12,515 research outputs found
Metaheuristic design of feedforward neural networks: a review of two decades of research
Over the past two decades, the feedforward neural network (FNN) optimization has been a key interest among the researchers and practitioners of multiple disciplines. The FNN optimization is often viewed from the various perspectives: the optimization of weights, network architecture, activation nodes, learning parameters, learning environment, etc. Researchers adopted such different viewpoints mainly to improve the FNN's generalization ability. The gradient-descent algorithm such as backpropagation has been widely applied to optimize the FNNs. Its success is evident from the FNN's application to numerous real-world problems. However, due to the limitations of the gradient-based optimization methods, the metaheuristic algorithms including the evolutionary algorithms, swarm intelligence, etc., are still being widely explored by the researchers aiming to obtain generalized FNN for a given problem. This article attempts to summarize a broad spectrum of FNN optimization methodologies including conventional and metaheuristic approaches. This article also tries to connect various research directions emerged out of the FNN optimization practices, such as evolving neural network (NN), cooperative coevolution NN, complex-valued NN, deep learning, extreme learning machine, quantum NN, etc. Additionally, it provides interesting research challenges for future research to cope-up with the present information processing era
Is "Better Data" Better than "Better Data Miners"? (On the Benefits of Tuning SMOTE for Defect Prediction)
We report and fix an important systematic error in prior studies that ranked
classifiers for software analytics. Those studies did not (a) assess
classifiers on multiple criteria and they did not (b) study how variations in
the data affect the results. Hence, this paper applies (a) multi-criteria tests
while (b) fixing the weaker regions of the training data (using SMOTUNED, which
is a self-tuning version of SMOTE). This approach leads to dramatically large
increases in software defect predictions. When applied in a 5*5
cross-validation study for 3,681 JAVA classes (containing over a million lines
of code) from open source systems, SMOTUNED increased AUC and recall by 60% and
20% respectively. These improvements are independent of the classifier used to
predict for quality. Same kind of pattern (improvement) was observed when a
comparative analysis of SMOTE and SMOTUNED was done against the most recent
class imbalance technique. In conclusion, for software analytic tasks like
defect prediction, (1) data pre-processing can be more important than
classifier choice, (2) ranking studies are incomplete without such
pre-processing, and (3) SMOTUNED is a promising candidate for pre-processing.Comment: 10 pages + 2 references. Accepted to International Conference of
Software Engineering (ICSE), 201
Is "Better Data" Better than "Better Data Miners"? (On the Benefits of Tuning SMOTE for Defect Prediction)
We report and fix an important systematic error in prior studies that ranked
classifiers for software analytics. Those studies did not (a) assess
classifiers on multiple criteria and they did not (b) study how variations in
the data affect the results. Hence, this paper applies (a) multi-criteria tests
while (b) fixing the weaker regions of the training data (using SMOTUNED, which
is a self-tuning version of SMOTE). This approach leads to dramatically large
increases in software defect predictions. When applied in a 5*5
cross-validation study for 3,681 JAVA classes (containing over a million lines
of code) from open source systems, SMOTUNED increased AUC and recall by 60% and
20% respectively. These improvements are independent of the classifier used to
predict for quality. Same kind of pattern (improvement) was observed when a
comparative analysis of SMOTE and SMOTUNED was done against the most recent
class imbalance technique. In conclusion, for software analytic tasks like
defect prediction, (1) data pre-processing can be more important than
classifier choice, (2) ranking studies are incomplete without such
pre-processing, and (3) SMOTUNED is a promising candidate for pre-processing.Comment: 10 pages + 2 references. Accepted to International Conference of
Software Engineering (ICSE), 201
Model Selection for Support Vector Machine Classification
We address the problem of model selection for Support Vector Machine (SVM)
classification. For fixed functional form of the kernel, model selection
amounts to tuning kernel parameters and the slack penalty coefficient . We
begin by reviewing a recently developed probabilistic framework for SVM
classification. An extension to the case of SVMs with quadratic slack penalties
is given and a simple approximation for the evidence is derived, which can be
used as a criterion for model selection. We also derive the exact gradients of
the evidence in terms of posterior averages and describe how they can be
estimated numerically using Hybrid Monte Carlo techniques. Though
computationally demanding, the resulting gradient ascent algorithm is a useful
baseline tool for probabilistic SVM model selection, since it can locate maxima
of the exact (unapproximated) evidence. We then perform extensive experiments
on several benchmark data sets. The aim of these experiments is to compare the
performance of probabilistic model selection criteria with alternatives based
on estimates of the test error, namely the so-called ``span estimate'' and
Wahba's Generalized Approximate Cross-Validation (GACV) error. We find that all
the ``simple'' model criteria (Laplace evidence approximations, and the Span
and GACV error estimates) exhibit multiple local optima with respect to the
hyperparameters. While some of these give performance that is competitive with
results from other approaches in the literature, a significant fraction lead to
rather higher test errors. The results for the evidence gradient ascent method
show that also the exact evidence exhibits local optima, but these give test
errors which are much less variable and also consistently lower than for the
simpler model selection criteria
Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures
Learning algorithms related to artificial neural networks and in particular
for Deep Learning may seem to involve many bells and whistles, called
hyper-parameters. This chapter is meant as a practical guide with
recommendations for some of the most commonly used hyper-parameters, in
particular in the context of learning algorithms based on back-propagated
gradient and gradient-based optimization. It also discusses how to deal with
the fact that more interesting results can be obtained when allowing one to
adjust many hyper-parameters. Overall, it describes elements of the practice
used to successfully and efficiently train and debug large-scale and often deep
multi-layer neural networks. It closes with open questions about the training
difficulties observed with deeper architectures
- …