Plan museológico "Museo de la ciudad de Antequera": diagnóstico, programa arquitectónico y programa expositivo

El presente proyecto ha de ser entendido como una aproximación al Plan Museológico — herramienta esencial para la planificación y programación— propuesto por el Ministerio de Cultura a través de la Subdelegación General de Museos Estatales, como instrumento rector de la programación de los museos y como guía para el desarrollo de líneas de actuación estratégicas. A fecha de junio de 2014 el Museo de la Ciudad de Antequera no cuenta con una plan de actuación de carácter general sino con estudios parciales y sectoriales, como el Proyecto Museológico de la Sección de Arqueología realizado por D. Manuel Romero Pérez, o diversos planes destinados a la musealización de algunas salas, siendo el Proyecto de Creación presentado a la Junta de Andalucía en 1997 el que de momento desempeña esta función. En este sentido, el Proyecto Fin de Máster, elaborado durante la VII Edición del Máster de Museología de Granada, se concibe como una reflexión de carácter teórico, pero también como una herramienta de trabajo útil para solventar determinadas carencias y adecuar el Museo al desempeño de las funciones establecidas por el ICOM: conservación, investigación, exposición, comunicación y difusión. La realización de este trabajo —cuya práctica ha sido posible gracias al convenio establecido entre la Junta de Andalucía y el Museo de la Ciudad de Antequera en 2013—, ha supuesto la recopilación de material procedente del Archivo Histórico de Antequera, el Ayuntamiento de Antequera y el Museo de la Ciudad de Antequera, así como de la Dirección General de Instituciones Museísticas, Acción Cultural y Promoción del Arte dependiente de la Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte de la Junta de Andalucía, y cuantos quiera otros organismos e instituciones recogidos en la bibliografía, a los que agradecemos su colaboración.Proyecto Fin de Máster de Museología. VII edición 2013-14. Univ. Granada. Facultad de Bellas Arte

PhDAY 2020 -FOO (Facultad de Óptica y Optometría)

Por cuarto año consecutivo los doctorandos de la Facultad de Óptica y Optometría de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid cuentan con un congreso propio organizado por y para ellos, el 4º PhDAY- FOO. Se trata de un congreso gratuito abierto en la que estos jóvenes científicos podrán presentar sus investigaciones al resto de sus compañeros predoctorales y a toda la comunidad universitaria que quiera disfrutar de este evento. Apunta en tu agenda: el 15 de octubre de 2020. En esta ocasión será un Congreso On-line para evitar que la incertidumbre asociada a la pandemia Covid-19 pudiera condicionar su celebración

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission

Full integration of oncology and palliative care relies on the specific knowledge and skills of two modes of care: the tumour-directed approach, the main focus of which is on treating the disease; and the host-directed approach, which focuses on the patient with the disease. This Commission addresses how to combine these two paradigms to achieve the best outcome of patient care. Randomised clinical trials on integration of oncology and palliative care point to health gains: improved survival and symptom control, less anxiety and depression, reduced use of futile chemotherapy at the end of life, improved family satisfaction and quality of life, and improved use of health-care resources. Early delivery of patient-directed care by specialist palliative care teams alongside tumour-directed treatment promotes patient-centred care. Systematic assessment and use of patient-reported outcomes and active patient involvement in the decisions about cancer care result in better symptom control, improved physical and mental health, and better use of health-care resources. The absence of international agreements on the content and standards of the organisation, education, and research of palliative care in oncology are major barriers to successful integration. Other barriers include the common misconception that palliative care is end-of-life care only, stigmatisation of death and dying, and insufficient infrastructure and funding. The absence of established priorities might also hinder integration more widely. This Commission proposes the use of standardised care pathways and multidisciplinary teams to promote integration of oncology and palliative care, and calls for changes at the system level to coordinate the activities of professionals, and for the development and implementation of new and improved education programmes, with the overall goal of improving patient care. Integration raises new research questions, all of which contribute to improved clinical care. When and how should palliative care be delivered? What is the optimal model for integrated care? What is the biological and clinical effect of living with advanced cancer for years after diagnosis? Successful integration must challenge the dualistic perspective of either the tumour or the host, and instead focus on a merged approach that places the patient's perspective at the centre. To succeed, integration must be anchored by management and policy makers at all levels of health care, followed by adequate resource allocation, a willingness to prioritise goals and needs, and sustained enthusiasm to help generate support for better integration. This integrated model must be reflected in international and national cancer plans, and be followed by developments of new care models, education and research programmes, all of which should be adapted to the specific cultural contexts within which they are situated. Patient-centred care should be an integrated part of oncology care independent of patient prognosis and treatment intention. To achieve this goal it must be based on changes in professional cultures and priorities in health care

