26 research outputs found
Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients
Risk factors for Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) death in a population cohort study from the Western Cape province, South Africa
Risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) death in sub-Saharan Africa and the effects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis on COVID-19 outcomes are unknown. We conducted a population cohort study using linked data from adults attending public-sector health facilities in the
Western Cape, South Africa. We used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, location, and comorbidities, to examine the associations between HIV, tuberculosis, and COVID-19 death from 1 March to 9 June 2020 among (1) public-sector âactive patientsâ (â„1 visit in the 3 years before March 2020); (2) laboratory-diagnosed COVID-19 cases; and (3) hospitalized COVID-19
cases. We calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for COVID-19, comparing adults living with and without HIV using
modeled population estimates.Among 3 460 932 patients (16% living with HIV), 22 308 were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 625 died. COVID19 death was associated with male sex, increasing age, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. HIV was associated with
COVID-19 mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70â2.70), with similar risks across strata of
viral loads and immunosuppression. Current and previous diagnoses of tuberculosis were associated with COVID-19 death (aHR,
2.70 [95% CI, 1.81â4.04] and 1.51 [95% CI, 1.18â1.93], respectively). The SMR for COVID-19 death associated with HIV was 2.39
(95% CI, 1.96â2.86); population attributable fraction 8.5% (95% CI, 6.1â11.1)
Rate Coefficients for Intramolecular Homolytic Substitution of Oxyacyl Radicals at Sulfur
COVID-19 Concerns among Physicians who treat cancer survey in the United States, Cross-sectional study March/April 2020
We have provided the survey instrument, data, and the SAS program(s) which generate the calculated variables and statistical analyses as described in the manuscript(s). A. Filename: COVID19_us_oncologist_survey_data3.csv Short description: Data set B. Filename: COVID19AndOncologistsSurvey_REDCapSurvey.pdf Short Description: PDF of survey as presented to participants in REDCap online C. Filename: Covid19_oncologist_analysis_emot_health_final_UPLOAD.sas Short Description: SAS code (9.4) to generate variables and statistical analysis for Thomaier et al., 2020. NOTE: Variables dem_1, dem_3, dem_4, dem_5, and dem_17 have been removed from this public version of the dataset to protect participant privacy. These correspond to age, transgender status, race, ethnicity, and state of residence/practice. To obtain a complete raw dataset, please contact the lead investigator to be vetted for access to that data.Cross-sectional anonymous online survey among physicians treating individuals with cancer in the United States during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 27, 2020 â April 10, 2020).
Recruitment: Snowball convenience sampling through social media (Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn).
Eligibility criteria: â„18 years, able to read/write in English, and being a physician (MD or DO) currently residing and providing cancer treatment in the United States.
Data collected and stored in REDCap.This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Healthâs National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, grant UL1TR002494 as well as the National Cancer Institute P30 Cancer Center Support Grant, grant CA77598. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Healthâs National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences or the National Cancer Institute
Synthetic and Computational Studies of Acyl Radical Cyclizations with ÎČ-Alkoxyacrylates: Formal Synthesis of (±)-Longianone
Emotional health concerns of oncology physicians in the United States: Fallout during the COVID-19 pandemic.
IntroductionCancer care is significantly impacted by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Our objective was to evaluate the early effects of the pandemic on the emotional well-being of oncology providers across the United States and explore factors associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.Materials and methodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to United States cancer-care physicians recruited over a two-week period (3/27/2020-4/10/2020) using snowball-convenience sampling through social media. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4).ResultsOf 486 participants, 374 (77.0%) completed the PHQ-4: median age was 43 years; 63.2% female; all oncologic specialties were represented. The rates of anxiety and depression symptoms were 62.0% and 23.5%, respectively. Demographic factors associated with anxiety included female sex, younger age, and less time in clinical practice. Perception of inadequate personal protective equipment (68.6% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.03) and practicing in a state with more COVID-19 cases (65.8% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.01) were associated with anxiety symptoms. Factors significantly associated with both anxiety and depression included the degree to which COVID-19 has interfered with the ability to provide treatment to cancer patients and concern that patients will not receive the level of care needed for non-COVID-19 illness (all p-values ConclusionThe perceived degree of interference with clinical practice along with personal concerns about COVID-19 were significantly associated with both anxiety and depression among oncology physicians in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight factors associated with and sources of psychological distress to be addressed to protect the well-being of oncology physicians
Recommended from our members
Outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics associated with disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk early stage breast cancer: the I-SPY SURMOUNT study.
PURPOSE: Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) expressing epithelial markers in the bone marrow are associated with recurrence and death, but little is known about risk factors predicting their occurrence. We detected EPCAM+/CD45- cells in bone marrow from early stage breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the I-SPY 2 Trial and examined clinicopathologic factors and outcomes. METHODS: Patients who signed consent for SURMOUNT, a sub-study of the I-SPY 2 Trial (NCT01042379), had bone marrow collected after NAC at the time of surgery. EPCAM+CD45- cells in 4 mLs of bone marrow aspirate were enumerated using immunomagnetic enrichment/flow cytometry (IE/FC). Patients withâ>â4.16 EPCAM+CD45- cells per mL of bone marrow were classified as DTC-positive. Tumor response was assessed using the residual cancer burden (RCB), a standardized approach to quantitate the extent of residual invasive cancer present in the breast and the axillary lymph nodes after NAC. Association of DTC-positivity with clinicopathologic variables and survival was examined. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom had successful EPCAM+CD45- cell enumeration. Twenty-four of 51 (47.1%) were DTC-positive. The DTC-positivity rate was similar across receptor subtypes, but DTC-positive patients were significantly younger (pâ=â0.0239) and had larger pretreatment tumors compared to DTC-negative patients (pâ=â0.0319). Twenty of 51 (39.2%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). While DTC-positivity was not associated with achieving pCR, it was significantly associated with higher RCB class (RCB-II/III, 62.5% vs. RCB-0/I; 33.3%; Chi-squared pâ=â0.0373). No significant correlation was observed between DTC-positivity and distant recurrence-free survival (pâ=â0.38, median follow-upâ=â3.2 years). CONCLUSION: DTC-positivity at surgery after NAC was higher in younger patients, those with larger tumors, and those with residual disease at surgery