Severe preterm preeclampsia - associated posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinical syndrome which causes non-specific neurological symptoms such as visual impairment (cortical blindness, diplopia, hemianopia), acute headaches, seizures (focal or general tonic-clonic), vomiting, altered mental status, focal neurologic deficit as a complication of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia is a serious complication specific for pregnancy, characterized by hypertension (systolic > 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic > 90 mm Hg) and proteinuria (> 300 mg u 24-h urine sample , > 1 +) at or after 20th week of gestation. It is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. We present a 38-year-old pregnant woman, gravida 1 para 0 with PRES which was manifested on the second day after delivery by Cesarean section at 32 weeks of gestation with aphasia and blindness caused by severe preeclampsia. We confirmed the diagnosis by MRI which revealed white matter edema in the posterior cerebral area in a symmetric fashion, hyper intense cortical foci in the right occipital lobe and punctiform lesions in the bilateral occipital lobe. We treated her promptly in the intensive care unit (ICU) with antihypertensive and anticonvulsant therapy after which she fully recovered. PRES should always be kept in mind when a patient in the postpartum period develops one of the above symptoms. If timely recognized and promptly treated, full recover usually follows

Management of fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia - case report

The conduction system of the fetal heart is defined by the16th week of gestation when it matures and normally produces a regular rhythm and rate between 110 and 160 beats per minute (bpm) for the remainder of the pregnancy. Deviations from these parameters are fetal arrhythmias. They are diagnosed in 2% of unselected pregnancies. They are mostly benign and transient but some of them are persistent and associated with structural defects or can cause heart failure, fetal hydrops and intrauterine death. Routine prenatal care includes screening for fetal arrhythmias in the second and third trimester with fetal ultrasound examinations which include a view of the four cardiac chambers and both ventricular outflow tracts. The fetal outcomes are improved upon appropriate antepartum diagnosis and care. Here we present a pregnancy and multidisciplinary management, prenatal evaluation and intervention with maternal transplacental treatment of a 28-year-old female, gravida II, para II, in 28+5 weeks of gestation with fetal arrhythmia, in tertiary university hospital. She had a history of previous caesarean section, in the 40th week of gestation due to an infection of the synus pylonidalis. We confirmed suspected fetal arrhythmia as supraventricular tachyarrhythmia without fetal hydrops, based on the ultrasound doppler M mode imaging, and started transplacental administration of antiarrhythmyc agent, digoxin. It has been considered the first line agent for treatment of fetal supraventricular tachycardia but higher maternal doses are required to maintain a therapeutic serum level. We converted fetal heartbeat into normal sinus rhythm after three days of administration of digoxin. We continued to monitor the fetus once a week with controlling levels of digoxin and electrolytes in maternal blood until the end of the pregnancy at 38+6 weeks of gestation

Multidisciplinary approach in the management of pregnancy with placenta accreta spectrum disorder - Case report

From the histopathologic perspective Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) shows the absence of the normal intervening decidua and invasion of the placenta into the myometrium. There is placenta accreta with the chorionic villi attach directly to the surface of the myometrium in the absence of the decidual layer and placenta increta when the chorionic villi penetrate deeply into the myometrium reaching the external layer. There is also placenta percreta where the invasive chorionic villi reach and penetrate through the myometrium to uterine serosa and it is nowadays the most common reason for peripartum hysterectomy (1). Drawing the line between these subtypes is not always easy, especially in the clinical situations when the invasiveness of the placenta is not known before the delivery (2). The maternal and fetal outcomes are improved upon appropriate antepartum diagnosis and care by multidisciplinary experts with experience in PAS treatment (3). Here we present a pregnancy and multidisciplinary delivery management of a 40-year-old female, gravida V, para IV, with history of the three cesarean sections, in 36+2 weeks of gestation in a tertiary academic teaching hospital. We confirmed suspected PAS antenatally based on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Preoperative preparation included the ensuring of blood products availability, the use of arterial occlusion balloons to reduce hemorrhage, and the use of double JJ stent to prevent ureteral injuries. We performed a cesarean section with immediate uterine amputation due to severe bleeding, after which the patient fully recovered. If PAS timely suspected and confirmed intraoperatively, the best maternal and neonatal outcome is achieved by the multidisciplinary approach that enables adequate elective procedure

The psychological science accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterization, and demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73,223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore coping, framing, and self-determination across a diverse, global sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data

In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

The COVID-19 pandemic (and its aftermath) highlights a critical need to communicate health information effectively to the global public. Given that subtle differences in information framing can have meaningful effects on behavior, behavioral science research highlights a pressing question: Is it more effective to frame COVID-19 health messages in terms of potential losses (e.g., "If you do not practice these steps, you can endanger yourself and others") or potential gains (e.g., "If you practice these steps, you can protect yourself and others")? Collecting data in 48 languages from 15,929 participants in 84 countries, we experimentally tested the effects of message framing on COVID-19-related judgments, intentions, and feelings. Loss- (vs. gain-) framed messages increased self-reported anxiety among participants cross-nationally with little-to-no impact on policy attitudes, behavioral intentions, or information seeking relevant to pandemic risks. These results were consistent across 84 countries, three variations of the message framing wording, and 560 data processing and analytic choices. Thus, results provide an empirical answer to a global communication question and highlight the emotional toll of loss-framed messages. Critically, this work demonstrates the importance of considering unintended affective consequences when evaluating nudge-style interventions

A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic

Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges

The Psychological Science Accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterization, and demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73,223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore coping, framing, and self-determination across a diverse, global sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data

A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased negative emotions and decreased positive emotions globally. Left unchecked, these emotional changes might have a wide array of adverse impacts. To reduce negative emotions and increase positive emotions, we tested the effectiveness of reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation. Participants from 87 countries and regions (n = 21,644) were randomly assigned to one of two brief reappraisal interventions (reconstrual or repurposing) or one of two control conditions (active or passive). Results revealed that both reappraisal interventions (vesus both control conditions) consistently reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions across different measures. Reconstrual and repurposing interventions had similar effects. Importantly, planned exploratory analyses indicated that reappraisal interventions did not reduce intentions to practice preventive health behaviours. The findings demonstrate the viability of creating scalable, low-cost interventions for use around the world