Інженерна геодезія. Методичні рекомендації до виконання лабораторних робіт для студентів напряму підготовки 6.080101 Геодезія, картографія та землеустрій

Розглянуто теоретичні відомості про ключові питання інженерно- геодезичного проектування будівель та споруд, геодезичну підготовку даних для винесення проекту в натуру та визначення деформації споруд й поверхні зсувних схилів. Подано також рекомендації до розв’язування типових практичних задач з аналітичного розрахунку розмічувальних елементів різноманітними способами для винесення основних точок проекту в натуру, оцінювання точності їхнього положення залежно від способу розмічування та визначення деформації поверхні зсувних схилів. Наведено питання для самостійного оцінювання модульного контролю виконання лабораторних робіт. Орієнтовано на активізацію виконавчого етапу навчальної діяльності студентів

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world

Dissecting work commitment: the role of Machiavellianism

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to refine the concept of work commitment by proposing a dissociation between self‐related work commitment (namely, employees' career commitment) and other‐related work commitment (pertaining more strongly to others such as team members or supervisors). The dissociation is demonstrated empirically through the differential predictive validity of Machiavellianism, which holds when the influence of broad personality dimensions is controlled for.Design/methodology/approachPersonality characteristics (Machiavellianism and the six factors of the HEXACO model of personality) as well as organizational, supervisor, team, and career commitment of 154 employees were assessed via self‐reports.FindingsResults support the hypotheses that Machiavellianism is related positively to self‐related work commitment (career commitment) and negatively to other‐related work commitment (organizational, supervisor, and team commitment), and explains unique variance in all criteria above the six broad dimensions of personality.Originality/valueAlthough meta‐analyses have indicated strong overlaps between diverse work commitment foci, it is argued and shown that there are core differences between self‐related career commitment and other‐related commitment foci. Additionally, Machiavellianism as well as the HEXACO dimensions are investigated as predictors of work commitment foci for the first time.</jats:sec