199 research outputs found

    The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Background: Improving care for people with long-term conditions is central to NHS policy. It has been suggested that the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a pay-for-performance scheme in primary care that rewards practices for delivering effective interventions in the management of longterm conditions, does not encourage high quality care for this group of patients. Aim: To examine the evidence that the QOF has improved quality of care of patients with long-term conditions. Design Systematic review Method We used electronic databases to search for peer-reviewed empirical quantitative research on the QOF published since the schemeā€™s introduction in 2004. We searched for studies examining the effect of QOF on a broad range of processes and outcomes of care, including coordination and integration of care, holistic and personalised care, self-care, patient experience, physiological and biochemical outcomes, health service utilisation, and mortality. We carried out a narrative synthesis because the studies were heterogeneous. Results: The QOF was associated with a modest slowing of the increase in emergency admission rates, a modest slowing of the increase in consultation rates in severe mental illness, and modest improvements in certain aspects of the care of diabetes. The nature of the evidence means that we cannot be sure that any of these associations is causal. No clear effect on mortality has been demonstrated. We found no evidence to suggest that QOF influences, positively or negatively, integration or coordination of care, holistic or personalised care, self-care, or patientsā€™ experience, quality of life or satisfaction. Conclusion: The NHS should consider more broadly what constitutes high quality primary care for people with long-term conditions, and consider other ways of motivating primary care to deliver it

    Evaluation of a new model of care for people with complications of diabetic retinopathy : The EMERALD Study

    Get PDF
    Objectives The increasing diabetes prevalence and advent of new treatments for its major visual-threatening complications (diabetic macular edema [DME] and proliferative diabetic retinopathy [PDR]), which require frequent and life-long follow-up, have markedly increased hospital demands. Resulting delays in the evaluation/treatment of patients are leading to sight loss. Strategies to increase capacity of medical retina clinics are urgently needed. EMERALD tested diagnostic accuracy, acceptability and costs of a new health care pathway for people with previously treated DME/PDR. Design Prospective, multicentric, case-referent, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study, undertaken in 13 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants Adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes and previously successfully treated DME/PDR who, at the time of enrolment, had active or inactive disease. Methods A new health care pathway entailing multimodal imaging (spectral domain optical coherence tomography [SD-OCT] for DME, and 7-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] and ultra-wide-field fundus images [UWF] for PDR) interpreted by trained non-medical staff (ophthalmic graders) to detect re-activation of disease was compared with the current standard care (ophthalmologists face-to-face examination). Main outcome measures Primary outcome: sensitivity of the new pathway. Secondary outcomes: specificity; agreement between pathways; costs; acceptability; proportions requiring subsequent ophthalmologist assessment, unable to undergo imaging, with inadequate images/indeterminate findings. Results The new pathway had sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92-99%) and specificity of 31% (95% CI 23-40%) to detect DME. For PDR, sensitivity and specificity using 7-field ETDRS (85%, 95% CI 77-91%; 48%; 95% CI 41-56%, respectively) or UWF (83%, 95% CI 75-89%; 54%; 95% CI 46-61%, respectively) were comparable. For detection of high risk PDR sensitivity and specificity were higher when using UWF images (87%, 95% CI 78-93%; 49% 95% CI 42-56%, respectively for UWF, versus 80%, 95% CI 69-88%; 40% CI 34-47%, respectively, for 7-field ETDRS). Participants preferred ophthalmologistā€™s assessments; in their absence, wished immediate feedback by graders, maintaining periodic ophthalmologist evaluations. When compared with the current standard care, the new pathway could save Ā£1,390/100 DME visits and between Ā£461-Ā£1,189/100 PDR visits. Conclusion The new ophthalmic grader pathway has acceptable sensitivity and would release resources. Usersā€™ suggestions should guide implementatio

    Stress ocupacional e alteraĆ§Ć£o do Estatuto da Carreira Docente portuguĆŖs

    Get PDF
    Este estudo foi realizado com 1162 professores, tendo como objetivo analisar a experiĆŖncia de stress e a sĆ­ndrome de ā€œburnoutā€, antes a apĆ³s a alteraĆ§Ć£o do Estatuto da Carreira Docente em Portugal. Assim, foram efetuadas duas avaliaƧƵes em momentos temporais distintos, assumindo-se um plano transversal de recolha de dados (2004/2005, n=689 e 2008/2009, n=473). O protocolo de avaliaĆ§Ć£o incluiu medidas de fontes de stress (QuestionĆ”rio de Stress nos Professores, Gomes, Silva, Mourisco, Mota, & Montenegro, 2006) e de ā€œburnoutā€ (InventĆ”rio de ā€œBurnoutā€ de Maslach ā€“ VersĆ£o para Professores, Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1996; Maslach, Jackson, & Schwab, 1996, AdaptaĆ§Ć£o de Gomes et al., 2006). Os resultados indicaram que a experiĆŖncia de stress e de ā€œburnoutā€ aumentou entre as duas avaliaƧƵes, verificando-se em 2008/2009 aumentos em Ć”reas relacionadas com as pressƵes de tempo/excesso de trabalho e com o trabalho burocrĆ”tico/administrativo e, inversamente, diminuiƧƵes em Ć”reas relacionadas com as diferentes capacidades e motivaƧƵes dos alunos. Quanto Ć  prediĆ§Ć£o da sĆ­ndrome de ā€œburnoutā€, nĆ£o se verificaram alteraƧƵes substanciais nas variĆ”veis preditoras nos dois momentos. Em sĆ­ntese, os resultados indicaram aumentos nas exigĆŖncias profissionais dos professores, mas nĆ£o se pode afirmar que tal se deva Ć s alteraƧƵes do Estatuto da Carreira Docente uma vez que nĆ£o observĆ”mos alteraƧƵes no stress associado Ć  carreira docente.(undefined

    Perspectives in visual imaging for marine biology and ecology: from acquisition to understanding

    Get PDF
    Durden J, Schoening T, Althaus F, et al. Perspectives in Visual Imaging for Marine Biology and Ecology: From Acquisition to Understanding. In: Hughes RN, Hughes DJ, Smith IP, Dale AC, eds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. 54. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016: 1-72

    Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74Ā·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24Ā·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26Ā·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23Ā·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51Ā·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38Ā·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81Ā·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1Ā·75 [95% CI 1Ā·28ā€“2Ā·40], p\textless0Ā·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2Ā·30 [1Ā·65ā€“3Ā·22], p\textless0Ā·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3ā€“5 versus grades 1ā€“2 (2Ā·35 [1Ā·57ā€“3Ā·53], p\textless0Ā·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1Ā·55 [1Ā·01ā€“2Ā·39], p=0Ā·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1Ā·67 [1Ā·06ā€“2Ā·63], p=0Ā·026), and major versus minor surgery (1Ā·52 [1Ā·01ā€“2Ā·31], p=0Ā·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

    Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An international, multicenter, comparative cohort study

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity scoreā€“matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19ā€“free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks
    • ā€¦
    corecore