190 research outputs found

    Improvement of Carbon Nanofibers/ZrO2 Composites Properties with a Zirconia Nanocoating on Carbon Nanofibers by Sol–Gel Method

    Full text link
    The development of new carbon nanofibers (CNFs)–ceramic nanocomposite materials with excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties is interesting for a wide range of industrial applications. Among the ceramic materials, zirconia stands out for their excellent mechanical properties. The main limitations in the preparation of this kind of nanocomposites are related with the difficulty in obtaining materials with homogeneous distribution of both phases and the dissimilar properties of CNFs and ZrO2 which causes poor interaction between them. CNFs-reinforced zirconia nanocomposites ZrO2/xCNFs (x=1–20 vol%) were prepared by powder mixture and sintered by spark plasma sintering (SPS). ZrO2-reinforced CNFs nanocomposites CNFs/xZrO2 (x=20 vol%) were prepared by powder mixture and a surface coating of CNFs by the wet chemical route with zirconia precursor is proposed as a very effective way to improve the interaction between CNFs and ZrO2. After SPS sintering, an improvement of 50% in fracture strength was found for similar nanocomposite compositions when the surface coating was used. The improved mechanical properties of these nanocomposites are caused by stronger interaction between the CNFs and ZrO2.This work was financially supported by National Plan Projects MAT2006-01783 and MAT2007-30989-E and the Regional Project FICYT PC07-021. A. Borrell, acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for her research grant BES2007-15033.Borrell Tomás, MA.; Rocha, VG.; Torrecillas, R.; Fernandez, A. (2011). Improvement of Carbon Nanofibers/ZrO2 Composites Properties with a Zirconia Nanocoating on Carbon Nanofibers by Sol–Gel Method. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 94(7):2048-2052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04354.xS20482052947Iijima, S. (1991). Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 354(6348), 56-58. doi:10.1038/354056a0Merkoçi, A. (2005). Carbon Nanotubes in Analytical Sciences. Microchimica Acta, 152(3-4), 157-174. doi:10.1007/s00604-005-0439-zUchida, T., Anderson, D. P., Minus, M. L., & Kumar, S. (2006). Morphology and modulus of vapor grown carbon nano fibers. Journal of Materials Science, 41(18), 5851-5856. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0324-0Hvizdoš, P., Puchý, V., Duszová, A., & Dusza, J. (2010). Tribological behavior of carbon nanofiber–zirconia composite. Scripta Materialia, 63(2), 254-257. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.069Balázsi, C., Kónya, Z., Wéber, F., Biró, L. P., & Arató, P. (2003). Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotube reinforced silicon nitride composites. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 23(6-8), 1133-1137. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2003.09.085Tatami, J., Katashima, T., Komeya, K., Meguro, T., & Wakihara, T. (2005). Electrically Conductive CNT-Dispersed Silicon Nitride Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 88(10), 2889-2893. doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00539.xHirota, K., Hara, H., & Kato, M. (2007). Mechanical properties of simultaneously synthesized and consolidated carbon nanofiber (CNF)-dispersed SiC composites by pulsed electric-current pressure sintering. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 458(1-2), 216-225. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.065Dusza, J., Blugan, G., Morgiel, J., Kuebler, J., Inam, F., Peijs, T., … Puchy, V. (2009). Hot pressed and spark plasma sintered zirconia/carbon nanofiber composites. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 29(15), 3177-3184. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.05.030Lee, S.-Y., Kim, H., McIntyre, P. C., Saraswat, K. C., & Byun, J.-S. (2003). Atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 on W for metal–insulator–metal capacitor application. Applied Physics Letters, 82(17), 2874-2876. doi:10.1063/1.1569985Kobayashi, S., & Kawai, W. (2007). Development of carbon nanofiber reinforced hydroxyapatite with enhanced mechanical properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 38(1), 114-123. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.006Sun, J., Gao, L., Iwasa, M., Nakayama, T., & Niihara, K. (2005). Failure investigation of carbon nanotube/3Y-TZP nanocomposites. Ceramics International, 31(8), 1131-1134. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.11.010Ukai, T., Sekino, T., Hirvonen, A. T., Tanaka, N., Kusunose, T., Nakayama, T., & Niihara, K. (2006). Preparation and Electrical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Dispersed Zirconia Nanocomposites. Key Engineering Materials, 317-318, 661-664. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.317-318.661Duszová, A., Dusza, J., Tomášek, K., Morgiel, J., Blugan, G., & Kuebler, J. (2008). Zirconia/carbon nanofiber composite. Scripta Materialia, 58(6), 520-523. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.002Wang, X., Padture, N. P., & Tanaka, H. (2004). Contact-damage-resistant ceramic/single-wall carbon nanotubes and ceramic/graphite composites. Nature Materials, 3(8), 539-544. doi:10.1038/nmat1161Zhan, G.-D., Kuntz, J. D., Garay, J. E., & Mukherjee, A. K. (2003). Electrical properties of nanoceramics reinforced with ropes of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters, 83(6), 1228-1230. doi:10.1063/1.1600511Yucheng, W., & Zhengyi, F. (2002). Study of temperature field in spark plasma sintering. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 90(1-2), 34-37. doi:10.1016/s0921-5107(01)00780-2Haase, F., & Sauer, J. (1998). The Surface Structure of Sulfated Zirconia:  Periodic ab Initio Study of Sulfuric Acid Adsorbed on ZrO2(101) and ZrO2(001). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 120(51), 13503-13512. doi:10.1021/ja9825534Matsui, K., Suzuki, H., Ohgai, M., & Arashi, H. (1995). Raman Spectroscopic Studies on the Formation Mechanism of Hydrous-Zirconia Fine Particles. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 78(1), 146-152. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08374.xGateshki, M., Petkov, V., Williams, G., Pradhan, S. K., & Ren, Y. (2005). Atomic-scale structure of nanocrystallineZrO2prepared by high-energy ball milling. Physical Review B, 71(22). doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.224107Pyda, W., Haberko, K., & Bulko, M. M. (1991). Hydrothermal Crystallization of Zirconia and Zirconia Solid Solutions. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 74(10), 2622-2629. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06810.xDell’Agli, G., & Mascolo, G. (2000). Hydrothermal synthesis of ZrO2–Y2O3 solid solutions at low temperature. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 20(2), 139-145. doi:10.1016/s0955-2219(99)00151-xTai, C. Y., Hsiao, B.-Y., & Chiu, H.-Y. (2007). Preparation of silazane grafted yttria-stabilized zirconia nanocrystals via water/CTAB/hexanol reverse microemulsion. Materials Letters, 61(3), 834-836. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.068Tai, C. Y., Lee, M.-H., & Wu, Y.-C. (2001). Control of zirconia particle size by using two-emulsion precipitation technique. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(7), 2389-2398. doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(00)00454-1Tai, C. Y., & Hsiao, B.-Y. (2005). CHARACTERIZATION OF ZIRCONIA POWDER SYNTHESIZED VIA REVERSE MICROEMULSION PRECIPITATION. Chemical Engineering Communications, 192(11), 1525-1540. doi:10.1080/009864490896133Ci, L., Wei, J., Wei, B., Liang, J., Xu, C., & Wu, D. (2001). Carbon nanofibers and single-walled carbon nanotubes prepared by the floating catalyst method. Carbon, 39(3), 329-335. doi:10.1016/s0008-6223(00)00126-3Choi, S. R., & Bansal, N. P. (s. f.). Alumina-Reinforced Zirconia Composites. Handbook of Ceramic Composites, 437-457. doi:10.1007/0-387-23986-3_18Li, W., & Gao, L. (2000). Rapid sintering of nanocrystalline ZrO2(3Y) by spark plasma sintering. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 20(14-15), 2441-2445. doi:10.1016/s0955-2219(00)00152-7Borrell, A., Fernández, A., Merino, C., & Torrecillas, R. (2010). High density carbon materials obtained at relatively low temperature by spark plasma sintering of carbon nanofibers. International Journal of Materials Research, 101(1), 112-116. doi:10.3139/146.110246Dusza, J., Morgiel, J., Tatarko, P., & Puchy, V. (2009). Characterization of interfaces in ZrO2–carbon nanofiber composite. Scripta Materialia, 61(3), 253-256. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.052Lauwers, B., Kruth, J. P., Liu, W., Eeraerts, W., Schacht, B., & Bleys, P. (2004). Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 149(1-3), 347-352. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.01