Características clínico epidemiológicas de pacientes con infarto miocárdico agudo

Introducción: la cardiopatía isquémica, y entre estas el Infarto Agudo del Miocardio con elevación del segmento ST, es la primera causa de muerte a nivel mundial. Objetivo: describir las características clínico epidemiológicas de pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio de la unidad de cuidados coronarios del Hospital General Docente Abel Santamaría Cuadrado de Pinar del Río, en 2011 y 2012. Material y Método: estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo transversal; universo 644 pacientes ingresados con elevación del ST. Los datos se tomaron de las historias clínicas. Resultados: 62% tenían entre 60- 79 años. 84.5% de los pacientes entre 30 y 49 años eran hombres. 81,6% fumaba y el 45,5% era diabético. La localización topográfica del infarto fue: inferior el 70,8%, anterior el 22,9% y anterior extensa el 6,2% de los pacientes. Como complicación, la arritmia se presentó en el 34% de los pacientes, la insuficiencia cardiaca en el 14,9% y la muerte en 7,7%. El 68,5% de los pacientes con arritmias tuvo fibrilación auricular. La trombolisis se empleó en el 55,2% de los pacientes apareciendo, entre las complicaciones, la hipotensión en el 30,7%. Conclusiones: el infarto miocárdico agudo fue más frecuente en pacientes de mayor edad, siendo antes de los 50 años cinco veces más frecuente entre los hombres. Los factores de riesgo más representados fueron el hábito de fumar y la diabetes mellitus. La localización más frecuente fue la inferior y la complicación las arritmias y dentro de estas la fibrilación auricular. La trombolisis se complica principalmente con hipotensión, pudiendo ser más empleada

Reduction of cardiac imaging tests during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Italy. Findings from the IAEA Non-invasive Cardiology Protocol Survey on COVID-19 (INCAPS COVID)

Background: In early 2020, COVID-19 massively hit Italy, earlier and harder than any other European country. This caused a series of strict containment measures, aimed at blocking the spread of the pandemic. Healthcare delivery was also affected when resources were diverted towards care of COVID-19 patients, including intensive care wards. Aim of the study: The aim is assessing the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac imaging in Italy, compare to the Rest of Europe (RoE) and the World (RoW). Methods: A global survey was conducted in May–June 2020 worldwide, through a questionnaire distributed online. The survey covered three periods: March and April 2020, and March 2019. Data from 52 Italian centres, a subset of the 909 participating centres from 108 countries, were analyzed. Results: In Italy, volumes decreased by 67% in March 2020, compared to March 2019, as opposed to a significantly lower decrease (p &lt; 0.001) in RoE and RoW (41% and 40%, respectively). A further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 summed up to 76% for the North, 77% for the Centre and 86% for the South. When compared to the RoE and RoW, this further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 in Italy was significantly less (p = 0.005), most likely reflecting the earlier effects of the containment measures in Italy, taken earlier than anywhere else in the West. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic massively hit Italy and caused a disruption of healthcare services, including cardiac imaging studies. This raises concern about the medium- and long-term consequences for the high number of patients who were denied timely diagnoses and the subsequent lifesaving therapies and procedures

International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified. Objectives: The study sought to assess COVID-19's impact on global cardiovascular diagnostic procedural volumes and safety practices. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes and safety practices resulting from COVID-19. Noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing volumes were obtained from participating sites for March and April 2020 and compared with those from March 2019. Availability of personal protective equipment and pandemic-related testing practice changes were ascertained. Results: Surveys were submitted from 909 inpatient and outpatient centers performing cardiac diagnostic procedures, in 108 countries. Procedure volumes decreased 42% from March 2019 to March 2020, and 64% from March 2019 to April 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography decreased by 59%, transesophageal echocardiography 76%, and stress tests 78%, which varied between stress modalities. Coronary angiography (invasive or computed tomography) decreased 55% (p &lt; 0.001 for each procedure). In multivariable regression, significantly greater reduction in procedures occurred for centers in countries with lower gross domestic product. Location in a low-income and lower–middle-income country was associated with an additional 22% reduction in cardiac procedures and less availability of personal protective equipment and telehealth. Conclusions: COVID-19 was associated with a significant and abrupt reduction in cardiovascular diagnostic testing across the globe, especially affecting the world's economically challenged. Further study of cardiovascular outcomes and COVID-19–related changes in care delivery is warranted