Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger

On 2017 August 17 a binary neutron star coalescence candidate (later designated GW170817) with merger time 12:41:04 UTC was observed through gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor independently detected a gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) with a time delay of ~1.7 s with respect to the merger time. From the gravitational-wave signal, the source was initially localized to a sky region of 31 deg2 at a luminosity distance of 40+8-8 Mpc and with component masses consistent with neutron stars. The component masses were later measured to be in the range 0.86 to 2.26 Mo. An extensive observing campaign was launched across the electromagnetic spectrum leading to the discovery of a bright optical transient (SSS17a, now with the IAU identification of AT 2017gfo) in NGC 4993 (at ~40 Mpc) less than 11 hours after the merger by the One- Meter, Two Hemisphere (1M2H) team using the 1 m Swope Telescope. The optical transient was independently detected by multiple teams within an hour. Subsequent observations targeted the object and its environment. Early ultraviolet observations revealed a blue transient that faded within 48 hours. Optical and infrared observations showed a redward evolution over ~10 days. Following early non-detections, X-ray and radio emission were discovered at the transient’s position ~9 and ~16 days, respectively, after the merger. Both the X-ray and radio emission likely arise from a physical process that is distinct from the one that generates the UV/optical/near-infrared emission. No ultra-high-energy gamma-rays and no neutrino candidates consistent with the source were found in follow-up searches. These observations support the hypothesis that GW170817 was produced by the merger of two neutron stars in NGC4993 followed by a short gamma-ray burst (GRB 170817A) and a kilonova/macronova powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei synthesized in the ejecta

4-Bromo-2-(piperidin-1-yl)thiazol-5-yl-phenyl methanone (12b) Inhibits Na+/K+-ATPase and Ras Oncogene Activity in Cancer Cells

The in vitro growth inhibitory activity of 26 thiazoles (including 4-halogeno-2,5-disubtituted-1,3-thiazoles) and 5 thienothiazoles was assessed on a panel of 6 human cancer cell lines, including glioma cell lines. (4-Chloro-2-(piperidin-1-yl)thiazol-5-yl)(phenyl)methanone (12a) and (4-bromo-2-(piperidin-1-yl)thiazol-5-yl)(phenyl)methanone (12b) displayed ∼10 times greater in vitro growth inhibitory activity than perillyl alcohol (POH), which therapeutically benefits glioma patients through the inhibition of both alpha-1 Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase (NAK) and Ras oncogene activity. The in vitro cytostatic activities (as revealed by quantitative videomicroscopy) displayed by 12a and 12b were independent of the intrinsic resistance to pro-apoptotic stimuli associated with cancer cells. Compounds 12a and 12b displayed relatively similar inhibitory activities on purified guinea pig brain preparations that mainly express NAK alpha-2 and alpha-3 subunits, whereas only compound 12b was efficacious against purified guinea pig kidney preparations that mainly express the NAK alpha-1 subunit, which is also expressed in gliomas, melanomas and non-small-cell lung cancers NSCLCs.Journal ArticleSCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Variable ventilation improves pulmonary function and reduces lung damage without increasing bacterial translocation in a rat model of experimental pneumonia

Variable ventilation has been shown to improve pulmonary function and reduce lung damage in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nevertheless, variable ventilation has not been tested during pneumonia. Theoretically, periodic increases in tidal volume (VT) and airway pressures might worsen the impairment of alveolar barrier function usually seen in pneumonia and could increase bacterial translocation into the bloodstream. We investigated the impact of variable ventilation on lung function and histologic damage, as well as markers of lung inflammation, epithelial and endothelial cell damage, and alveolar stress, and bacterial translocation in experimental pneumonia. Thirty-two Wistar rats were randomly assigned to receive intratracheal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) or saline (SAL) (n\u2009=\u200916/group). After 24-h, animals were anesthetized and ventilated for 2 h with either conventional volume-controlled (VCV) or variable volume-controlled ventilation (VV), with mean VT\u2009=\u20096 mL/kg, PEEP\u2009=\u20095cmH2O, and FiO2\u2009=\u20090.4. During VV, tidal volume varied randomly with a coefficient of variation of 30% and a Gaussian distribution. Additional animals assigned to receive either PA or SAL (n\u2009=\u20098/group) were not ventilated (NV) to serve as controls.Conclusiosion: this rat model of pneumonia, VV improved pulmonary function and reduced lung damage as compared to VCV, without increasing bacterial translocation

Interaction of Leptospira with the Innate Immune System

International audienceInnate immunity encompasses immediate host responses that detect and respond to microbes. Besides recognition by the complement system (see the chapter by A. Barbosa, this volume), innate immunity concerns cellular responses. These are triggered through recognition of conserved microbial components (called MAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading, through secretion of cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and immune mediators, to cellular recruitment and phagocytosis. Leptospira spp. are successful zoonotic pathogenic bacteria that obviously overcome the immune system of their hosts. The first part of this chapter summarizes what is known about leptospires recognition and interaction with phagocytes and other innate immune cells, and the second part describes specific interactions of leptospiral MAMPs with PRRs from the TLR and NLR families. On the one hand, pathogenic leptospires appear to escape macrophage and neutrophil phagocytosis. On the other hand, studies about PRR sensing of leptospires remain very limited, but suggest that pathogenic leptospires escape some of the PRRs in a host-specific manner, due to peculiar cell wall specificities or post-translational modifications that may impair their recognition. Further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms and consequences of leptospiral escape on phagocytic functions and hopefully give clues to potential therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring the defective activation of PRRs by pathogenic Leptospira spp