Hybrid density functional study of band alignment in ZnO/GaN and ZnO/(Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx)/GaN heterostructures

The band alignment in ZnO/GaN and related heterostructures are crucial for the uses in solar harvesting technology. Here, we report our density functional calculations of the band alignment and optical properties of ZnO/GaN and ZnO/(Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx)/GaN heterostructures using a Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE) hybrid functional. We found that the conventional GGA functionals underestimate not only the band gap but also the band offset of these heterostructures. Using the hybrid functional calculations, we show that the (Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx) solid solution has a direct band gap of about 2.608 eV, in good agreement with the experimental data. More importantly, this solid solution forms type-II band alignment with the host materials. A GaN/(Ga1-xZnx)(N1-xOx)/ZnO core-shell solar cell model is presented to improve the visible light adsorption ability and carrier collection efficiency

Genetic differences and variation in polysaccharide antioxidant activity found in germplasm resources for Job’s tears (Coix lacryma-jobi L.)

Job’s tears (Coix lacryma-jobi L.) is an ancient plant with high nutritional and medicinal value. In this study, using 11 Chinese germplasm resources for Job’s tears, we examined genetic differences among the germplasms and differences in the in vitro antioxidant activities of coixan, and sought to identify inter-relationships between these two variables. We found that the intraspecific conservation of DNA sequences was high, with ITS regions and cpDNA trnL-F and trnH-psbA non-coding sequences showing no sequence variation, whereas the GBSSI gene showed a certain degree of variation among the different germplasms. EST-SSR analysis also revealed a relatively low level of genetic diversity among the germplasms. Coixan was shown to be an efficient antioxidant, and among the germplasms examined, the LNYX, FJPC, and AHBZ had the highest antioxidant activities. However, none of the four in vitro antioxidant activity indices we assessed were significantly correlated with the geographical origin of the germplasm (latitude and longitude); however, one of them was significantly associated with genetic diversity. Although the factors affecting the antioxidant activity of coixan are complex, the role of heredity should not be ignored. Our findings have implications for the scientific evaluation, identification, and sustainable utilization of the germplasm resources for Job’s tears.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author

Reversing tumor to “Hot”:A NIR light-triggered carrier-free nanoplatform for enhanced tumor penetration and photo-induced immunotherapy

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) process associated with phototherapy is a promising strategy to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis. To facilitate deep tumor-penetrating photo-immunotherapy, we herein report a near-infrared (NIR) light-triggered carrier-free nanoplatform (IR837) loaded with indocyanine green (ICG) and immune adjuvant R837. The IR837 nanoparticles were prepared as carrier-free nanoassembly and showed good photostability. With the thermal-responsive polydopamine as the shell, the IR837 (∼78 nm) can efficiently disassociate into smaller size (∼10 nm) under NIR irradiation. Through intravenous injection, IR837 displays prolonged blood circulation and turns into the smaller-sized nanoaggregates to deeply penetrate in the core sites of tumors. The ICD process is then induced and results in dendritic cells (DCs) maturation to initiate the immune response. Eventually, the “cold” tumor would be reversed into the “hot” tumor, promoting the immunotherapeutic outcomes against in-situ and distal tumors under mild temperature (45 °C). In summary, our research provides a prospective intelligent nanodelivery system to perform efficient photothermal immunotherapy against primary and distal tumor growth with hopefully low side effect

Synergetic Pyroptosis with Apoptosis Improving Phototherapy of Mitochondria-Targeted Cyanines with Superior Photostability

Pyroptosis has been reported to improve the antitumor effect by evoking a more intense immune response and a therapeutic effect. For phototherapy, several photosensitizers have been found to initiate pyroptosis. However, the effect of pyroptosis associated with apoptosis in enhancing the antitumor therapy needs sufficient characterization, especially under long-term treatment. As a NIR photosensitizer, heptamethine cyanines have been discovered for anticancer phototherapy for deep tissue penetration and inherent tumor-targeted capability. However, they are not quite stable for long-term performance. To investigate the effect of pyroptosis along with apoptosis on the anticancer immune responses and phototherapy, here, we chemically modulate the cyanine IR780 to regulate hydrophobicity, stability, and intracellular targeting. Two photosensitizers, T780T-TPP and T780T-TPP-C12, were finally optimized and showed excellent photostability with high photothermal conversion efficiency. Although the cellular uptake of the two molecules was both mediated by OATP transporters, T780T-TPP induced tumor cell death via pyroptosis and apoptosis and accumulated in tumor accumulation, while T780T-TPP-C12 was prone to accumulate in the liver. Ultimately, via one injection-multiple irradiation treatment protocol, T780T-TPP displayed a significant antitumor effect, even against the growth of large tumors (200 mm3)

Synergistic Release of Photothermal Molecules from Nanocarriers Induced by Light and Hyperthermia Benefits Efficient Anticancer Phototherapy

Recently, nanoformulations have been widely applied in the delivery of organic photothermal agents (OPTAs) for cancer therapy to prolong blood circulation or improve tumor-targeting capacity. However, the systematic evaluations of their effects on the photothermal behavior of OPTAs are limited, especially for different types of nanoparticle systems. Herein, we prepared two kinds of nanoparticles (BSA and PEG nanoparticles (NPs)) to load an OPTA, a cyanine photosensitizer (IR780-O-TPE), and investigated their photothermal response, organelle targeting, and in vivo therapeutic efficacy. Due to different assembly forms, the two NPs showed distinct morphological changes after exposure to laser or hyperthermia. Under laser irradiation at 808 nm, BSA NPs could release IR780-O-TPE more efficiently than PEG NPs. We speculate that this phenomenon is probably caused by dual-responsive release of IR780-O-TPE from BSA NPs against light and hyperthermia. Moreover, IR780-O-TPE/BSA NPs were highly mitochondria-targeting and therefore displayed significant inhibition of cell viability. In contrast, IR780-O-TPE/PEG NPs were “shell–core” nanostructures and more stable under laser stimulation. As a consequence, the mitochondria-targeting and anticancer photothermal therapy by IR780-O-TPE/PEG NPs was less obvious. This study revealed the significance of nanocarrier design for OPTA delivery and demonstrated that BSA NPs could release IR780-O-TPE more effectively for efficient photothermal therapy. We also believe that the dual-responsive release of OPTAs from NPs can provide an effective strategy to promote anticancer photothermal treatment

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field