9 research outputs found
“Advancing Evidence-based Policy in Crisis Management: Field Survey Findings
This report presents preliminary findings from the field surveys conducted as part of the project led by AUB and funded by the National Endowment for Democracy: “Advancing Evidence-Based Policy in Crisis Management.” The project aims to monitor the impact of the multi-dimensional crises Lebanon is facing, on multiple economic sectors, and subsequently advance evidence-based policy reforms that respond to citizens’ priorities. For this purpose, the assessment carried out had two main objectives: (i) gathering information about the socio-economic impacts of the crisis, and (ii) data on coping mechanisms. This preliminary report will be followed by a more detailed final report containing analysis of qualitative and quantitative data collected through surveys and interviews. Studies have found that collecting more information (qualitative and quantitative) on households’ vulnerability to poverty could help inform policy. The final report will present a more comprehensive analysis and make some policy recommendations
A cross-linguistic study of the acquisition of clitic and pronoun production
This study develops a single elicitation method to test the acquisition of
third-person pronominal objects in 5-year-olds for 16 languages. This methodology
allows us to compare the acquisition of pronominals in languages
that lack object clitics (“pronoun languages”) with languages that employ
clitics in the relevant context (“clitic languages”), thus establishing a robust
cross-linguistic baseline in the domain of clitic and pronoun production for
5-year-olds. High rates of pronominal production are found in our results,
indicating that children have the relevant pragmatic knowledge required to
select a pronominal in the discourse setting involved in the experiment as
well as the relevant morphosyntactic knowledge involved in the production
of pronominals. It is legitimate to conclude from our data that a child who
at age 5 is not able to produce any or few pronominals is a child at risk for
language impairment. In this way, pronominal production can be taken as a
developmental marker, provided that one takes into account certain crosslinguistic
differences discussed in the article