanger yourself and others") or potential gains (e.g., "If you practice these steps, you can protect yourself and others")? Collecting data in 48 languages from 15,929 participants in 84 countries, we experimentally tested the effects of message framing on COVID-19-related judgments, intentions, and feelings. Loss- (vs. gain-) framed messages increased self-reported anxiety among participants cross-nationally with little-to-no impact on policy attitudes, behavioral intentions, or information seeking relevant to pandemic risks. These results were consistent across 84 countries, three variations of the message framing wording, and 560 data processing and analytic choices. Thus, results provide an empirical answer to a global communication question and highlight the emotional toll of loss-framed messages. Critically, this work demonstrates the importance of considering unintended affective consequences when evaluating nudge-style interventions

    A global test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

    No full text
    The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion regulation strategy which modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries/regions (N = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vs. both control conditions) had consistent effects in reducing negative emotions and increasing positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world to build resilience during the pandemic and beyond

    A Global Experiment on Motivating Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic

    No full text
    Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e. a controlling message) compared to no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly-internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared to the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly-internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing: Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges
    corecore