95 research outputs found
Democratic leadership: a charming solution for nursingâs legitimacy crisis
Editorial regarding democratic leadership for nursing
Report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment on the motions for resolutions concerning the economic, social and vocational integration of disabled people in the European Community with particular reference to the International Year of Disabled Persons 1981, Working Documents 1980-1981, Document 1-868/80, 20 February 1981
Collecting Contemporary Ceramics
Exhibition and collection of Essays featuring artists that have work in the National Ceramics Collection in the National Museum of Wales in Cardiff
Canonising the Shakespeare apocrypha: Shakespeare, Middleton and co-existent canons
The Shakespeare Apocrypha has persisted as a category for plays of dubious authorship since 1908. Despite recent calls for this group to be dissolved, it persists as the âotherâ of the Shakespeare canon. The definition of the plays as a collectively excluded canon leads to their relative obscurity in print and on stage. Yet recent calls for the adoption of different kinds of dramatic canon present a means of reintegrating canon and apocrypha. The new Middleton Collected Works offers a model for âco-existent canonsâ which share plays and disperse the authority of fixed authorial canons, allowing the plays of the Shakespeare Apocrypha to be read and seen in new, productive contexts
What Does It Mean to Be a College Student for Youth with Intellectual Disabilities? : A Survey on Department of Rehabilitation Independence of Korea Nazarene University
<strong>Background:</strong> Governments in several countries are facing problems concerning the accountability of regulators in health care. Questions have been raised about how patientsâ complaints should be valued in the regulatory process. However, it is not known what patients who made complaints expect to achieve in the process of health-care quality regulation.
<strong>Objective:</strong> To assess expectations and experiences of patients who complained to the regulator. Design Interviews were conducted with 11 people, and a questionnaire was submitted to 343 people who complained to the Dutch Health-care Inspectorate. The Inspectorate handled 92 of those complaints. This decision was based on the idea that the Inspectorate should only deal with complaints that relate to âstructural and severeâ problems.
<strong>Results:</strong> The response rate was 54%. Self-reported severity of physical injury of complaints that were not handled was significantly lower than of complaints that were. Most respondents felt that their complaint indicated a structural and severe problem that the Inspectorate should act upon. The desire for penalties or personal satisfaction played a lesser role. Only a minority felt that their complaint had led to improvements in health-care quality.
<strong>Conclusions:</strong> Patients and the regulator share a common goal: improving health-care quality. However, patientsâ perceptions of the complaintsâ relevance differ from the regulatorâs perceptions. Regulators should favour more responsive approaches, going beyond assessing against exclusively clinical standards to identify the range of social problems associated with complaints about health care. Long-term learning commitment through public participation mechanisms can enhance accountability and improve the detection of problems in health care. (aut. ref.
A meta-ethnography of the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of patient complaints processes in health-care settings
Objective: To synthesize experiences of the patient complaints process for patients and health-care professionals to identify facilitators and barriers in the successful implementation of patient complaints processes. This will assist the development of cultural change programmes, enabling complaints managers to incorporate stakeholder perspectives into future care. Design: Systematic literature search and meta-ethnography, comprising reciprocal syntheses of âpatientâ and âprofessionalâ qualitative studies, combined to form a âline-of-argumentâ embodying both perspectives. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO (database inception to April 2015) were searched to identify international literature in primary and secondary health-care settings, involving qualitative data collection and analysis. Further studies were identified from hand-searching relevant journals, contacting authors, article reference lists and Google Scholar. Results: A total of 13 papers, reporting 9 studies from the United Kingdom, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand, were included in the synthesis. Facilitators and barriers to the successful implementation of patient complaints processes were identified across the perspectives of both patients and health-care professionals. Patients sought to individualize the complaints process by targeting specific professionals who engaged in practices that undermined the identity of patients. In contrast, professionals obscured their own individualism through maintaining a collective identity and withholding personal judgement in relation to patient complaints. Conclusions: Complainants recognized health-care professionals as bearers of individual accountability for unsatisfactory care, in opposition to the stance of collective responsibility endorsed by professionals. Implementation of patient complaints processes must reconcile the need for individualized resolution, whilst striving to improve the future provision of health care through a collaborative approach between patients and professionals.</p
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study
Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28â2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65â3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3â5 versus grades 1â2 (2·35 [1·57â3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01â2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06â2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01â2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research
Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: The pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial
Summary:
Background Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy are more eff ective than similar postoperative
treatment for oesophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers, perhaps because of more eff ective micrometastasis eradication
and reduced risk of incomplete excision and tumour cell shedding during surgery. The FOxTROT trial aims to
investigate the feasibility, safety, and effi cacy of preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer.
Methods In the pilot stage of this randomised controlled trial, 150 patients with radiologically staged locally advanced
(T3 with â„5 mm invasion beyond the muscularis propria or T4) tumours from 35 UK centres were randomly
assigned (2:1) to preoperative (three cycles of OxMdG [oxaliplatin 85 mg/mÂČ, l-folinic acid 175 mg, fl uorouracil
400 mg/mÂČ bolus, then 2400 mg/mÂČ by 46 h infusion] repeated at 2-weekly intervals followed by surgery and a
further nine cycles of OxMdG) or standard postoperative chemotherapy (12 cycles of OxMdG). Patients with KRAS
wild-type tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive panitumumab (6 mg/kg; every 2 weeks with the fi rst
6 weeks of chemotherapy) or not. Treatment allocation was through a central randomisation service using a
minimised randomisation procedure including age, radiological T and N stage, site of tumour, and presence of
defunctioning colostomy as stratifi cation variables. Primary outcome measures of the pilot phase were feasibility,
safety, and tolerance of preoperative therapy, and accuracy of radiological staging. Analysis was by intention to treat.
This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 87163246.
Findings 96% (95 of 99) of patients started and 89% (85 of 95) completed preoperative chemotherapy with grade 3â4
gastrointestinal toxicity in 7% (seven of 94) of patients. All 99 tumours in the preoperative group were resected, with
no signifi cant diff erences in postoperative morbidity between the preoperative and control groups: 14% (14 of 99)
versus 12% (six of 51) had complications prolonging hospital stay (p=0·81). 98% (50 of 51) of postoperative
chemotherapy patients had T3 or more advanced tumours confi rmed at post-resection pathology compared with 91%
(90 of 99) of patients following preoperative chemotherapy (p=0·10). Preoperative therapy resulted in signifi cant
downstaging of TNM5 compared with the postoperative group (p=0·04), including two pathological complete
responses, apical node involvement (1% [one of 98] vs 20% [ten of 50], p<0·0001), resection margin involvement (4%
[ four of 99] vs 20% [ten of 50], p=0·002), and blinded centrally scored tumour regression grading: 31% (29 of 94) vs 2%
(one of 46) moderate or greater regression (p=0·0001).
Interpretation Preoperative chemotherapy for radiologically staged, locally advanced operable primary colon cancer is
feasible with acceptable toxicity and perioperative morbidity. Proceeding to the phase 3 trial, to establish whether the
encouraging pathological responses seen with preoperative therapy translates into improved long-term oncological
outcome, is appropriate
- âŠ