    Improvement of CNFs/SiC nanocomposites properties obtained from different routes and consolidated by pulsed electric-current pressure sintering

    Full text link
    The influence of the preparation route and composition on carbon nanofibers-silicon carbide (CNFs/SiC) nanocomposites' properties was studied. Nanopowders were mixed by ultrasonic dispersion or high attrition milling and the consolidation was done by pulsed electric-current pressure sintering technique. The relative density and fracture strength of high-energy attrition milled CNFs/SiC nanocomposites gradually increased with the increase of sintering temperature, from 1400 to 1800 degrees C and holding time 1 to 30 min. A chemical surface coating of CNFs with alumina precursor is proposed as a very effective way for improving the interaction between CNFs and SiC. An increase of 54% in fracture strength was achieved on the nanocomposites when the surface coating was used. As a consequence of the stronger interaction between the components, which is achieved through the use of suitable processing route and sintering parameters, and the role of nano-alumina as sintering aid improved mechanical properties was achieved. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.This work has been carried out with the financial support of the National Plan Projects nos. MAT2006-01783 and MAT2007-30989-E and the Regional Project no. FICYT PC07-021. A. Borrell, acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for her Juan de la Cierva contract (no. JCI-2011-10498).Rocha, VG.; Borrell Tomás, MA.; Torrecillas, R.; Fernandez, A. (2012). Improvement of CNFs/SiC nanocomposites properties obtained from different routes and consolidated by pulsed electric-current pressure sintering. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 556:414-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.006S41441955

    Application of nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors and biosensors

    Get PDF
    The unique chemical and physical properties of nanoparticles make them extremely suitable for designing new and improved sensing devices, especially electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Many kinds of nanoparticles, such as metal, oxide and semiconductor nanoparticles have been used for constructing electrochemical sensors and biosensors, and these nanoparticles play different roles in different sensing systems. The important functions provided by nanoparticles include the immobilization of biomolecules, the catalysis of electrochemical reactions, the enhancement of electron transfer between electrode surfaces and proteins, labeling of biomolecules and even acting as reactant. This minireview addresses recent advances in nanoparticle-based electrochemical sensors and biosensors, and summarizes the main functions of nanoparticles in these sensor systems

    Prospects of Nanotechnology in Clinical Immunodiagnostics

    Get PDF
    Nanostructured materials are promising compounds that offer new opportunities as sensing platforms for the detection of biomolecules. Having micrometer-scale length and nanometer-scale diameters, nanomaterials can be manipulated with current nanofabrication methods, as well as self-assembly techniques, to fabricate nanoscale bio-sensing devices. Nanostructured materials possess extraordinary physical, mechanical, electrical, thermal and multifunctional properties. Such unique properties advocate their use as biomimetic membranes to immobilize and modify biomolecules on the surface of nanoparticles. Alignment, uniform dispersion, selective growth and diameter control are general parameters which play critical roles in the successful integration of nanostructures for the fabrication of bioelectronic sensing devices. In this review, we focus on different types and aspects of nanomaterials, including their synthesis, properties, conjugation with biomolecules and their application in the construction of immunosensing devices. Some key results from each cited article are summarized by relating the concept and mechanism behind each sensor, experimental conditions and the behavior of the sensor under different conditions, etc. The variety of nanomaterial-based bioelectronic devices exhibiting novel functions proves the unique properties of nanomaterials in such sensing devices, which will surely continue to expand in the future. Such nanomaterial based devices are expected to have a major impact in clinical immunodiagnostics, environmental monitoring, security surveillance and for ensuring food safety

    Networked Biomedical System for Ubiquitous Health Monitoring

    Get PDF
    We propose a distributed system that enables global and ubiquitous health monitoring of patients. The biomedical data will be collected by wearable health diagnostic devices, which will include various types of sensors and will be transmitted towards the corresponding Health Monitoring Centers. The permanent medical data of patients will be kept in the corresponding Home Data Bases, while the measured biomedical data will be sent to the Visitor Health Monitor Center and Visitor Data Base that serves the area of present location of the patient. By combining the measured biomedical data and the permanent medical data, Health Medical Centers will be able to coordinate the needed actions and help the local medical teams to make quickly the best decisions that could be crucial for the patient health, and that can reduce the cost of health service

    The usage of a bismuth film electrode as transducer in glucose biosensing

    No full text
    WOS: 000252484600029A second generation glucose biosensor was developed by using neutral red (NR) as a mediator and a bismuth film electrode (BiFE) as a transducer along with immobilized glucose oxidase. The linear range was between 0.2 and 2.5mM, and a correlation coefficient of 0.999 was obtained with this electrode. The standard deviation (at 1mM glucose for n = 4) and the coefficient of variation were calculated as +/- 8.07 mu M and 3.4%, respectively. The biosensor was used for the determination of glucose in wine samples
    corecore